It appears that the links for the Windows and Solaris versions on the
winehq downloads page are very, very old. Since they're no longer
maintained, we should just remove them, yes?
Thanks,
Scott Ritchie
They should get updated. In case of Solaris there are some bugs which prevent
it
Hi,
Roderick Colenbrander schreef:
They should get updated. In case of Solaris there are some bugs which prevent
it from running I think. In case of Windows someone needs to update the
package. It is very useful to use some of the wine dlls (wined3d for
instance) or tests on Windows.
Hello,
Did anyone change #winehackers to require an invite? What was the reason for
this?
Thanks,
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 16/11/2007, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ChangeLog
--
Add tests for RSA_AES provider in rsaenh
Note:
---
Some tests might fail as there is no RSA_AES provider in wine.
These will be fixed once the implementation is in place, which will be
sent next.
The
Am Samstag, 17. November 2007 13:58:31 schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
Hello,
Did anyone change #winehackers to require an invite? What was the reason
for this?
It's sorted out already
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:58:31PM +0100, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Hello,
Did anyone change #winehackers to require an invite? What was the reason for
this?
Sorry, we had a kiddie problem.
It is back to normal now.
Ciao, Marcus
Hi,
I've opened a bug (which if fixed now btw) and the regression testing page at
http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting said Also be sure to add the author
of
the patch to the CC.
So this is what I did.
Should that line be removed from the wiki or do we generally want the author to
be
Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've opened a bug (which if fixed now btw) and the regression testing page at
http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting said Also be sure to add the author
of
the patch to the CC.
So this is what I did.
Should that line be removed from the wiki or
On Nov 17, 2007 3:44 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've opened a bug (which if fixed now btw) and the regression testing page
at
http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting said Also be sure to add the
author of
the patch to the CC.
Dave wrote:
I am trying to read the memory of another process with
ReadProcessmemory and I can only get it to work when
I commit the entire region I want to read with VirtualAllocEx -
but as you probably know when I do this it
initializes the entire memory region to 0s.
So my question is how
Dave Cartright wrote:
I am trying to read the memory of another process with
ReadProcessmemory and I can only get it to work when I commit the
entire region I want to read with VirtualAllocEx - but as you probably
know when I do this it initializes the entire memory region to 0s.
So my
There is a test in derive_key function that fails.
If I put a if condition to make it a todo_wine, it looks loke a hack
and its ugly
As that function is used alot.
---
VJ
On Nov 16, 2007 5:45 PM, Reece Dunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/11/2007, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007, at 6:24 AM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I've opened a bug (which if fixed now btw) and the regression
testing page at
http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting said Also be sure to add
the author of
the patch to the CC.
So this is what I did.
Should
On Nov 17, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a test in derive_key function that fails.
If I put a if condition to make it a todo_wine, it looks loke a hack
and its ugly
As that function is used alot.
---
VJ
On Nov 16, 2007 5:45 PM, Reece Dunn
On Nov 17, 2007 11:45 AM, James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a test in derive_key function that fails.
If I put a if condition to make it a todo_wine, it looks loke a hack
and its ugly
As that
I am trying to read the memory of another process with ReadProcessMemory but I
can only get it to work when I use VirtualAllocEx to commit the region of
memory - problem is (as you very well know) that VirtualAllocEx initializes the
region with 0s. So my question is how do I get
I compiled wine on Solaris using a .spec provided by the people of
http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/
Maybe contact them ?
My version runs quite nice as far as i can see.
Cheers
James Hawkins wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007, at 6:24 AM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I've opened a bug (which if fixed now btw) and the regression
testing page at
http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting said Also be sure to add
the author of
the patch to the CC.
So this
Hi
I have found a regression in wine. a strange one. What is a policy
about posting such regressions, here on malling list?
(Or is regression is worth enough to post it here?)
I don't play that particular game on wine and it's minor bug - but i
have found (via bitsect) that
user32: Cache the
19 matches
Mail list logo
