On Sunday October 7 2007 01:10, Tsukasa wrote:
Vitamin banned me today - you can see the full log here. Also I was about
to say at the end there, if redhat automounts usb sticks.
http://pastebin.com/mb489dc
I'm sorry but I agree with Vitaliy decision. I don't know you so I'm
judging
Louis wrote:
Ok, here one on my wish-list:
All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality.
Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Winecomponent=wine-shdocvw
briefly, and marked a few of them that looked important as 1.0. See
Dan Kegel dank at kegel.com writes:
Louis wrote:
Ok, here one on my wish-list:
All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality.
Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Winecomponent=wine-shdocvw
briefly, and marked a few
Marcus Meissner wrote:
This handles failures on wine testplatform
with Gecko not installed.
The testplatform checks might be more generic.
Ciao, Marcus
This patch should fix it:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/044833.html
Thanks,
Jacek
For reference, the projects from this past year are listed at
http://code.google.com/soc/2007/wine/about.html
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
Hi Ben,
Ben Taylor wrote:
haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10:
actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag
gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls/ntdll'
gmake[1]: *** [ntdll] Error 2
I filed a bug for this,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/149260
and Bryce sent me a beta package which works. Solved, I think!
Hi,
I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
(direct link:
http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=wineconf-2007-julliard.pdf
)
Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to
me and I will ;)
-- Original message --
From: Jacek Caban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ben,
Ben Taylor wrote:
haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10:
actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag
gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1
gmake[2]:
Can everyone else who gave a presentation put them up on the wiki?
Stefan, Detlev, Kai, Martin
On 10/7/07, Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
(direct link:
I would like consideration given to
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362
I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe might be quite common among home users
(who may get a copy with their digital camera, and not fork out for full
Photoshop).
The other bug
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:41:10PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
(direct link:
+http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=wineconf-20
+07-julliard.pdf
)
Feel free to upload
Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 16:44:27 schrieb Joerg Mayer:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:41:10PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
(direct link:
There has been 1 1/2 month since Lei sent this patch for Greek resource file
for common control and I don't see it in cvs. Why is that???
2007/8/23, Lei Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Apostolos Alexiadis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent several copies of this
patch, but none of them were in the right
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:02:18AM -0500, Clarence Risher wrote:
PS: I too have been the victim of heavy handed channel administration
in #winehq.
If anyone is interested in making #winehq a place that is more
pleasant, I would urge them to try to accomplish what I suggest
in the last paragraph
I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb and I did
some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to activate
my copy of microsoft office 2003, and both means of activating the application
are broken in wine due to bugs 9943 and 9944. Then I tried
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a
sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which
PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be much
better.
What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the
website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing
interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must have
happened since then...
On Sunday 07 October 2007 22:15:48 King InuYasha wrote:
What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the
website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing
interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must have
happened since then...
King InuYasha schrieb:
What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the
website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing
interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must
have happened since then...
On 10/7/07, EA Durbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb
I see you attached the patch to bug 9023, thanks.
and I
did some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to
activate my copy of microsoft office 2003, and
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a
sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which
PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be
much
better.
Audio in wine is still a problematic area. The situation is
Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little?
I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally.
Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from
bugzilla because it doesn't do this.
- Dan
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
Hello!
King InuYasha wrote:
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think
would be much better.
There are already a couple too
I would like to propose this one:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5351
2007/10/7, Karl Relton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like consideration given to
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362
I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe might be
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little?
I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally.
Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from
bugzilla because it doesn't do this.
Afaik this is not
Hello
Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app works
on Wine?
Regards
Roland
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: EA Durbin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Wine Developers List wine-devel@winehq.org
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 7. Oktober 2007,
On 10/8/07, Roland Kaeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app
works on Wine?
There will never be a point where all Windows apps work in Wine. As
it stands, we have a bigger compatibility goal than current versions
of
28 matches
Mail list logo
