Re: [winealsa] add support for mixer devices

2007-04-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Dmitry Timoshkov schreef: > "Maarten Lankhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +/** >> >> + *mxdMessage (WINEALSA.3) >> + */ >> +DWORD WINAPI ALSA_mxdMessage(UINT wDevID, UINT wMsg, DWORD dwUser, >> +

Re: [winealsa] add support for mixer devices

2007-04-11 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Maarten Lankhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +/** + *mxdMessage (WINEALSA.3) + */ +DWORD WINAPI ALSA_mxdMessage(UINT wDevID, UINT wMsg, DWORD dwUser, + DWORD dwParam1, DW

Re: locales, unicode and ansi with msvcrt (bug 8022)

2007-04-11 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Ann & Jason Edmeades" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bug 8022 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8022) has highlighted something interesting which has me puzzled... Basically lets take xcopy as an example command line application. It issues messages to the screen using MSVCRT's wprintf(L"Unic

Re: Patches / a proposal for the mystic DIB engine

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Wickline
On 4/11/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That'd be me apparently. http://code.google.com/soc/wine/about.html Jesse -- Tom Wickline Respectable computing - Linux/FOSS

Re: Patches / a proposal for the mystic DIB engine

2007-04-11 Thread Jesse Allen
On 4/11/07, Matt Finnicum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a returning GSoC student, I had asked about this last year: It's primarily the student's responsibility to work out the conflicts, but it'd be best for you two to talk to one another. The student's obligation is do do what they said they wo

Re: Patches / a proposal for the mystic DIB engine

2007-04-11 Thread Matt Finnicum
As a returning GSoC student, I had asked about this last year: It's primarily the student's responsibility to work out the conflicts, but it'd be best for you two to talk to one another. The student's obligation is do do what they said they would, so if you complete their proposal for them it doe

Re: Patches / a proposal for the mystic DIB engine

2007-04-11 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Oops. Forgot the patches. Here they are. And the very second I sent the last E-Mail the DIB engine work got accepted as a SoC project (by someone else)... I've no idea what this means to me. Someone clarify please. :) diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/bitblt.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/bitblt.c index 00bf

Patches / a proposal for the mystic DIB engine

2007-04-11 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Okay, I've spent the last days looking into this matter and I'd like to suggest a way to get it started. So. This is the plan: 1. In winex11.drv: -INT X11DRV_LockDIBSection(X11DRV_PDEVICE *physDev, INT req, BOOL lossy) +HBITMAP X11DRV_LockDIBSection(X11DRV_PDEVICE *physDev, INT req, BOOL force)

Wine vs. Cedega in Benchmarks

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Wickline
Hello All, I have been pondering the thoughts of running every benchmark that I have on Wine, Cedega, XP, and CX to see where we stack up in the performance game. And while doing my daily reading of news sites I came across this posted on /. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=68

Re: How come individual applications can't be put on a virtual desktop in winecfg?

2007-04-11 Thread Scott Ritchie
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 22:35 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:14 +, L. Rahyen wrote: > >>Very simple. Run your application like this: > >> > >> wine explorer /desktop=MyDesktopName,640x480 myprogram.exe > >> > > >

Re: Windows dll as Linux Shared Object

2007-04-11 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Donnerstag 12 April 2007 00:28 schrieb Phil Lodwick: > > or to write some proxy winelib app and > > talk to the DLL using ipc like sockets, > > pipes, shared memory, etc. > > Thanks Stefan. I thought I was missing something. > > This was the approach that I was planning on as a backup. Looks l

RE: Windows dll as Linux Shared Object

2007-04-11 Thread Phil Lodwick
> or to write some proxy winelib app and > talk to the DLL using ipc like sockets, > pipes, shared memory, etc. Thanks Stefan. I thought I was missing something. This was the approach that I was planning on as a backup. Looks like I bring the backup plan to the front burner. Basically Linux

