Hi,
I was trying to read a '+all,+relay,-syslevel,-gdi,-font' trace but several
lines show something like:
000d:Cget_window_property000d:Call0x000d:, atom=000d:Call
usePropertySheetInfo000d00d:Call user32.CharNextA(0 {000d:Call
user32.CharNextA(0040a04d les\\Nmap) ret=0040551c
The
The Wine package in Ubuntu Gutsy is currently failing to build on the
AMD 64 arch, and I'm not sure why. I don't have a gutsy 64 system to
play around with at the moment, but you can see the package error log
here:
Scott Ritchie schreef:
The Wine package in Ubuntu Gutsy is currently failing to build on the
AMD 64 arch, and I'm not sure why. I don't have a gutsy 64 system to
play around with at the moment, but you can see the package error log
here:
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 12:31 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Scott Ritchie schreef:
The Wine package in Ubuntu Gutsy is currently failing to build on the
AMD 64 arch, and I'm not sure why. I don't have a gutsy 64 system to
play around with at the moment, but you can see the package error
Artur Szymiec wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vitaliy Margolen napisał(a):
Artur Szymiec wrote:
Here is attached patch
for joystick_linuxinput.c where bug in dead zone
calculation make joystick unusable. After correction
tested in two games and works properly.
Best
Artur Szymiec wrote:
Here is attached patch
for joystick_linuxinput.c where bug in dead zone
calculation make joystick unusable. After correction
tested in two games and works properly.
Thanks for spotting the problem. Unfortunately your patch has few
problems too. I'll sending a
Hi Mikolaj,
nice work!
I saw that you successfully ran cxtest.sh script on your machine and
submitted results. Currently, we are in process of setuping cxtest.sh
(tests Wine make test, Picasa, WinZip, WordViewer, ExcelViewer, PptViewer)
and 3dMark2000 tests nightly on our testing machines. Once
Hi,
Currently we import ws2_32 for our wininet tests.
ws2_32 is however not available on win95 and thus presents users of winetest
with a pop-up. A crash of the tests I could live with but a pop-up gets in the
way of automatic testing (if ever implemented again).
I could do
Some of the function prototypes in wintrust.h have the wrong calling
convention. The trouble is, PSDK gets them wrong too. So calling the
functions, as declared in the PSDK header, results in a crash in
Windows. Casting them to function pointers with the correct calling
convention succeeds.
There seems to be a bug for this now:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vitaliy Margolen napisał(a):
Artur Szymiec wrote:
Here is attached patch
for joystick_linuxinput.c where bug in dead zone
calculation make joystick unusable. After correction
tested in two games and works properly.
Best Regards
Artur Szymiec
Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since there wasn't a clear consensus about how to get CA certificates
into the registry, I decided to do what Mono does: punt. So I've
written a tool that can load certificates from a file or from a URL
and stick them in the registry.
Do we really need
Do we really need them in the registry at all? It would seem a lot
safer to load them directly from some system dir.
The trouble is not knowing which is the correct system dir / file. It
changes from distro to distro, from version to version. Guessing
seems less safe (to me) than getting
Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we really need them in the registry at all? It would seem a lot
safer to load them directly from some system dir.
The trouble is not knowing which is the correct system dir / file. It
changes from distro to distro, from version to version. Guessing
As long as you don't try paths under /home, even a moderate amount of
guessing seems safer than storing them in a user-writable file.
I'm not sure I agree. If the threat model is a user doing dumb
things, there's no protection against that. If the threat model is a
rogue Windows program
On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do we really need them in the registry at all? It would seem a lot
safer to load them directly from some system dir.
The trouble is not knowing which is the correct system dir / file. It
changes
On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Kuba Ober wrote:
You calculating center wrong:
+ ret = (props-lMax-props-lMin)/2;
This won't work for min=1000 max=2000.
But it does. Maybe you meant if min/max were switched? In such case
ret = (props-lMax-props-lMin)/2;
if
Kuba Ober wrote:
You calculating center wrong:
+ ret = (props-lMax-props-lMin)/2;
This won't work for min=1000 max=2000.
But it does. Maybe you meant if min/max were switched? In such case
ret = (props-lMax-props-lMin)/2;
if (props-lMax props-lMin) ret = -ret;
Cheers, Kuba
If
Do we really need them in the registry at all? It would seem a lot
safer to load them directly from some system dir.
I really should think longer before arguing with your feedback ;)
Maybe the Root store should be a read-only one that reads from some
system path set in the registry, and
Hi Paul, I appreciate the feedback.
Ta. I've had a quick look. A couple of minor comments:
You might want to include BEGIN TRUSTED CERTIFICATE as an option when
parsing PEM-format files. All the root CAs I've seen don't use this, but
apparently its a possibility.
Okay, I'll keep it in
Currently I'm trying to learn how cxtest works. But it looks like a
good idea to find sources of such regressions. I could help to write
such a script. I will check how my script fits into it.
Mikolaj Zalewski
Hi Juan,
Sorry I was going to reply earlier but was distracted...
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 00:08:23 Juan Lang wrote:
Since there wasn't a clear consensus about how to get CA certificates
into the registry, I decided to do what Mono does: punt. So I've
written a tool that can load
Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
E.g., I'm running Goobuntu, and I have them installed in
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt.
Thanks,
--Juan
Juan Lang escribió:
Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
E.g., I'm running Goobuntu, and I have them installed in
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt.
Thanks,
--Juan
My certificates are at
Am Donnerstag, 16. August 2007 01:01 schrieb Juan Lang:
Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
E.g., I'm running Goobuntu, and I have them installed in
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt.
Gentoo
Juan Lang schreef:
Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
E.g., I'm running Goobuntu, and I have them installed in
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt.
Thanks,
--Juan
Seems same for
Juan Lang escreveu:
Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
E.g., I'm running Goobuntu, and I have them installed in
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt.
Thanks,
--Juan
Fedora 4
On Wednesday August 15 2007 23:01, Juan Lang wrote:
Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
E.g., I'm running Goobuntu, and I have them installed in
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt.
Thanks,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:02:17PM -0700, Juan Lang wrote:
What do you think of my most recent suggestion, that the Root store
should not read from the registry, but should read from certs
installed locally, where the path to them is set in the registry?
I guess that is a good and felxible
I'd say leave them wrong in our headers,
but report the problem to Microsoft,
and fix our headers when they fix theirs...
- Dan
30 matches
Mail list logo
