On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Hans Leidekker h...@meelstraat.net wrote:
Office 2007 SP1 installer depends on this.
Please write a test case.
--
James Hawkins
This definitely needs a test.
--
James Hawkins
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Hans Leidekker h...@meelstraat.net wrote:
diff --git a/dlls/fusion/asmname.c b/dlls/fusion/asmname.c
index acf0411..ebf76af 100644
--- a/dlls/fusion/asmname.c
+++ b/dlls/fusion/asmname.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
It would be a lot easier if you just took over my patches that
implement this properly:
[PATCH 1/3] fusion: Implement the IAssemblyEnum interface. [try4]
http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/066994.html
[PATCH 2/3] fusion: Add tests for the IAssemblyEnum interface. [try4]
Fix how? Both cases should be accepted...
--
James Hawkins
2009/2/13 Hans Leidekker h...@meelstraat.net:
diff --git a/dlls/msi/action.c b/dlls/msi/action.c
index fd38f7a..38d2484 100644
--- a/dlls/msi/action.c
+++ b/dlls/msi/action.c
@@ -5870,11 +5870,11 @@ static UINT
On Friday 13 February 2009 09:22:31 James Hawkins wrote:
Office 2007 SP1 installer depends on this.
Please write a test case.
Sure. Note that it's documented here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/556041
-Hans
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Hans Leidekker h...@codeweavers.com wrote:
On Friday 13 February 2009 09:22:31 James Hawkins wrote:
Office 2007 SP1 installer depends on this.
Please write a test case.
Sure. Note that it's documented here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/556041
No
On Friday 13 February 2009 09:26:03 James Hawkins wrote:
This definitely needs a test.
Patch [5/5] has a test that depends on this.
-Hans
On Friday 13 February 2009 09:31:54 James Hawkins wrote:
It would be a lot easier if you just took over my patches that
implement this properly:
Hmm, I missed those. I'll integrate them with mine.
-Hans
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Hans Leidekker h...@codeweavers.com wrote:
On Friday 13 February 2009 09:31:54 James Hawkins wrote:
It would be a lot easier if you just took over my patches that
implement this properly:
Hmm, I missed those. I'll integrate them with mine.
Thanks!
--
Juan Lang wrote:
I think that these failures are also because of not enough rights
(people running winetest as a normal user). So just removing them is
probably not the best approach?
Maybe it's not that there are not enough rights. The common denominator that
I see is that all reports/boxes
Jeremiah Flerchinger jeremiah.flerchin...@gmail.com wrote:
Explorer.exe now calls ShellDdeInit. Progman stubs will now be started/used
in Shell32.
Amazingly any apps with a Progman DDE interface will also be called. Shell32
can handle
all major functionality, but a running progman.exe (for
Hi!
Does anybody have a problem compilling the crosstest of ole32?
Or maybe it's only my fault?
I have:
usrmarshal.cross.o: In function `func_usrmarshal':
/srv/vitperov/Projects/wine-dev/dlls/ole32/tests/usrmarshal.c:445: undefined
reference to `_wdtpinterfacepointer_users...@20'
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Dan Kegel wrote:
What with netbooks with small screens abounding, it
might make sense to review our web site and make sure
its most important parts are usable in an 800x600 screen
(easy to simulate, just resize your browser until xwininfo
says it's 800x550, those gnome
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:01:35PM +0300, Vitaly Perov wrote:
Hi!
Does anybody have a problem compilling the crosstest of ole32?
Or maybe it's only my fault?
I have:
usrmarshal.cross.o: In function `func_usrmarshal':
/srv/vitperov/Projects/wine-dev/dlls/ole32/tests/usrmarshal.c:445:
On Friday 13 February 2009 14:18:17 Huw Davies wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:01:35PM +0300, Vitaly Perov wrote:
Hi!
Does anybody have a problem compilling the crosstest of ole32?
Or maybe it's only my fault?
I have:
usrmarshal.cross.o: In function `func_usrmarshal':
2009/2/13 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Dan Kegel wrote:
What with netbooks with small screens abounding, it
might make sense to review our web site and make sure
its most important parts are usable in an 800x600 screen
(easy to simulate, just resize your browser
( sorry for re-post - first response go only to Dan Kegel )
on short - that means a lot of scroll OR to split too big contents like :
Title
Content
asdfsdaf
sadfsadf
sadfsadfs
sad 4545
fsdf sadf
sdfsdfsadf
part 1 link, part 2 link ( page bottom )
it could be done with jQuery
also for 800x600
2009/2/13 SorinN nemes.so...@gmail.com:
it could be done with jQuery
I hear this a lot. Is it really such a good idea? I'd argue a site not
requiring Javascript to function is much cleaner, friendlier and more
accessible.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/13 SorinN nemes.so...@gmail.com:
it could be done with jQuery
I hear this a lot. Is it really such a good idea? I'd argue a site not
requiring Javascript to function is much cleaner, friendlier and more
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/13 SorinN nemes.so...@gmail.com:
it could be done with jQuery
I hear this a lot. Is it really such a good idea? I'd argue a site not
requiring Javascript to function is much cleaner, friendlier and more
accessible.
Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com writes:
@@ -231,7 +231,9 @@ static void test_LZOpenFileA_existing_compressed(void)
file = LZOpenFileA(_terminated, test, OF_EXIST);
ok(file = 0, LZOpenFileA failed on switching to a compressed file
name\n);
ok(test.cBytes == sizeof(OFSTRUCT) ||
-
Years ago I was a happy CLI user - but for nornal browsers Javascript
is OK - for non JS browsers - a noscript version of the website can be
generated - and long page content can be arranged in part1, part2, etc
- accessible via bottom links
2009/2/13 Seth Shelnutt shelnu...@gmail.com:
On Fri,
Eddie Leung eddie.leung.2...@anderson.ucla.edu writes:
diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/dc.c b/dlls/gdi32/dc.c
index c8a3c4c..44a9a6f 100644
--- a/dlls/gdi32/dc.c
+++ b/dlls/gdi32/dc.c
@@ -1433,7 +1433,7 @@ static BOOL WINAPI call_dc_hook16( HDC hdc, WORD code,
DWORD_PTR data, LPARAM lP
Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alist...@hotmail.com writes:
Hi,
Changelog:
urlmon: Corrected tests
Please write a better description. Corrected tests applies to every
test commit.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de writes:
CID 119, 188, resubmit with working patch from earlier round.
I guess we could also just let it crash if this happens, but
I am not feeling comfortable.
These are internal functions, it doesn't make sense to call them with
NULL.
--
Alexandre
2009/2/12 Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com:
Hi Paul,
This is of course on boxes where people dont' run winetest as a
administrator. I'm not sure if ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED is thus actually an
acceptable failure. In other tests we have used skip() for this.
Of course that's the reason, but not
2009/2/13 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com:
2009/2/13 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Dan Kegel wrote:
What with netbooks with small screens abounding, it
might make sense to review our web site and make sure
its most important parts are usable in an 800x600 screen
(easy
Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote:
What with netbooks with small screens abounding, it
might make sense to review our web site and make sure
its most important parts are usable in an 800x600 screen
For what it's worth, most netbooks have a 1024x600 resolution (all the
9 and 10 ones as
Rob Shearman wrote:
2009/2/12 Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com:
Hi Paul,
This is of course on boxes where people dont' run winetest as a
administrator. I'm not sure if ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED is thus actually an
acceptable failure. In other tests we have used skip() for this.
Of course that's the
Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com writes:
I sent out an email earlier to ask if we should include more information in
the
header of the report. We could use that information, if this change will be
accepted by AJ, to limit the reporting only to boxes were we have admin
rights.
As
Hi,
For those not monitoring slashdot [1], there is an article [2] that is
comparing the Google V8 benchmark on Windows and Linux versions of
Firefox 3.
The result of this is that the Windows and Wine runs are pretty close
(241 vs 227) when compared to the Linux run (181) and Opera (155).
I
Anything wrong with that?
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-February/069267.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-February/069273.html
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Reece Dunn mscl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
For those not monitoring slashdot [1], there is an article [2] that is
comparing the Google V8 benchmark on Windows and Linux versions of
Firefox 3.
The result of this is that the Windows and Wine runs are pretty
2009/2/13 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Reece Dunn mscl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
For those not monitoring slashdot [1], there is an article [2] that is
comparing the Google V8 benchmark on Windows and Linux versions of
Firefox 3.
The result
Hi,
For those not monitoring slashdot [1], there is an article [2] that is
comparing the Google V8 benchmark on Windows and Linux versions of
Firefox 3.
The result of this is that the Windows and Wine runs are pretty close
(241 vs 227) when compared to the Linux run (181) and Opera (155).
I
2009/2/11 Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
there are a number of tests at test.winehq.org that indicate that
they're timed out or crashed. The difficulty is, I have no access to
machines running the version of Windows on which the test is timing
out or failing, and the data about the
Something like the attached patch?
Hoo, that'd be worlds better. Thanks, Rob!
--Juan
Hi all, I've written a patch which should fix the failing advapi32
cred tests that mirrors the skips in the existing tests:
diff --git a/dlls/advapi32/tests/cred.c b/dlls/advapi32/tests/cred.c
index 58103c6..bb6935b 100644
--- a/dlls/advapi32/tests/cred.c
+++ b/dlls/advapi32/tests/cred.c
@@
2009/2/13 Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com:
Hi all, I've written a patch which should fix the failing advapi32
cred tests that mirrors the skips in the existing tests:
diff --git a/dlls/advapi32/tests/cred.c b/dlls/advapi32/tests/cred.c
index 58103c6..bb6935b 100644
---
2009/2/13 Susan Cragin susancra...@earthlink.net:
Hi,
For those not monitoring slashdot [1], there is an article [2] that is
comparing the Google V8 benchmark on Windows and Linux versions of
Firefox 3.
