"Aric Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+SetRect( &rc, 0,40, 100,60);
+SetRect( &cliprc, 0,0, 100,100);
+ScrollWindowEx( hwnd1, 0, -25, &rc, &cliprc, hrgn, &rcu, SW_INVALIDATE);
+SetRectRgn( tmprgn, 0,15,98,35);
+CombineRgn( exprgn, exprgn, tmprgn, RGN_OR);
+SetRectRgn(
"Louis. Lenders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@@ -849,7 +858,17 @@ static void convert_888_to_0888_asis(int
for (x=0; x < w2; x++) {
/* Do 4 pixels at a time: 3 dwords in and 4 dwords out */
DWORD srcval1,srcval2;
-srcval1=srcpixel[0];
+/* So
On 03/03/07, Ivan Gyurdiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changelog:
> - The texldl instruction takes 3 arguments
>
Can the SW shader handlers be deleted now that the rest of the SW code
is gone.
They just get out of sync when you do things like this.
Hmm, yeah. Software shaders seem to be more
Changelog:
- The texldl instruction takes 3 arguments
Can the SW shader handlers be deleted now that the rest of the SW code
is gone.
They just get out of sync when you do things like this.
Yes, sorry about that. Here is the modified patch
-Nigel
On 3/2/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/2/07, Nigel Nia-Chiang Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch implements a dummy version of cacls.exe to fix bug 7593.
>
+#RC_SRCS = wcmdrc.rc
+#RC_BINSRC = wcmdrc.
That's not really that much of an issue as only the ML is official so
devs and such don't have to go trapsing after people, they have to come
here.
Ex.
Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 20:57 +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
>>> Luis C. Busquets Pérez wrote:
I
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 12:55 +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 20:57 +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> >> Luis C. Busquets Pérez wrote:
> >>> I understand that for some people the mailing list is a far better
> >>> thing. May be for some other, a forum is be
> If I understand it correctly, there was an idea floating
> around that Ge van Geldorp had which was to auto generate the
> needed DIB engine code for certain color depths and functions
> so you would not have to implement the whole thing at once.
> if I remember correctly he did a proof of co
On 3/2/07, Nigel Nia-Chiang Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
This patch implements a dummy version of cacls.exe to fix bug 7593.
+#RC_SRCS = wcmdrc.rc
+#RC_BINSRC = wcmdrc.rc
+#RC_BINARIES = wcmd.ico
Did you accidentally leave these in?
--
James Hawkins
Erich Hoover wrote:
I see your point. However, since the function you are implementing is in
kernel32 anyway you could abstract it away and make both functions
(CopyFile and ReplaceFile) call some internal function. That way you
would get rid of the locking completly which is argueably somewhat u
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
[...]
> But I think if you can do a fluent transition, then the huge amount of work
> will be cutable into small, doable chunks of work, and if you stop after
> doing half of the work for some reason the existing things are still of use.
It depends what
You seem to not realize that painting also happens outside of the
WM_PAINT
handler, moreover some apps do not call EndPaint in WM_PAINT, or call it
before they paint anything.
Yep effectively I realized it after sending my mail.
Anyway, Alexandre think that this project is not a good choice
"Benoit Pradelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps should we draw everything asked in memory and just send it to X
when the application calls EndPaint, this way we limit the interaction
with the X server (and locks).
You seem to not realize that painting also happens outside of the WM_PAINT
Hi,
On 3/2/07, Damjan Jovanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The other thing is that there are many aspects of GDI drawing, you
have to take into account region clipping, pens, brushes, line
thickness, line style, fill style, and other wonders, and make them
work in 1, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 32 bit colo
Peter Oberndorfer wrote:
---
Did not seem to happen in the wild,
but just make sure the test fails gracefully
if launching the child fails
Applies on top of the patch which should fix test result reporting
If it doesn't happen in the wild, then it should stay as an "ok".
--
Rob Shearman
The other thing is that there are many aspects of GDI drawing, you
have to take into account region clipping, pens, brushes, line
thickness, line style, fill style, and other wonders, and make them
work in 1, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 32 bit colour depth pixel-for-pixel exact
with the way Windows does th
On 3/1/07, Benoit Pradelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First thank you for your very complete answer,
I'm not really familiar with Wine (and the Windows API) and I don't
understand why do you think that it will be such an hard work.
Read some code in dlls/winex11.drv in the wine tree, you will
Scott Ritchie wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 20:57 +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
Luis C. Busquets Pérez wrote:
I understand that for some people the mailing list is a far better
thing. May be for some other, a forum is better.
Why not trying both systems?
This question has already been answered
> Benoit Pradelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I'm not really familiar with Wine (and the Windows API) and I don't
>
> understand
>
> >why do you think that it will be such an hard work. For me, the work will
>
> consist
>
> >in redirect the GDI calls from the X11 pseudo-driver to some new
Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> Removed todo from succeeding tests.
>>
>> Tests showed that only DACL can be set this way. Owner and group
>> are taken from the token. And we don't need SACL at this time if ever.
>> ---
>> dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 20:57 +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> Luis C. Busquets Pérez wrote:
> > I understand that for some people the mailing list is a far better
> > thing. May be for some other, a forum is better.
> >
> > Why not trying both systems?
> >
>
> This question has already been answer
Hi,
This patch add the skip information to test.winehq.org. I'm not a 100% sure what
will happen to the already existing reports when summary.js is patched. This
however is only relevant for someone opening the popup window for old reports.
There could be an issue when somebody is running an old
22 matches
Mail list logo