Re: Windows dll as Linux Shared Object

2007-04-11 Thread Stefan Dösinger
I'm not the DLL expert, but I think you're missing something here. The problem is that your windows dll will most likely use the windows api(otherwise, don't use wine at all). The windows API depends on some other things, like a few memory management constraints, the windows registry, and most

locales, unicode and ansi with msvcrt (bug 8022)

2007-04-11 Thread Ann & Jason Edmeades
Hello, Bug 8022 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8022) has highlighted something interesting which has me puzzled... Basically lets take xcopy as an example command line application. It issues messages to the screen using MSVCRT's wprintf(L"Unicode string") type function Wprintf -> vsnwpr

Windows dll as Linux Shared Object

2007-04-11 Thread Phil Lodwick
Greetings, My googling skills are letting me down today. I believe I have seen several people requesting to do the same and answers indicating it is possible. However, after several hours of reading email archives from 2000-2007 are am officially confused :-( I have successfully ported an appli

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Spear
I just tried the patch is it fails, but I copied and pasted the code into the correct files and am recompiling wine now. We will see just how far we can get with the stubs.. Tom P.S. did this get submitted to wine-patches today as well? On 4/11/07, Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tom S

Re: How come individual applications can't be put on a virtual desktop in winecfg?

2007-04-11 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:14 +, L. Rahyen wrote: >> Very simple. Run your application like this: >> >> wine explorer /desktop=MyDesktopName,640x480 myprogram.exe >> > > So why doesn't winecfg let me do this? ;) Because it wouldn't do what you

re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Dan Kegel
Alexander Sørnes wrote: > No, if native dlls are required then it's very helpful for users to know > which ones, and it's even better if you provide download links to these > dlls, by using sites such as www.dll-files.com or www.dll-downloads.com, > or uploading your own somewhere. Helpful and b

Re: How come individual applications can't be put on a virtual desktop in winecfg?

2007-04-11 Thread Scott Ritchie
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:14 +, L. Rahyen wrote: > Wednesday April 11 2007 09:56、Scott Ritchie さんは書きました: > > I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98 > > mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop. > > > > But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
On Mi, 2007-04-11 at 10:18 -0500, Tom Spear wrote: > Is there a fully stubbed dll in the current tree that I could use as a > reference to start a stub for acledit? I'd like to at least see how > far I can get with a stubbed dll, Eric send already a sub, but ... Is something missing here? http

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Mittwoch 11 April 2007 20:26 schrieb Tom Spear: > Legal? From Microsoft's standpoint, no, but as long as you have a > valid windows license, then I dont see why there should be any > problem. Thus the reason I didn't actually provide any links. > Besides, a quick google search for the dll brin

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
Onsdag 11 april 2007 20:09, skrev du : > > No, if native dlls are required then it's very helpful for users to know > > which ones, and it's even better if you provide download links to these > > dlls, by using sites such as www.dll-files.com or www.dll-downloads.com, > > or uploading your own some

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Spear
Legal? From Microsoft's standpoint, no, but as long as you have a valid windows license, then I dont see why there should be any problem. Thus the reason I didn't actually provide any links. Besides, a quick google search for the dll brings up the dll-files site for the dll.. Tom On 4/11/07, S

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Stefan Dösinger
> No, if native dlls are required then it's very helpful for users to know > which ones, and it's even better if you provide download links to these > dlls, by using sites such as www.dll-files.com or www.dll-downloads.com, or > uploading your own somewhere. Helpful and better yes, but legal? pgp

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Eric Pouech
Tom Spear a écrit : Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I would ask for opinions. I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked back thru the traces and it was because we were m

Re: www.winehq.org resolves to smth strange.

