Vitaly Lipatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lstrcpynW needs size in TCHARS
RegEnumKey needs size in TCHARS
It would be better to change the HCR_GetDefaultVerbW function to take a
len in WCHARs since it's returning a string in all cases.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 16:08:27 Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Hmmm interesting idea. I don't actually know just yet who the
maintainer of the AppDB is, but he/she may respond in this thread
(I'll attempt to find out their email anyway) as to whether or not its
possible to generate a weekly
We need to check context before than refer it.
Changelog:
Check for a context is added
--
Best regards
Anatoly Lyutin.
Hi,
I'm not sure if your patch is correct. The block of code in front of the
if-statement you added should have found or else created a context. If
On Dec 5, 2007 8:20 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Their e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED] They'll have to decide how to track the
changes, but in any case the code should be in soon.
What about downgrades? Regressions happen. It'd be terrible one week
to promise
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 18:13:30 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is my first attempt with ICOM objects. So, all the advices are
welcome.
A few suggestions:
+HRESULT WINAPI ID3DXMatrixStackImpl_QueryInterface(ID3DXMatrixStack *iface,
REFIID riid, void **ppvObject)
+ ...
+
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
I'm not sure if your patch is correct. The block of code in front of the
if-statement you added should have found or else created a context. If
afterwards there is no context it sounds like something went wrong. Returning
NULL isn't correct then.
Brian,
Yep -- i'll be tracking downgrades too. I'm actually writing the code
myself, you'll likely see the results in next weeks issue
--Zach
On Dec 5, 2007 3:30 PM, Brian Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 8:20 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Their
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 17:25:55 schrieb Anatoly Lyutin:
We need to check context before than refer it.
Changelog:
Check for a context is added
Does that happen to fix any game? The idea was that the activeContext pointer
never points to NULL, so a check like that only workaround a
Hi,
I was going through dlls/kernel32/cpu.c and stumbled upon the
functions do_cpuid and have_cpuid.
It seems the assembly code for both the Intel and AMD 64 bit processors.
Is it possible to remove the ifdefs or add the x86_64 ifdef.
And one more question does this change help 64 bit windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Possibly, but on the other hand it could just as easily become Garbage
in the next release of Wine ;)
(sorry, I already sent this once at the start of the day but emailed it
directly to the previous person rather than back to the list)
Ben H.
Tomas
Juan Lang wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 12:52 PM, Michael Stefaniuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Checked with Kai and Dmitry and there is nothing special about
SECUR32_ALLOC(). There are more direct usages of HeapAlloc()
than of the macro so instead of replacing SECUR32_ALLOC() with
heap_alloc() just
I've finished coding a script which runs the necessary query to
generate data (I download a database backup and run the queries on my
local machine.). As a sampling (if anybody feels like tripple
checking that the data is correct) of Upgrades (and some downgrades)
from 11-27-2007 to 12-04-2007:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Looks ok, please submit the patch with a proper Changelog entry.
Thanks for looking into this! Here we go! :-)
ChangeLog:
Correctly handle underflow in IcmpSendEcho(); bug introduced in rev 1.30.
Still using cvs? I guess
Aric Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fonts/system.sfd | 1407
++
1 files changed, 1213 insertions(+), 194 deletions(-)
For some reason widths of many glyphs are changed by this patch,
that doesn't look correct.
--
Dmitry.
Hmmm interesting idea. I don't actually know just yet who the
maintainer of the AppDB is, but he/she may respond in this thread
(I'll attempt to find out their email anyway) as to whether or not its
possible to generate a weekly summary of applications which have been
upgraded through the week?
The problem of using test results as background for this is that they are very
dependent on the experience of each user. For instance some might be unable
to run a game because they have execshield or other stuff that mess up Wine,
or simply because they are not following the how-to
This is great :)
Would it be a good idea to include major news from the appDB?
Ex: Photoshop cs2 has now reached Gold status
I think this would be very inspiring to users.
Tomas
Triton wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:23:10 -0500
Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kai,
It was my
Gerald Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since Alexandre has asked me to take care of overflow in some other
context, I figured I could ping this underflow patch in return. ;-)
Looks ok, please submit the patch with a proper Changelog entry.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have noticed some unusual behavior in the wine-devel mailing list
compared to others (e.g. fedora's, etc.). Wine's wine-devel mailing
list does not automatically set the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is that? If other mailing lists do so, how come Wine's doesn't?
Personally, I find myself
On Thursday 06 December 2007 00:44:03 Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Here are the updated results for when we only look at updates from App
Maintainers. It also just so happens that that age of empires case
you mentioned is in fact by a maintainer. Please respond and leave
your opinion as to which
On Thursday 06 December 2007, King InuYasha wrote:
I have noticed some unusual behavior in the wine-devel mailing list
compared to others (e.g. fedora's, etc.). Wine's wine-devel mailing
list does not automatically set the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it's a client problem. I'm using
Here are the updated results for when we only look at updates from App
Maintainers. It also just so happens that that age of empires case
you mentioned is in fact by a maintainer. Please respond and leave
your opinion as to which is more worthwhile in the WWN. Perhaps i'll
put both in different
Do you feel apps get updated enough that there are enough instances of
an app being reviewed more than once per release to change these
results?
On Dec 5, 2007 6:52 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 00:44:03 Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Here are
Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007, King InuYasha wrote:
I have noticed some unusual behavior in the wine-devel mailing list
compared to others (e.g. fedora's, etc.). Wine's wine-devel mailing
list does not automatically set the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it's
Ahh, too late at night and my attempts to get the widths for the 18
pixel strikes had side effects.
I have resubmitted. Hand checked the widths of the glyphs for both 16
and 18 pixles to make sure they are correct. Had to redraw many of the
18 pixel strikes (The capitals) to get them to fit
James Hawkins wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007, at 7:05 PM, King InuYasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed some unusual behavior in the wine-devel mailing list
compared to others (e.g. fedora's, etc.). Wine's wine-devel mailing
list does not automatically set the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i'd argue that this means we need to be smarter about how we process
the test results. We need both a confidence and a rating and some way
to reflect this in the results.
Your other point about configuration, if users have problems with
configuration then while it may be their fault its not
On Dec 5, 2007, at 7:05 PM, King InuYasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed some unusual behavior in the wine-devel mailing list
compared to others (e.g. fedora's, etc.). Wine's wine-devel mailing
list does not automatically set the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is that? If other
Aric Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, too late at night and my attempts to get the widths for the 18
pixel strikes had side effects.
I have resubmitted. Hand checked the widths of the glyphs for both 16
and 18 pixles to make sure they are correct. Had to redraw many of the
18
On Thursday 06 December 2007 02:05:59 King InuYasha wrote:
I have noticed some unusual behavior in the wine-devel mailing list
compared to others (e.g. fedora's, etc.). Wine's wine-devel mailing
list does not automatically set the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is that? If other mailing lists
On Dec 5, 2007 10:35 PM, Lei Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm moving the current tests into their own function in preparation to
write more tests.
When submitting a numbered patch series, can you put the numbers [x/y]
right after the module name? That makes it easier to spot the
31 matches
Mail list logo
