On 4/2/07, Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Sunday 01 April 2007 20:19 schrieb Paul Vriens:
> Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > ChangeLog
> > --
> > add some tests for RegDeleteTreeA
>
> Hi Stefan
>
> good to see someone picked up this thing. I ran your new tests on Vista
>
Chris Robinson wrote:
On Saturday 31 March 2007 02:25:52 am you wrote:
You can change WineD3D to allow WINED3DFMT_P8, but you have to modify d3d8
and d3d9 to filter it out. This is the correct approach then. Injecting P8
in ddraw will work too, but it is not correct from the design point of
v
On Saturday 31 March 2007 02:25:52 am you wrote:
> You can change WineD3D to allow WINED3DFMT_P8, but you have to modify d3d8
> and d3d9 to filter it out. This is the correct approach then. Injecting P8
> in ddraw will work too, but it is not correct from the design point of
> view(since then wined
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:59 +1000,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Sasan
>
> > ...but I think having the top most used windows
> > software working on Wine out of the box will do wonders for its
> > popularity
>
> Is popularity a desirable goal?
>
> Will increasing the number of users result in
John Smith wrote:
April fools?
With utter certainty.
For those who don't know Dan personally, it might not be completely
obvious that the job description he gives (team lead of 50 guys doing
C#/VBScript @ Micro$loth) is precisely his idea of working hell. In
contrast, his current gig with
In all likelihood; personally I find just the results to be amusing
where wine developers discover just how daft the windows api really
is. that in it's self has entertainment value to push ever onwards.
so no C programmers need apply.
I'm a VB programmer of 5 years, I wouldn't take a job doin
I thought you were involved in the TiSP project?
http://www.google.com/tisp/
From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
Subject: So long, and thanks for all the Wine!
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:20:56 -0700
Wine was a fine dream, but come on, there's
no way a bunch of vol
April fools?
On 4/1/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wine was a fine dream, but come on, there's
no way a bunch of volunteers could put together
an emulator for a real operating system like Windows.
Heck, after 14 years, Wine can't even run the
average Visual Basic program!
So I'm bowin
Wine was a fine dream, but come on, there's
no way a bunch of volunteers could put together
an emulator for a real operating system like Windows.
Heck, after 14 years, Wine can't even run the
average Visual Basic program!
So I'm bowing to the inevitable, and
have accepted a job with a popular oper
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main question is this - is anyone today already working on this?
I do it for three years with almost zero responce from Wine team. See, e.g., my
post to wine-devel, Mon, 13 Nov 2006.
If You care, I can upgrade my patch against current Wine releas
A user asked in
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.emulators.ms-windows.wine/msg/06fbfdfb53a28cbd
whether Wine could communicate with remote
machines via named pipes yet (he needs it to
talk with an SQLServer box).
I know Alexandre's been poking around in that area, but
I think he's working on l
> Sasan
> ...but I think having the top most used windows
> software working on Wine out of the box will do wonders for its
> popularity
Is popularity a desirable goal?
Will increasing the number of users result in a
benefit for the Wine project?
nick
***
Am Sunday 01 April 2007 20:19 schrieb Paul Vriens:
> Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > ChangeLog
> > --
> > add some tests for RegDeleteTreeA
>
> Hi Stefan
>
> good to see someone picked up this thing. I ran your new tests on Vista
> Ultimate and comments are below. (I ran the tests while
Stefan Leichter wrote:
ChangeLog
--
add some tests for RegDeleteTreeA
Hi Stefan
good to see someone picked up this thing. I ran your new tests on Vista Ultimate
and comments are below. (I ran the tests while bypassing UAC, as administrator).
On 4/1/07, Louis. Lenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, this test shows similar problem as in bug 7380. On windows SetDIBits
returns 0, when a bogus pointer is passed in by the application. Wine
crashes on this test. I'll send in anoter try to fix this bug hereafter.
You can't send in a test
On 4/1/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
>Subject: Re: winecfg and cdrom drives
>Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 11:14:55 -0600
>
>EA Durbin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Aren't we doing this already?
From: Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: Re: winecfg and cdrom drives
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 11:14:55 -0600
EA Durbin wrote:
>
>
>> Aren't we doing this already?
>>
>>
>> Alexander N. Sørnes
>>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >cd rom d
EA Durbin wrote:
>
>
>> Aren't we doing this already?
>>
>>
>> Alexander N. Sørnes
>>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >cd rom drives should be detected without user intervention, imho
>> > >> >
>> > >> >users shouldn't have to run a special gui config tool to get their
>> > >> >drives recognized
>> > >> >
>>
Aren't we doing this already?
Alexander N. Sørnes
> >> >
> >> >cd rom drives should be detected without user intervention, imho
> >> >
> >> >users shouldn't have to run a special gui config tool to get their
> >> >drives recognized
> >> >
> >> >so if it needs fixing, let's fix it in e.g. wi
Søndag 01 april 2007 18:11, skrev EA Durbin:
> Does anyone who is Mac saavy have ideas on the best way to accomplish cdrom
> detection in wineprefixcreate across Mac OSX and *nix platforms?
>
> >From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: winecfg and
Does anyone who is Mac saavy have ideas on the best way to accomplish cdrom
detection in wineprefixcreate across Mac OSX and *nix platforms?
From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: winecfg and cdrom drives
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 08:33:37 -0700
I h
21 matches
Mail list logo
