Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I briefly looked over the diff and found some duplicates, perhaps
there are more of them:
Guy Albertelli
+Guy L. Albertelli
This one is probably a duplicate.
+Turchanov Sergei
And this one already exists as 'Sergey Turchanov'.
+NF Stevens
Norman
Luke Bratch wrote:
Hi all
As you probably know, text input in iexplore isn't
working at the moment, and hasn't worked since this
commmit:
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=92b3cab7916445d79d2559e4b580f99e3b0de479
(Found by Simon in this bug:
Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 14:43:59 Jeff Latimer wrote:
to test with and hence the delay. The current patch I submitted was
cleaning up the Null reference issue before moving on to sorting out the
I don't see any crash on Wine or XP when running the test.
Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This gets rid of one more place I have to do 'wineserver -k' to
make tests complete.
I don't think it really hangs, it just takes a long time to complete.
It would be better to embed a little ftp server into the test,
and connect to that instead of a
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 12:37:46 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
This gets rid of one more place I have to do 'wineserver -k' to
make tests complete.
I don't think it really hangs, it just takes a long time to complete.
It may have really hung before for some people. I remember leaving the
Am Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2007 11:53:52 schrieb Markus Gömmel:
Ups, I checked it here again and I can see an attachment which looks ok...
It's not so easy to use Windows tools on a Linux newsgroup :-/
It is a mailing list actually, not a newsgroup. There are some mailing
list-newsgroup bridges
Can you see if my 3rd try is valid now? Should be come through in the next
minutes...
Thanks for all your help
Markus
I usually use the archives for viewing patches, sometimes the patches
are archived separately to the email.
Markus' patch is here:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/045288.html
I usually use the archives for viewing patches, sometimes the patches
are archived separately to the email.
Markus' patch is here:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/045288.html
Right, that one had formatting characters in it due to the encoding.
Patches need to be
Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
AUTHORS | 138 ++-
1 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I've found more duplicates, sorry for the trouble.
+Veksler Michael
This is a duplicate due to the reversed
+Tom Spear
Not sure if have him already under an old name (can't remember which one).
Dustin Navea, I think. But it might be polite to retain both names in
this case.
--Juan
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
AUTHORS | 138
++-
1 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I've found more duplicates, sorry for the trouble.
+Veksler Michael
This is a
Am Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2007 15:07:16 schrieb Markus Gömmel:
Can you see if my 3rd try is valid now? Should be come through in the next
minutes...
Thanks for all your help
Looks good from the sending side. I can't comment on the printing stuff though
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Alexander Dorofeyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3rd try. In this version I don't create a temp buffer, instead pass the
original
string to subroutines; in BidiLines an additional parameter had to be added,
to
indicate that the original string has been passed and in-place modifications
it
James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fixes bug 10107. http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10107
Changelog:
* Propogate errors from events all the way up to the parent dialog.
This one fails for me:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M msi.dll -T ../../.. -p msi_test.exe.so
package.c
On 10/23/07, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it really hangs, it just takes a long time to complete.
That could be. Waiting for it to finish is like waiting for paint to dry,
though. It took six minutes just now, and I'm on a fast connection.
If we're going to keep
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
-fprintf(file, varname);
+fprintf(file, %s, varname);
fputs() would be a faster alternative to that. Though i doubt that
matters in this case.
FWIW gcc tends to convert fprintf(file, %s, arg) into
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:12:10AM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually it's not a cast. It's a heuristic that the compiler has to make
to detect a NULL pointer. The best heuristic for this is (char *) 0.
(char *)0 is bad, 0 is ok, as is
Hello,
Attached is a corrected version of this patch. I thank Mikolaj who
brought to my attention the fact that rpcproxy.h is the incorrect
location to include the files I added in the earlier patch.
This revised patch adds the includes directly to rpc.h. The Windows
version of rpc.h accesses
Anatoly Lyutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static void output(const char *message)
{
- DWORD count;
- WriteFile(GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE), message, strlen(message),
count, NULL);
+ DWORD count = 0;
+ WCHAR *mesW = NULL;
+ char *mes = NULL;
+ int wlen = 0;
+ int len = 0;
There
Hi,
I was not lucky enough to have my digital camara with me during
Wineconf, so if you've got photos uploaded somewhere please post urls
or better yet add them to the Wiki.
Thanks
--
Steven Edwards
There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has
21 matches
Mail list logo
