On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Massimo Del Fedele m...@veneto.com wrote:
Roderick Colenbrander ha scritto:
I haven't still any clue if the way I started the DIB engine has the
correct approach, I mean if I should follow this way with the hope to
have it included in main tree or not Can
2009/1/4 Michael Karcher w...@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de:
diff --git a/tools/widl/proxy.c b/tools/widl/proxy.c
index f0e3f1d..0e5cbaf 100644
--- a/tools/widl/proxy.c
+++ b/tools/widl/proxy.c
@@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ int needs_null_check(const var_t *v)
if (type)
{
+ if
2009/1/4 Michael Karcher w...@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de:
This eliminates the wrong null pointer check for pointers to interfaces.
This isn't correct. Object pointers are generated, I believe, in the
case where we have an [in, out] unique pointer, since if the pointer
has been set to NULL the
Damjan wrote:
ssize_t ignored;
...
ignored = write(*(This-fd), event, sizeof(event));
You could make the ignored variable static, maybe even global.
Please don't. We don't want to ignore the errors,
we want to handle them. The changes you're
proposing are harmful to readability. Better
to
Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 11:06 +0600 schrieb titon barua:
GCC is complaining about the ignored return value.
As the code says /* we dont care */ but gcc prints warnings, is it ok
with just
if (write(*(This-fd), event, sizeof(event)));
Gcc wont complain and the code is as before?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Damjan wrote:
ssize_t ignored;
...
ignored = write(*(This-fd), event, sizeof(event));
You could make the ignored variable static, maybe even global.
Please don't. We don't want to ignore the errors,
we want to handle them. The
Michael Karcher w...@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de writes:
This is still not complete. No NULL pointer checks are emitted for parameters
that are aliases to pointers or arrays.
This adds checks in places where midl doesn't have them. It breaks the
service tests for instance.
--
Alexandre
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:45 PM, titon barua titani...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:47 +0100, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 11:06 +0600 schrieb titon barua:
GCC is complaining about the ignored return value.
As the code says /* we dont care */ but gcc
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:10:05 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
Warning: mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: User winehq
already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in /home/
winehq/opt/appdb/include/query.php on line 82
Database error, please try again soon: User
+if (FIXME_ON(ole))
+{
+FIXME(Unknown magic %04x, %d read bytes:\n,magic,xread);
+hr=E_FAIL;
This changes the behavior of the call based on what debug channels are
enabled. I don't think you want to do that.
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:47 +0100, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 11:06 +0600 schrieb titon barua:
GCC is complaining about the ignored return value.
As the code says /* we dont care */ but gcc prints warnings, is it ok
with just
if (write(*(This-fd), event,
Hi,
diff --git a/dlls/wow32/wow32.spec b/dlls/wow32/wow32.spec
index 227120b..4d2d6d1 100644
--- a/dlls/wow32/wow32.spec
+++ b/dlls/wow32/wow32.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# ordinal exports
-1 stdcall WOWGetDescriptor(long long)
+1 stdcall -nonanme WOWGetDescriptor(long long)
spelling
Hi,
I started a discussion inside AppDB about the in my eyes strange
Gold rating of Fallout 3 (it's actually just an example, other entries
suffer the same problems). I know there was a discussion about the
rating on this list last month, but as far as I could see my
particular issue wasn't
Björn Krombholz wrote:
Hi,
I started a discussion inside AppDB about the in my eyes strange
Gold rating of Fallout 3 (it's actually just an example, other entries
suffer the same problems). I know there was a discussion about the
rating on this list last month, but as far as I could see my
2009/1/6 Björn Krombholz fox@gmail.com:
Hi,
I started a discussion inside AppDB about the in my eyes strange
Gold rating of Fallout 3
--snip--
The basic point is: Fallout 3 (a game) only works with a small -- but
nevertheless -- patch, otherwise it will crash, no matter what
Hello,
can anyone tell me where to find information about the b3DAccelerationExists
and b3DAccelerationEnabled properties in the display container returned by
dxdiagn.dll and when they are supposed to be false or true?
In fact, MSDN does not seem to provide information about any of the
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Jeff Zaroyko jeffzaro...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/6 Björn Krombholz fox@gmail.com:
Gold means [...] you've modified Wine to make it work, ie
there is a work around that makes the application work flawlessly.
There's no reason to exclude modifying Wine, you
I updated
http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64
to no longer recommend pulling from Maarten's tree,
since doing so made the instructions more complex, and
the main tree does just about as good at
passing conformance tests (maybe modulo a hang or two).
- Dan
19 matches
Mail list logo
