[The original mail seemed to be stuck in the moderation queue or
got lost somewhere else. Reposting with correct From: this
time]
Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2008, 17:14 +0900 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Providing the file handle allows to map
read/write
Hi Mounir,
this morning I have found spare time to do a quick check of the
winscard.dll.so you provided.
So on my 64Bit AMD64 system your .so works fine so far. Maybe we can address
the structure alignment problem during the next weeks/months? Let us see ...
One thing: while
Dan Kegel schrieb:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Rico Schüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some days ago I've send a patch which broke some other tests, see
http://www.kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/274.txt . But this test got
a conformance test ok.
I think patchwatcher should also
2008/8/30 Rico Schüller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
this patch adds the initial scissorrect for d3d9. The improvement from the
last patch is, that it doesn't try to set it for d3d8 and ddraw because both
don't support scissorrects.
Cheers
Rico
I'd rather keep that in wined3d for now.
Henri Verbeet schrieb:
2008/8/30 Rico Schüller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
this patch adds the initial scissorrect for d3d9. The improvement from the
last patch is, that it doesn't try to set it for d3d8 and ddraw because both
don't support scissorrects.
Cheers
Rico
I'd rather keep
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Rico Schüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My patch let the ddraw:d3d.c crash on wine (search for 0x60e52ad9
IWineD3DBaseSwapChainImpl_GetBackBuffer in the log
(http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/274.log)). So it isn't in the
blacklist and shouldn't be
I'm really stumped on why this even works because after writing a test
(attached) and running on windows it shows that ppZStencilSurface IS
getting set to null when D3DERR_NOTFOUND is returned.
Could it be that there is something else behind this problem which is
unrelated to what I have been
Michael Karcher wrote:
[The original mail seemed to be stuck in the moderation queue or
got lost somewhere else. Reposting with correct From: this
time]
Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2008, 17:14 +0900 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Providing the file handle
Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
+static const WCHAR testdirW[] =
{'n','t','d','e','l','e','t','e','f','i','l','e',0};
+static const WCHAR subdirW[] = {'\\','s','u','b',0};
+
+ret = CreateDirectoryW(testdirW, NULL);
You need to create test files and directories in windows temp dir.
+
Hi,
I'm using Wine with xUbuntu and you may be know, the menu and toolbar of
xfce are often visible. So I've looked at xfce forum and saw that wine
doesn't inform xfce that window is fullscreen...
At http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-latest.html, I've
found a
Rico Schüller schrieb:
Hi,
this patch adds the initial scissorrect for d3d9. The improvement from
the last patch is, that it doesn't try to set it for d3d8 and ddraw
because both don't support scissorrects.
Cheers
Rico
Hi,
Sorry to disappoint you but I have a feeling that this is most likely a bug in
Xfce instead of Wine. Our window management code might use some legacy
mechanisms here and there but it works on all window managers (except for this
Xfce issue). A few years ago we had similar issues with
James Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Adam Petaccia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:26 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
I was looking into the recent test failures for
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The slowness on some machines for the install tests comes from the system
restore facility. When 'System Restore' is active you will find a great
number
of system restore points after these tests have run. Adding our
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Adam Petaccia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:26
Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 11:41 -0600 schrieb Vitaliy Margolen:
Almost no programs are calling the Nt* functions directly. But kernel32
functions. So the point about knowing the file handle in return from
NtCreateFile is moot. And kernel32's CreateFile() already prints that
information for
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 11:01 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
I've been experimenting on my XP and Vista boxes and the only way to make the
tests run fast is by stopping 'System Restore'.
It makes sense that this has a huge impact on performance, especially with
the
big number of
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Vitaliy Margolen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
+static const WCHAR testdirW[] =
{'n','t','d','e','l','e','t','e','f','i','l','e',0};
+static const WCHAR subdirW[] = {'\\','s','u','b',0};
+
+ret = CreateDirectoryW(testdirW,
18 matches
Mail list logo