2007-04-11 Thread Emmanuel Maillard
Hi, I have almost the same problem, I cannot perfom 'git fetch' for 2/3 weeks now, failed with timeout error. (git-clone too) Any tricks ? Thanks Emmanuel Le 10 avr. 07 à 21:17, Kirill K. Smirnov a écrit : Hi, I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to http://se

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Paul Vriens
Tom Spear wrote: GAR! I just checked Paul's site after sending the last email. He already has a stubbed version of acledit. Paul, do you mind sending me what you have? I'd like to take a look, but cant guarantee I can get anything done, but still, I'd at least like to try. Tom Hi Tom, I d

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
Onsdag 11 april 2007 16:48, skrev Tom Spear: > Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I > would ask for opinions. > > I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I > first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked > back thru the t

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Spear
GAR! I just checked Paul's site after sending the last email. He already has a stubbed version of acledit. Paul, do you mind sending me what you have? I'd like to take a look, but cant guarantee I can get anything done, but still, I'd at least like to try. Tom On 4/11/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL P

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Spear
On 4/11/07, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: They are only required because they are imported by acledit.dll, as is also samlib.dll. You might want to do a little debugging next time to see what modules are importing the DLLs. The only DLL that is required directly and that needs to be

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Robert Shearman
Tom Spear wrote: I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked back thru the traces and it was because we were missing acledit.dll.. So I imported that from my windows xp install, and got the dialog again. Tu

Re: Old trial versions of Photoshop?

2007-04-11 Thread Dan Kegel
On 4/11/07, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for all the info. I've collected it at > http://wiki.winehq.org/AdobePhotoshop > which is my "let's get Photoshop working well" page. Hmmm... PS 5.5 : http://frankscorner.org/index.php?p=ps55 PS 6.0 : http://frankscorner.org/index.ph

Re: Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Paul Vriens
Tom Spear wrote: Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I would ask for opinions. I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked back thru the traces and it was because we were miss

Questions about using native vs implementing our own

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Spear
Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I would ask for opinions. I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked back thru the traces and it was because we were missing acledit.dll..

Re: How come individual applications can't be put on a virtual desktop in winecfg?

2007-04-11 Thread L. Rahyen
Wednesday April 11 2007 09:56、Scott Ritchie さんは書きました: > I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98 > mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop. > > But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come I > can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this

Re: How come individual applications can't be put on a virtual desktop in winecfg?

2007-04-11 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:56:33AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote: > How come I > can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this application, Did you try with explorer as described at http://wiki.winehq.org/DesktopWindow ? Jan

Re: How come individual applications can't be put on a virtual desktop in winecfg?

2007-04-11 Thread Robert Shearman
Scott Ritchie wrote: I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98 mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop. But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come I can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this application, and handle everything else

Re: Contributing money to WINE?

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Wickline
On 4/10/07, Frank Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I find myself in a similar dilemma... What if a few of us banded together and put a bounty on a feature / app, or contracted codeweavers to implement it? I think that would be great. Assuming we can agree on something we'd like to fund, it wo

Re: Old trial versions of Photoshop?

2007-04-11 Thread Tom Wickline
On 4/10/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/10/07, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How about Photoshop 5? We still have one bug open against it: > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7909 > > Version 5.5 is here: > ftp://ftp1.adobe.com/pub/adobe/magic/photoshop/win/5.x

How come individual applications can't be put on a virtual desktop in winecfg?

2007-04-11 Thread Scott Ritchie
I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98 mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop. But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come I can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this application, and handle everything else in the window manager?

Re: wine latest packages for feisty

2007-04-11 Thread Scott Ritchie
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 11:38 -0600, Philip A. Marshall wrote: > For what it's worth, I added the Edgy wine repository and used the Edgy > packages for wine 0.9.34 under Feisty. It seems to work, so I'll > probably use the Edgy repository until the Feisty repository starts up. > > Expect it to be

Re: www.winehq.org resolves to smth strange.

2007-04-11 Thread Kirill K. Smirnov
Thanks all, culript is found! My /etc/hosts, /etc/resolv.conf are OK. At last I changed nameserver to the public one (195.242.2.126) and everything began to work! I think someone hijacked DNS in the LAN. What is strange, all other sites except winehq.org I tried worked OK. So I put the issue

Re: wine latest packages for feisty

2007-04-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Philip A. Marshall schreef: > For what it's worth, I added the Edgy wine repository and used the Edgy > packages for wine 0.9.34 under Feisty. It seems to work, so I'll > probably use the Edgy repository until the Feisty repository starts up. > I did the same, it doesn't seem to mind, only diff