I don't understand, this patch doesn't cause any regressions on my
machine using the latest git (none of them do). The patch[6/10] is
(nearly) identical to the patch I submitted earlier (which did not
cause regressions). The only difference is in the hash. The next
patch[7/10] changes zero function
2008/9/6 Rico Schüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dan Kegel schrieb:
>> This aborts for me in just five seconds. Can *anyone* run it for
>> an hour without failure? If so, how can I duplicate your setup?
>> - Dan
>>
> d3d9 device: This works with OffscreenRenderingMode = backbuffer or
> pbuffer wit
Dan Kegel schrieb:
> This aborts for me in just five seconds. Can *anyone* run it for
> an hour without failure? If so, how can I duplicate your setup?
> - Dan
>
These tests run without any issue for me (200 times) - in virtual
desktop mode and fbo (haven't checked the default settings yet):
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we are slowly progressing towards a more green test.winehq.org there are
> still some conformance tests that fail either on all platforms or with a
> specific configuration (like IE7).
>
> This email is merely to li
patchwatcher prefers that you post patch series
that apply cleanly to current git, so to keep it
happy, post the whole series.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Scott Lindeneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't you know it. Should I post the whole series to wine-patches
> again or should I just
Wouldn't you know it. Should I post the whole series to wine-patches
again or should I just post the two patch that causes the wineserver
to fail
(I committed a single line to the wrong patch)
~Scott
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch seemed to cau
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This aborts for me in just five seconds. Can *anyone* run it for
> an hour without failure? If so, how can I duplicate your setup?
Ask Alexandre for a Ghost image of his machine. =P
--
Steven Edwards
"There is one thing s
Paul V. wrote:
> As we are slowly progressing towards a more green
> test.winehq.org there are still some conformance tests
> that fail either on all platforms or with a specific configuration (like IE7).
Here's some data.
On my new box (CPU: Core 2 Duo e8400,
graphics: nVidia Corporation GeForce
Hi,
As we are slowly progressing towards a more green test.winehq.org there are
still some conformance tests that fail either on all platforms or with a
specific configuration (like IE7).
This email is merely to list those and see if the SME's can have a look in
these
tests. (I didn't put to
"Jeff Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/dlls/user32/dde_client.c b/dlls/user32/dde_client.c
> index 99e2d1c..cbbf99a 100644
> --- a/dlls/user32/dde_client.c
> +++ b/dlls/user32/dde_client.c
> @@ -632,6 +632,15 @@ static WDML_XACT* WDML_ClientQueueExecute(WDML_CONV*
> pConv, LPVOI
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 20:33:25 Nerv wrote:
> -It seems Windows XP only increments lpdwIndex if the Function returns
> true, so it is fixed if you just look on bSuccess
This patch is likely correct but please do add a test case to prove your
finding.
-Hans
11 matches
Mail list logo
