--- On Thu, 22/1/09, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone managed to concoct a Google Alert that reliably
picks up
most or all articles about Wine the software, but without a
zilliion
articles about wine the drink?
I use wine linux - I know wine is not just for linux, but most
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:48:34 +
Darragh Bailey fe...@compsoc.nuigalway.ie wrote:
Warcraft III and Frozen Throne expansion was released to support Windows
98/ME/2k/XP. Nowhere in it's patch notes does it say that the minimum
requirements to run Warcraft 3 have changed to have the minimum
--- On Thu, 22/1/09, Brian Vincent brian.vinc...@gmail.com wrote:
snipped
LWN is definitely receptive to any articles. Things that
come to mind
would be an article describing Wine being used to get a
specific
Windows program to run. For example, how you could use
Wine to make
iTunes run
--- On Thu, 1/22/09, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com
From: Joris Huizer jorishui...@debian.(none)
Your e-mail is messed up in the patches. Alexandre's
scripts take the
patch info over the e-mail headers, so you should fix that.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:56:50PM +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
2009/1/22 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Ben Klein wrote:
[...]
Perhaps the question remains, is a VC7 runtime library intended to be
developed and shipped with Wine? I don't think this is the case.
We have
Paul Vriens wrote:
Some called functions assume that buffer is always on heap. That isn't
the case
anymore.
If you do
+local_buffer = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, buffer_size);
shouldn't there be a HeapFree() added to match?
Jeff
Jeff Latimer wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Some called functions assume that buffer is always on heap. That isn't
the case
anymore.
If you do
+local_buffer = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, buffer_size);
shouldn't there be a HeapFree() added to match?
Jeff
Your totally
Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com writes:
+static void get_process_affinity( struct process *process )
+{
+affinity_t affinity = ~0;
+
+#ifdef HAVE_SCHED_H
+if (process-unix_pid != -1)
+{
+cpu_set_t set;
+
+CPU_ZERO( set );
+if (!sched_getaffinity(
Yep. I switched to mingw as cross-compiler, and all is right with the
world again ;)
Thanks everyone!
-rino
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Hin-Tak Leung
hintak_le...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
--- On Tue, 20/1/09, Rino Farina rinofar...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, I wasn't able to find iostream among
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067564.html
Any comment on this one? Related to bug 15616.
Hi,
I've been in touch with David Maxwell and he looked into the 'lack' of
reports since the end of October.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:44:45PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
I've been in touch with David Maxwell and he looked into the 'lack' of
reports since the end of October.
And there is now Run 278 :)
Ciao, Marcus
(Damnit, gmail interface)
Pipermail shows as empty, here.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067564.html
Any comment on this one? Related to bug 15616.
--
Adys
2009/1/24 Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com:
(Damnit, gmail interface)
Pipermail shows as empty, here.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067564.html
Any comment on this one? Related to
... and here are the new issues since the last run, all of type FORWARD_NULL.
If you don't have coverity access, see
http://scan.coverity.com/devfaq.html#account
for how to get it.
595 CryptDecodeObjectEx dlls/crypt32/decode.c
596 CryptEncodeObjectEx dlls/crypt32/encode.c
549
2009/1/24 Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com:
Ben Klein a écrit :
2009/1/24 Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com:
(Damnit, gmail interface)
Pipermail shows as empty, here.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:42:38PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
... and here are the new issues since the last run, all of type FORWARD_NULL.
If you don't have coverity access, see
http://scan.coverity.com/devfaq.html#account
for how to get it.
595 CryptDecodeObjectEx
Ben Klein a écrit :
2009/1/24 Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com:
Ben Klein a écrit :
2009/1/24 Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com:
(Damnit, gmail interface)
Pipermail shows as empty, here.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de wrote:
There are actually more ... 815 - 870 (ca 57), and other types too.
Whoops, right, I only got the first page, I guess. Here's a more complete list.
For more info, get a coverity account at
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ben Klein a écrit :
2009/1/24 Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com:
Ben Klein a écrit :
2009/1/24 Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com:
(Damnit, gmail interface)
Pipermail shows as empty, here.
On Fri, Jan 23,
2009/1/24 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ben Klein a écrit :
I just looked at bug 15616. Maybe you should look at it too.
Also, please hit Reply to all so your message gets sent to the
mailing list too
Austin English a écrit :
Of course... Austin English already noticed my patch. Austin, any idea
why it was rejected?
Sorry for the reply to all, I forgot it this time...
I don't know. I only noticed the empty patch. AJ would be the one to ask.
Off hand though, I'd say if you're
Ben Klein a écrit :
2009/1/24 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ben Klein a écrit :
I just looked at bug 15616. Maybe you should look at it too.
Also, please hit Reply to all so your
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ben Klein a écrit :
2009/1/24 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ben Klein a écrit :
I just looked at bug 15616. Maybe you
I have resubmitted this patch for discussion purposes.
Patch user32/tests: Clarify the msgs to differentiate Unicode and ASCII
in tests cleans up existing tests for this situation and demonstrates
the functionality.
The problem remains that the application passes to the dde/ddeml data
that is
Jeff Latimer l...@yless4u.com.au wrote:
The issue is that the client passes data using messaging or DDEML there
is no method in the api to inform the server whether the data is Unicode
or not. The only method I have determined is to use IsTextUnicode() but
that is guessing. However, it
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Jeff Latimer l...@yless4u.com.au wrote:
The issue is that the client passes data using messaging or DDEML
there is no method in the api to inform the server whether the data
is Unicode or not. The only method I have determined is to use
IsTextUnicode() but that is
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Vincent Povirk
madewokherd+8...@gmail.com wrote:
In several cases we call delete_element(x) after x has been set to
NULL or after an unsuccessful clone_element(y, x) call. clone_element
always gives a NULL element pointer when it fails.
delete_element(NULL)
Jeff Latimer l...@yless4u.com.au wrote:
Passing raw DDE messages should be
out of interest, it's the application's problem.
DDE and DDEML are supposed to interchangeable. A DDE client can talk to
a DDEML server and turnabout.
DDEML is just a wrapper around raw DDE messages, and raw DDE
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com wrote:
@@ -2990,7 +2989,13 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI
fnIMultiLanguage2_ValidateCodePageEx(
DWORD dwfIODControl)
{
ICOM_THIS_MULTI(MLang_impl, vtbl_IMultiLanguage3, iface);
-FIXME(%p %u %p %08x: stub!\n, This, uiCodePage, hwnd, dwfIODControl);
+
30 matches
Mail list logo
