Re: Make all windows moveable by default

2006-10-09 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The problem with it is full screen image viewer mode. When I go back to >> file browser and then to image viewer - I see full-screen window with >> caption that is shifted down. Before this change window's caption and >>

Re: oleaut32: Add tmarshal conformance test

2006-10-09 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:45:16PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > Dan H., could you have a quick look at Michal's patch? Well, the patch I sent in didn't crash on my machine, but crashed on Alexandre's (and maybe others' who didn't try to run it). It's pretty hard to fix something that works when you

Re: oleaut32: Add tmarshal conformance test

2006-10-09 Thread Dan Kegel
On 10/9/06, Michal Okresa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 09 October 2006 19:14, Dan Kegel wrote: ... > I think it's great you're working on this. What were the bugs? Thanks for your comments. I discovered these two problems in Rob's patch which make test crash. * Firstly function IKindaE

Re: localspl/tests: One more Test for InitializePrintMonitor

2006-10-09 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
On Do, 2006-10-05 at 00:07 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > Changelog: > - localspl/tests: One more Test for InitializePrintMonitor > Any hint for my localspl - Patches would be nice. InitializePrintMonitor: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-October/031353.html Test: http://

Re: windows web server app fails to send more than 11680 bytes !?

2006-10-09 Thread [IDC]Dragon
> to me, I wouldn't be surprised if overlapped I/O on sockets are to blame > a +ntdll trace would be helpful How do I enable that? (likely a noob question) >From your comments I take it's no setup problem on my side, could be a real >bug. Meanwhile I got some more info from the developer, rela

Re: windows web server app fails to send more than 11680 bytes !?

2006-10-09 Thread Eric Pouech
Jan Zerebecki wrote: On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:28:10PM +0200, [IDC]Dragon wrote: We see them being sent on the Ethernet and the ACK's are coming in, but after these 8 packets there should be a signal to trigger the OnSend function of the app so it can send the next part of data, but this n

Re: mscoree: Invoke installed win32 mono runtime or exec mono native for .NET executables

2006-10-09 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Monday 09 October 2006 17:50, Paul Chitescu wrote: > I changed the patch to temporarily change the current directory to Mono's > so that libraries can be loaded from there. Calling mono.exe is a bad idea > but if you want to use it you can put the unix path in registry. Why? Is calling mono.ex

Re: mscoree: Invoke installed win32 mono runtime or exec mono native for .NET executables (try 3)

2006-10-09 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Monday 09 October 2006 18:28, Paul Chitescu wrote: > This is the 3rd version of the patch which tries to load mono more robustly > and also dropped the WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN. It still fails: trace:mscoree:DllMain (0x7edf, 1, 0x1) trace:mscoree:_CorExeMain trace:mscoree:runMain Attempting to

Re: dlls/winex11.drv/opengl.c : DEADLOCK not leaving critsection

2006-10-09 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
> When wine fails initialiwing opengl, the critical sections stays blocked, > wich prevent any other graphical thread to be successfully launched > > by Nicolas Delcros, 2006/10/09 Hi, Thanks for your wine patch but there's already a similar patch in CVS/GIT. Next time make sure that you work o

Re: mscoree: Invoke installed win32 mono runtime or exec mono native for .NET executables (try 2)

2006-10-09 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Montag 09 Oktober 2006 17:52 schrieb Paul Chitescu: > alternatives can be provided in Registry, separated by commas. For > each an attempt to execute it (spawnvp with OVERLAY flag set). The > exception is the keyword MONOEMBED that Do you have any idea how we can deal with other libraries, for e

Re: mscoree: Invoke installed win32 mono runtime or exec mono nativefor .NET executables (try 2)

2006-10-09 Thread Paul Chitescu
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > [...] > WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN is used only by windows.h to omit some optional > includes. Since inclusion of windows.h is forbidden in Wine DLLs > defining WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN is not needed. Sometimes I'm a lazy copy'n'paster. Paul

Re: mscoree: Invoke installed win32 mono runtime or exec mono nativefor .NET executables (try 2)

2006-10-09 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Paul Chitescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- ./dlls/mscoree/mscoree_main.c.orig 2006-10-06 21:38:15.0 +0300 +++ ./dlls/mscoree/mscoree_main.c 2006-10-08 16:11:47.0 +0300 @@ -19,15 +19,104 @@ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA */ -#

Re: mscoree: Invoke installed win32 mono runtime or exec mono native for .NET executables

2006-10-09 Thread Paul Chitescu
Hans, Please see answers inline. On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Hans Leidekker wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > Several alternatives can be provided in Registry, separated by commas. For > > each an attempt to execute it (spawnvp with OVERLAY flag set). The > > exception is the keyword MONOEMBED that will try to lo

Re: Make all windows moveable by default

2006-10-09 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem with it is full screen image viewer mode. When I go back to file browser and then to image viewer - I see full-screen window with caption that is shifted down. Before this change window's caption and borders was not visible. I observe e

Re: [PATCH 1/5] lz32/tests: Test more last errors set by LZOpenFile[AW].

2006-10-09 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
* On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > * Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > That was the reason I kept the check in. It doesn't enforce > > unnecessary complexity in the function, so I doubt the check is wrong. > > Especially given that this fn on both platforms behave

grr. anti-unix fud in newspaper...

2006-10-09 Thread Dan Kegel
This morning in the LA Times, the business section had a big article on Airbus' woes, and blamed it on the CAD software: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-airbus9oct09,1,4119560.story?coll=la-headlines-business&ctrack=1&cset=true "In designing the plane, German engineers in Hamburg used older

Re: windows web server app fails to send more than 11680 bytes !?

2006-10-09 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:28:10PM +0200, [IDC]Dragon wrote: > We see them being sent on the Ethernet and the ACK's are coming in, but > after these 8 packets there should be a signal to trigger the OnSend > function of the app so it can send the next part of data, but this never > happens... Th

Re: [PATCH 1/5] lz32/tests: Test more last errors set by LZOpenFile[AW].

2006-10-09 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
* On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > * Saulius Krasuckas wrote: > > Unless Alexandre confirms the requirement directly. In such case I am > > going to put this stuff into our Wiki ^^ even write a patch for > > cleaning the calls myself ;) > > No wonder people can't get _any_ response

Re: dsound.dll, dlls/dsound/mixer.c -- DSOUND_MixerVol() optimization

2006-10-09 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Sonntag 08 Oktober 2006 10:47 schrieb Mirek: > What platform does not have MMX instructions and is now supported, is it > problem to detect if CPU have MMX and use it if is it possible? Because > speed improvment is always wantable. Shouldn't C code be writeable in a way that the compiler recogn

Re: mscoree: Invoke installed win32 mono runtime or exec mono native for .NET executables

2006-10-09 Thread Hans Leidekker
Hi Paul, > Several alternatives can be provided in Registry, separated by commas. For > each an attempt to execute it (spawnvp with OVERLAY flag set). The > exception is the keyword MONOEMBED that will try to locate and dynamically > load an installed Win32 mono. I tried your patch with Win32 Mon

Re: windows web server app fails to send more than 11680 bytes !?

2006-10-09 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Sonntag 08 Oktober 2006 23:28 schrieb [IDC]Dragon: > For example, the app tries to write 25017 bytes to the socket, but the > socket only allows 11680 bytes at a time, and the TCP stack fragments > this in 8 packets of 1460 bytes, presumably because it only has 8 > buffers reserved. So far so go