Re: advapi32/tests: Run a test on more platforms.

2008-10-27 Thread Nicolas Le Cam
Hi, Should I consider second solution ? Or perhaps adding a comment explaining why we use the second provider type key would be enough ? Original patch is available at [1] for reference. [1] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-October/063475.html Bye, Nicolas Le Cam 2008/10/20 Ni

Re: ws2_32: set correct error if lpOverlapped has an event of NULL and lpCompletionRoutine is also NULL

2008-10-27 Thread Aric Stewart
Ignore this please. -aric Aric Stewart wrote: > --- > dlls/ws2_32/socket.c |2 ++ > dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 32 > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > >

Re: winecfg - great job!

2008-10-27 Thread Zachary Goldberg
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Eric Anopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just read the following in the WWN: > > "The overall 'Wine Experience' was discussed next. As a whole everybody > agrees that it is ugly. Winecfg is arcane, there are tons of nonsense > fixmes, very little 'newb

winecfg - great job!

2008-10-27 Thread Eric Anopolsky
Hi, I just read the following in the WWN: "The overall 'Wine Experience' was discussed next. As a whole everybody agrees that it is ugly. Winecfg is arcane, there are tons of nonsense fixmes, very little 'newbie guidance' and overall a small chance of success on the first try. Devs do care about

Re: does anyone else's windows 98 machine not survive the user32 msg test?

2008-10-27 Thread Francois Gouget
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Vincent Povirk wrote: > After I run "user32_crosstest msg" on my windows 98 virtual machine in > qemu, it no longer responds to any mouse input (the cursor moves and > changes, but clicking has no effect). This seems to be caused by > calling DefWindowProcA directly with WM_SY

Re: does anyone else's windows 98 machine not survive the user32 msg test?

2008-10-27 Thread Paul Vriens
Jeff Zaroyko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> James Hawkins wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Vincent Povirk >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After I run c on my windows 98 virtual machine in qemu, it no longer responds to any mo

Re: does anyone else's windows 98 machine not survive the user32 msg test?

2008-10-27 Thread Jeff Zaroyko
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Hawkins wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Vincent Povirk >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> After I run "user32_crosstest msg" on my windows 98 virtual machine in >>> qemu, it no longer responds to any mouse in

Re: does anyone else's windows 98 machine not survive the user32 msg test?

2008-10-27 Thread James Hawkins
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Hawkins wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Vincent Povirk >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> After I run "user32_crosstest msg" on my windows 98 virtual machine in >>> qemu, it no longer responds to any m