On Thursday 14 May 2009 02:02, Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
> I started fixing failures against test suite.
> Most of bitmap ones are fixed, remaining are due
> to still stubbed funcs.
>
> Now the problem is that it fixed also most todo_wines on bitmap suite
>
> As usual, on bug 421 page for wh
I started fixing failures against test suite.
Most of bitmap ones are fixed, remaining are due
to still stubbed funcs.
Now the problem is that it fixed also most todo_wines on bitmap suite
As usual, on bug 421 page for who wants to test it.
Ciao
Max
ooh! shiny! thank you! Too bad it doesn't work with +all. I suppose I can
just list them out individually in my WINEDEBUG though.
--- On Wed, 5/13/09, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
From: Roderick Colenbrander
Subject: Re: Dynamically adding debug channels (__wine_dbg_set_channel_flags)
To: da
Thank you all very much for the clarification, it is exceedingly helpful! I
don't care to look at microsoft's code because I doubt I have the stomach for
it! But now I feel much better, that I wasn't doing anything wrong by
examining the program state of the misbehaving app (it was on wine any
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> I thought reverse engineering was only relevant to MS code? As in
> reverse engineering of windows dlls and so on; another application
> would be irrelevant.
>
> That's what I understood from it anyway.
First of all I'm not a lawyer ;)
2009/5/13 Daniel Santos
> I was recently attempting to isolate the cause of a hang in Lord of the
> Rings Online and had it in a debugger. I mentioned this on IRC and was told
> that I was "reverse engineering" and any patch I came up with would not be
> accepted. I find this rather confusing a
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Steven, sorry for the slow response, I got tied up in some other stuff. But
> now back to fun. =) And thanks for your response!
>
> The application is Lord of the Rings Online. They don't use normal version
> numbers, so this bug actually
I thought reverse engineering was only relevant to MS code? As in
reverse engineering of windows dlls and so on; another application
would be irrelevant.
That's what I understood from it anyway.
J.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Santos
wrote:
> I was recently attempting to isolate the
I was recently attempting to isolate the cause of a hang in Lord of the Rings
Online and had it in a debugger. I mentioned this on IRC and was told that I
was "reverse engineering" and any patch I came up with would not be accepted.
I find this rather confusing and would like to better underst
Steven, sorry for the slow response, I got tied up in some other stuff. But
now back to fun. =) And thanks for your response!
The application is Lord of the Rings Online. They don't use normal version
numbers, so this bug actually started with "Book 14". In Book 14, the problem
would manife
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:01 PM, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Austin English
> wrote:
>> Howdy all,
>>
>> I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
>> with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
>> using AutoHotKey
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Austin English
wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
> with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
> using AutoHotKey to both run all the tests and parse the logs for
> failures/pass
Howdy all,
I've been working on the test suite. I've got a few basic tests set up
with notepad, and I'm currently working on setting up the framework,
using AutoHotKey to both run all the tests and parse the logs for
failures/passing todo's.
For those interested, here's the first 'real' script I'
Hi,
While going over some just committed patches of mine I saw (again) that
we now have some tests that do:
ok(ret || broken(!ret), "call failed")
The good thing is that tests succeed on all Windows versions and will
fail if Wine returns !ret. The bad thing is that changes in the Windows
implem
NS_GetOtherMagic is probably safe to remove.
NS_GetNsMagic was only used in some hackish code that tried to reverse
engineer dplay protocol. I removed that code that used it, but don't
know if it'll be needed in a future.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2
(I accidentally only sent this message to Rob only)
Hi,
To get away from the tests stuff I thought I'd resurrect my plans to
implement EnumServiceStatusExW (the A-version is needed by SysInternal's
Process Explorer amongst others).
I have most of the stuff ready:
- Added svcctl_EnumServicesSta
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I don't have gcc 4.5 to test this, but you could try using a function
> instead, something like this:
>
> diff --git a/include/winnt.h b/include/winnt.h
> index abcc502..aaa4112 100644
> --- a/include/winnt.h
> +++ b/include/winnt.h
> @@ -292,7 +292
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 10:38:08 Francois Gouget wrote:
Personally I think we should just kill all that unused code and be done with
it. Currently the only way to get a working dplay implementation is to use
the native dlls anyway. Our version has been bit-rotting for quite some time.
Cheers,
Hans Leidekker writes:
> +if ((ret = GetDiskFreeSpaceA(path, &cluster_sectors, §or_bytes,
> &free_clusters, &total_clusters)))
> +{
> +if (cluster_size) *cluster_size = 1;
> +if (free) *free = free_clusters * cluster_sectors * sector_bytes;
> +if (total) *total =
19 matches
Mail list logo
