Hi all,
As you may know yesterday was the pens down for summer of code 2008
Students are still allowed to write code, but it won't count for the
mentors evaluation any more.
I would like to request from the mentors to fill in the final evaluation
form and from the students to give a final writ
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 18:38:18 Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to sneak in a bit of patch cleaning within the new software?
> It would be useful to incidentally remove any trailing white space that
> happens to exist within the scope of a patch.
While I wouldn't mind issuing a wa
Short story:
Patches that touch non-Latin1 .rc files might need to be sent
as attached non-text files rather than inline or as .txt files,
to avoid charset corruption.
Some examples:
http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/059095.html
might suffer corruption (I can't tell offhand).
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two days ago I spoke with xorg devs (Peter Hutterer / Daniel Stone) in
#xorg-devel. In short Xorg 7.5 (guess that will be out during spring next
year) will feature Xinput2. Xinput2 is on the drawing table now and one of
its features will be relative mouse mov
Hello,
I'm translating the winerr messages to Norwegian, but I'm not completely sure
about the LanguageNames line. Should the code be the same as the language ID
(0x414)?
LanguageNames=(NOR=0x414:winerr)
This seems to be the case for English, but not French & German.
Alexander N. Sørnes
Eric Pouech wrote:
> Maarten Lankhorst a écrit :
>
>> Behavioral test to show that wine winmm needs fixing.
>> ---
>>
>>
>>
>>
> this likely is going to fail on old boxes
> there's no requirement on MS side that a PCM
Hi,
Two days ago I spoke with xorg devs (Peter Hutterer / Daniel Stone) in
#xorg-devel. In short Xorg 7.5 (guess that will be out during spring next year)
will feature Xinput2. Xinput2 is on the drawing table now and one of its
features will be relative mouse movement. It is an important featur
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> That's assuming XI2 will be able to send actual mouse (other devices)
>> movements to requesting applications. Right now nothing can (DGA
>> doesn't
>> count it's not available anymore).
> Can you get in contact with the Xorg mailing list on that issue? As far as I
> under
Kai wrote:
>> >> Btw, how does patchwatcher handle that?
>> > Not at all.
>
>Whoops, I just realized this came across rather rude
Nah, that was fine. (Although "it doesn't yet" might have been
clearer.)
> I'm currently trying to get the basic features of the
> patchwatcher to work in buildbot an
Maarten Lankhorst a écrit :
> Behavioral test to show that wine winmm needs fixing.
> ---
>
>
>
this likely is going to fail on old boxes
there's no requirement on MS side that a PCM renderer has to be opened twice
so having i
Hi Hongbo,
it looks like your patch failed to apply because you did not
preserve whitespace exactly. Your patch uses all spaces
for the context, but the file contains tabs, so it does not match,
and patch fails.
- Dan
-- Forwarded message --
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue,
Hi Andrew,
2008/8/19 Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to sneak in a bit of patch cleaning within the new software?
> It would be useful to incidentally remove any trailing white space that
> happens to exist within the scope of a patch.
Patchwatcher currently only loo
> That's assuming XI2 will be able to send actual mouse (other devices)
> movements to requesting applications. Right now nothing can (DGA
> doesn't
> count it's not available anymore).
Can you get in contact with the Xorg mailing list on that issue? As far as I
understand the XI2 plans raw input p
Hi,
Is it possible to sneak in a bit of patch cleaning within the new software? It
would be useful to incidentally remove any trailing white space that happens to
exist within the scope of a patch.
--
Andy.
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Just for the record, I think we really want this patch. XInput 2 is
> currently under development, so we cannot fix the issue properly right
> now. Even if we have XI2, there will still be old X servers around for
> ages.
>
That's assuming XI2 will be able to send actual
Just for the record, I think we really want this patch. XInput 2 is currently
under development, so we cannot fix the issue properly right now. Even if we
have XI2, there will still be old X servers around for ages.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wine-patches-
>
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Looks like there is something (else?) wrong with checking the patch series.
>>
>> None of the last patch series (by Juan, James, Rob, Stefan to name a few)
>> are shown on the results page.
>
> Thanks for
Am 19.08.2008 um 00:41 schrieb James Hawkins:
> when the patch doesn't get committed, you should look back at it
> and really think
> outside the box about what could possibly be wrong with the patch.
Essentially, you ask to change code on unfounded guesses (I did the
best to my knowledge in
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like there is something (else?) wrong with checking the patch series.
>
> None of the last patch series (by Juan, James, Rob, Stefan to name a few)
> are shown on the results page.
Thanks for pointing that out.
It got
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Patchwatcher falsely complained that
> [2/17] richedit: Removed assumption about the order of rtf indent
> didn't apply because the regexp I used to detect
> the end of a patch series falsely matched the
> first patch in a series of 1x patches. Here's the fix:
>
> --- patchwat
20 matches
Mail list logo
