On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Roderick
Colenbranderthunderbir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Reece,
The only thing required is a git version of Wine and XRender libraries
on your system. After that any app can be tested. On decent drivers
like Nvidia you'll notice heavily improved 2D performance
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Roderick
Colenbranderthunderbir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For some weeks I have been working on moving more 2D rendering to
XRender. XRender has three advantages for Wine. First of all it allows
us to perform more rendering operations using X which we previously
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Austin Englishaustinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Roderick
Colenbranderthunderbir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For some weeks I have been working on moving more 2D rendering to
XRender. XRender has three advantages for Wine. First of
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com wrote:
@@ -5792,6 +5792,9 @@ static BOOL load_child_font(GdiFont *font, CHILD_FONT
*child)
child-font-scale_y = font-scale_y;
hfontlist = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, sizeof(*hfontlist));
hfontlist-hfont = CreateFontIndirectW(font-font_desc.lf);
load_child_font calls neither WineEngCreateFontInstance nor GetEnumStructs.
It allocates the the child font structure above in the function sets the
few fields it thinks it needs and then goes on. I see no evidence that
it is being expected to have been set at any other point.
-aric
Dmitry
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com wrote:
load_child_font calls neither WineEngCreateFontInstance nor GetEnumStructs.
It allocates the the child font structure above in the function sets the
few fields it thinks it needs and then goes on. I see no evidence that
it is being expected to have
Thanks, resent.
-aric
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Aric Stewart a...@codeweavers.com wrote:
load_child_font calls neither WineEngCreateFontInstance nor
GetEnumStructs.
It allocates the the child font structure above in the function sets
the few fields it thinks it needs and then goes on. I see
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Jacek Cabanj...@itma.pwr.wroc.pl wrote:
Hi,
It's time for the new Wine Gecko package release. I've prepared a new
package based on Mozilla code a bit newer than Firefox 3.5 and my fixes
(most of them are on their way to mainstream Mozilla repository). This
I have seen patches in that bug report to add the firewall stubs. Is there
any problem with those patches?
Or, more to the point, is there any way I could contribute? I am not too
familiar with the firewall API or Marteen's work, but I am sure that can be
mitigated with some study :)
I might
Stephen Eilert wrote:
I have seen patches in that bug report to add the firewall stubs. Is
there any problem with those patches?
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-July/077523.html
This explains it. Next commits should start on Monday 3rd.
Or, more to the point, is there any way
Hi,
We should not expect that the default Wine visual supports GLX, use
glXChooseVisual instead. This should fix bug 19570.
Regards,
Roderick Colenbrander
From 72f1dc239dc76f323288304aa902c97f343fca9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jul
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Ken Thomasesk...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Fixes building on Snow Leopard.
---
dlls/ntdll/directory.c | 30 ++
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
FWIW, NetBSD has a similar bug
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-June/074701.html
says that the offline installer for .net 3.0 works
fine with that one patch, but it didn't seem to work
when I tried it. Anyone know what the story is?
- Dan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dan Kegeld...@kegel.com wrote:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-June/074701.html
says that the offline installer for .net 3.0 works
fine with that one patch, but it didn't seem to work
when I tried it. Anyone know what the story is?
The
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Austin Englishaustinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dan Kegeld...@kegel.com wrote:
says that the offline installer for .net 3.0 works
fine with that one patch, but it didn't seem to work
when I tried it. Anyone know what the story
On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Austin English wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Ken Thomasesk...@codeweavers.com
wrote:
Fixes building on Snow Leopard.
---
dlls/ntdll/directory.c | 30 ++
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
FWIW, NetBSD has
16 matches
Mail list logo