The result of this is that the Windows and Wine runs are pretty close
(241 vs 227) when
No, CRED_PERSIST_LOCAL_MACHINE should be fine but does this change
make any difference? I believe the ERROR_NO_SUCH_LOGON_SESSION is
returned when the tests are being run as a user that doesn't have a
profile, and therefore the credentials manager doesn't have anywhere
to store the
Hi Jeremy, a couple comments:
-pImageInfo-XResolution.Whole = -1;
+if (sane_option_get_int(activeDS.deviceHandle, resolution,
resolution) == SANE_STATUS_GOOD)
+pImageInfo-XResolution.Whole =
pImageInfo-YResolution.Whole = resolution;
(snip)
+/* Option functions */
Hi again, Jeremy,
With this change, sane.ds will not compile unless SONAME_LIBSANE is
defined.
This remark is incorrect, sorry. I only read the patch, I didn't read
ds_image.c first. This change is correct.
The other comment is, is adding a new file (option.c) really
necessary? If you're
Hi Juan,
The other comment is, is adding a new file (option.c) really
necessary? If you're planning to expand it a lot, perhaps, but just
for this one small function it looks like overkill to me.
This remark still stands.
Yes, I am planning on expanding options.c a fair amount,
and I'm
Hi Christoph,
-/* @@ Wine registry key: HKCU\Software\Wine\MSHTML */
-res = RegOpenKeyW(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, mshtml_keyW, hkey);
-if(res != ERROR_SUCCESS)
-return FALSE;
-
file_name = heap_alloc(size+sizeof(GECKO_FILE_NAME));
-res = RegQueryValueExA(hkey, GeckoCabDir,
From: Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com writes:
I sent out an email earlier to ask if we should include more
information in the header of the report. We could use that
information, if this change will be accepted by AJ, to
limit the
Austin English wrote:
Needed by photoshop cs4. See bug 16385.
diff --git a/dlls/atmlib/atmlib_main.c b/dlls/atmlib/atmlib_main.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..bb17989
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dlls/atmlib/atmlib_main.c
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+ * MSSIGN32 implementation
+ *
+ *
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com wrote:
Austin English wrote:
Needed by photoshop cs4. See bug 16385.
diff --git a/dlls/atmlib/atmlib_main.c b/dlls/atmlib/atmlib_main.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..bb17989
--- /dev/null
+++
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com wrote:
Austin English wrote:
Needed by photoshop cs4. See bug 16385.
diff --git a/dlls/atmlib/atmlib_main.c b/dlls/atmlib/atmlib_main.c
new file
2009/2/13 Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com:
+if (CompareStringW(GetThreadLocale(), NORM_IGNORECASE, ptr, 6,
+ szDomain, 6) == 2)
LOCALE_INVARIANT should be used when comparing with a constant string.
See here for the reasons why:
2009/2/13 Reece Dunn mscl...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
For those not monitoring slashdot [1], there is an article [2] that is
comparing the Google V8 benchmark on Windows and Linux versions of
Firefox 3.
The result of this is that the Windows and Wine runs are pretty close
(241 vs 227) when
Hello,
I have created a small library to allow Win32 applications running
under Wine to load native Unix shared libraries (.so). First (one-hour
hack) version is available at
http://martin.hinner.info/tmp/winegate.tar.gz ; Please consider
inclusion in WINE tree (dll/ directory). Please note
2009/2/14 Martin Hinner mar...@hinner.info:
Purpose of this Wine DLL is to allow Windows applications to use
directly Unix library functions. This is useful for example for
applications which talk to specific drivers and it's not
efficient/possible to create system native DLL for such
I know, when I wrote Winetricks, I meant it as a developers'
tool only. But... then... people started using it, and
it made sense to provide it as a way to download missing
visual C++ runtimes etc. for average users.
Quite a few newbies trip over the fact that it
needs cabextract installed.
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/14 Martin Hinner mar...@hinner.info:
Purpose of this Wine DLL is to allow Windows applications to use
directly Unix library functions. This is useful for example for
applications which talk to specific drivers
2009/2/14 Martin Hinner mar...@hinner.info:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/14 Martin Hinner mar...@hinner.info:
Purpose of this Wine DLL is to allow Windows applications to use
directly Unix library functions. This is useful for example for
Very interesting.
I'd been suggesting to ISVs that they create a single
winelib dll and conditionally load that if present,
but winegate.dll might be an appealing alternative.
I don't think this really brings up any security considerations
but it is a reminder that Windows programs under Wine
57 matches
Mail list logo
