Dan Kegel wrote:
> Jason wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure Coverity's tool, Prevent, costs money to buy.
>> IIRC if the maintainers of an OSS project ask them to,
>> they will set their http://scan.coverity.com server to
>> run a scan on that project's code and upload
>> the scan results to the web at no c
> AFAIK "splint" is one of the most popular OSS static analysis tools, but I've
> never really used it. Has anyone here used it? On the flawfinder homepage,
> it
> says that splint does deeper analysis than flawfinder. It says it "...works
> somewhat like lint, searching for probable errors; to
Jason wrote:
> I'm pretty sure Coverity's tool, Prevent, costs money to buy.
> IIRC if the maintainers of an OSS project ask them to,
> they will set their http://scan.coverity.com server to
> run a scan on that project's code and upload
> the scan results to the web at no charge
And they in fact
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This fixes these crypt32:chain testGetCertChain tests on Vista and Windows
> 2008.
>
-ok(!ret && GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_DATA,
- "Expected ERROR_INVALID_DATA, got %d\n", GetLastError());
+ok(!ret, "Expecte
Please ignore this patch. It's not ready, and not sure why it was sent yet...
-Austin
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:44:50PM +0100, Rob Shearman wrote:
> 2008/9/5 Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have a few other concerns here:
> > * Why do we need a macro here? I thought it was so that
> > __builtin_object_size() could do its work, but the strcpy() functions
> > above in
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>
>> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>>
>>> Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>>
>>>
Is there any way not to include a regenerated 'configure' script into
a patch but be able to 'git fetch' it when it's changed remotely in
repo?
A
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way not to include a regenerated 'configure' script into
>>> a patch but be able to 'git fetch' it when it's changed remotely in
>>> repo?
>>>
>>> As I see there is no need to patch a 'configure' file in re
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>
>> Is there any way not to include a regenerated 'configure' script into a
>> patch but be able to 'git fetch' it when it's changed remotely in repo?
>>
>> As I see there is no need to patch a 'configure' file in repository
>> since it's always
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Is there any way not to include a regenerated 'configure' script into a
> patch but be able to 'git fetch' it when it's changed remotely in repo?
>
> As I see there is no need to patch a 'configure' file in repository
> since it's always regenerated when 'configure.ac' cha
Is there any way not to include a regenerated 'configure' script into a
patch but be able to 'git fetch' it when it's changed remotely in repo?
As I see there is no need to patch a 'configure' file in repository
since it's always regenerated when 'configure.ac' changed.
Thanks in advance.
Jason Spiro wrote:
> I wrote:
>> [...] msconfig is a simple GUI utility for changing certain Registry
>> settings like AutoRun items and such.
In the meantime: the autoruns.exe tool from the ingenious Sysinternals
Suite (bought by M$) does seem to work on wine, have a look at it..
regards_marcel.
Henri Verbeet schrieb:
> 2008/9/6 Rico Schüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Dan Kegel schrieb:
>>
>>> This aborts for me in just five seconds. Can *anyone* run it for
>>> an hour without failure? If so, how can I duplicate your setup?
>>> - Dan
>>>
>>>
>
>
>> d3d9 device: This wo
Rob Shearman gmail.com> wrote:
> Coverity and Prefast are both static analysis tools with a bit more
> intelligence that identify bad code rather than just using "bad"
> functions.
I'm pretty sure Coverity's tool, Prevent, costs money to buy. IIRC if the
maintainers of an OSS project ask them to
I wrote:
> [...] msconfig is a simple GUI utility for changing certain Registry
> settings like AutoRun items and such.
I used the wrong terminology when I said "AutoRun items". I should've said
"startup items", i.e. HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run items
and other startup items
On 9/6/08, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tests with timeouts
>> ===
>> - dplayx:dplayx fails with a timeout on all windows servers
>
> According to Ismael, he has a few fixes that cut the time needed in
> half. Ismael, what's the status on this?
>
> http://winehq.org/
"Johan Dahlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +typedef HRESULT WINAPI (*DLLREGISTER) (void);
> +typedef HRESULT WINAPI (*DLLINSTALL) (BOOL,LPCWSTR);
This is still not right, have a look at other places that use pointers
to the exported win32 APIs.
> +typedef enum {
> + ROEF_DIS
That test almost always fails, but you managed to get
it to fail in two new ways. patchwatcher has a novelty
filter, and ignores known failure messages. Since
your code triggered new,different failure messages,
it got flagged. It's possible that the new failure mode
is semirare, so you might hav
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>> +if (pData == NULL)
>> +{
>> +if (cbData == (DWORD)-1)
>> +pConv->instance->lastError = DMLERR_INVALIDPARAMETER;
>> +else
>> +pConv->instance->lastError = DMLERR_MEMORY_ERROR;
>> +return NULL;
>> +}
>
> Alexandre
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we are slowly progressing towards a more green test.winehq.org there are
>> still some conformance tests that fail either on all platforms or with a
>> specific configuration (like IE7).
>>
2008/9/7 James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This improves the error reporting for the hlink tests.
>
> I think you need to think this one over. Why would we care to display
> the expected data, when the expected data is in
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This improves the error reporting for the hlink tests.
>
I think you need to think this one over. Why would we care to display
the expected data, when the expected data is in the tests? For simple
tests, e.g. last errors or
Henri Verbeet schrieb:
> 2008/9/6 Rico Schüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Dan Kegel schrieb:
>>
>>> This aborts for me in just five seconds. Can *anyone* run it for
>>> an hour without failure? If so, how can I duplicate your setup?
>>> - Dan
>>>
>>>
>
>
>> d3d9 device: This wo
With regards to the info with patch [7/10] I see that it still fails
on patchwatcher, but patchwatcher ignores those. Does this mean that
it was causing this regression on patchwatcher before and that i never
noticed them because of a different regression? They still don't cause
regressions on my s
24 matches
Mail list logo
