Re: Adding header files for the implementation of Winscard dll (Smart Cards support)

2007-05-02 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Mounir IDRASSI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: diff --git a/include/scarderr.h b/include/scarderr.h new file mode 100755 index 000..c07833e --- /dev/null +++ b/include/scarderr.h ... diff --git a/include/winscard.h b/include/winscard.h new file mode 100755 index 000..f302a9f --- /dev/null

Re: Adding header files for the implementation of Winscard dll (Smart Cards support)

2007-05-02 Thread Mounir IDRASSI
Sorry, my mistake... I'll definitely be more careful next time. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: This is a notice more for Alexandre this time, but next time please make sure to send the files with exec bits turned off (755

Re: Any way to get the current code besides git?

2007-05-02 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Tom Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Haven't killed it yet and been waiting for 2 hours.. I'm on a T-3 afaik. Last line that prints before it just sits is: walk 4eea356e2d39f1a958afb4d8f5b54381e8972ecf This turns out to be a bug in libcurl. It's fixed in libcurl = 7.16. -- Alexandre

Re: Any way to get the current code besides git?

2007-05-02 Thread Tom Spear
On 5/2/07, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Haven't killed it yet and been waiting for 2 hours.. I'm on a T-3 afaik. Last line that prints before it just sits is: walk 4eea356e2d39f1a958afb4d8f5b54381e8972ecf This turns out to be a bug in

Patch question

2007-05-02 Thread Tom Spear
Just curious if there was something wrong with the regedit patch I sent on Friday, or if maybe there is a particular reason that the /C was left out of the code in the first place, that I am missing, and would help me to understand.

Re: Any way to get the current code besides git?

2007-05-02 Thread Tom Spear
On 5/2/07, Tom Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/2/07, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Haven't killed it yet and been waiting for 2 hours.. I'm on a T-3 afaik. Last line that prints before it just sits is: walk

Re: Bug in Advapi32: CryptEnumProviderTypesA and CryptEnumProvidersA

2007-05-02 Thread Eric Pouech
Mounir IDRASSI a écrit : Should we fill a bugzilla report before submitting the patch? Thanks. no need for opening the bugzilla entry, just send the patch to wine-patches A+ -- Eric Pouech The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a

Re: dbghelp performance

2007-05-02 Thread Eric Pouech
Markus Amsler a écrit : I've played around with dbghelp performance. My test case was breaking at an unknown symbol (break gaga) while WoW was loaded in the debugger (wine winedbg WoW.exe). The time was hand stopped, memory usage measured with ps -AF and looked at the RSS column. Test

Re: [5/5] WineD3D: Software vertex blending

2007-05-02 Thread H. Verbeet
+for(i = 0; i 16 /* Max vertex attribs */; i++) { I think you should be using MAX_ATTRIBS there. Changing the strided data like that in drawPrimitive looks rather hacky to me.

OLE2A

2007-05-02 Thread Bill Medland
Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine? Presumably OLE2A returning null means that the thread ran out of stack space? Bill Medland

Re: dbghelp performance

2007-05-02 Thread Markus Amsler
Eric Pouech wrote: Markus Amsler a écrit : I've played around with dbghelp performance. My test case was breaking at an unknown symbol (break gaga) while WoW was loaded in the debugger (wine winedbg WoW.exe). The time was hand stopped, memory usage measured with ps -AF and looked at the RSS

Re: [5/5] WineD3D: Software vertex blending

2007-05-02 Thread Ivan Gyurdiev
H. Verbeet wrote: +for(i = 0; i 16 /* Max vertex attribs */; i++) { I think you should be using MAX_ATTRIBS there. Changing the strided data like that in drawPrimitive looks rather hacky to me. You cannot access the strided data by both named approach (u.s.something) and

Re: What's the long term plan for 64 bit support?

2007-05-02 Thread Steven Edwards
On 5/2/07, Scott Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the (distant) future, will we support building Wine with both 64 bit and 32 bit libraries, and then the same Wine installation will run both 64 bit and 32 bit apps? As I understand it, this is the way Windows does in its 64 bit versions. I

Re: What's the long term plan for 64 bit support?

2007-05-02 Thread Scott Ritchie
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:54 -0400, Steven Edwards wrote: On 5/2/07, Scott Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the (distant) future, will we support building Wine with both 64 bit and 32 bit libraries, and then the same Wine installation will run both 64 bit and 32 bit apps? As I understand

Re: OLE2A

2007-05-02 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Bill Medland wrote: Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine? Presumably OLE2A returning null means that the thread ran out of stack space? What is OLE2A? I do not see it mentioned anyewhere in the Wine source. Any more debugging