It turns out I was missing libxml2 in one of my environments and this
lead to the following compilation error:
$ gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-DCOM_NO_WINDOWS_H -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o
Francois Gouget wrote:
It turns out I was missing libxml2 in one of my environments and this
lead to the following compilation error:
$ gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-DCOM_NO_WINDOWS_H -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wwrite-strings
Ge van Geldorp ggeld...@vmware.com writes:
Now, it is possible to fix all those failures. However, doing so would
require us to duplicate the tables that Microsoft uses. This is basically
the same problem that we have with the collation tables. To work around
this, I simply skip the test on
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Tony Wasserka wrote:
I think it would be better to store this in surface.c since I can't
think of anything else that would need this.
D3DXCheckTextureRequirements in texture.c will make use of the format
table, since it also needs information
You are right, but it would be neat to have them all grouped like they
are in d3dx9tex.h.
Not sure about that, assuming we ever support all possible filters and
conversions in D3DXLoadSurfaceFromMemory, we probably don't want to have
the texture stuff starting suddenly at line 3k or
Il Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:23:40 -0700, James McKenzie ha scritto:
Riccardo Loti wrote:
Il Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:56:46 -0700, James Mckenzie ha scritto:
Fixed a small typing error in the italian translation of clock.exe in
the property menu label (Properietà - Proprietà). Compiled and
tested
Eric Pouech eric.pou...@orange.fr writes:
@@ -250,3 +250,25 @@ int CDECL __STRINGTOLD( MSVCRT__LDOUBLE *value, char
**endptr, const char *str,
#endif
return 0;
}
+
+/**
+ * strtol (MSVCRT.@)
+ */
+long int
Hi Alistair,
Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
Hi,
Changelog:
msxml3: Add IDispatchEx support to IXMLDOMElement
+static const tid_t domelem_iface_tids[] = {
+IXMLDOMNode_tid,
+IXMLDOMElement_tid,
IXMLDOMElement inherits from IXMLDOMNode, so there is not need to add
IXMLDOMNode
2009/8/31 Owen Rudge oru...@codeweavers.com:
+BOOL load_mapi_providers();
+void unload_mapi_providers();
That doesn't do what you think it does. Also, a return value isn't
very useful if you're just going to ignore it.
2009/8/31 Owen Rudge oru...@codeweavers.com:
+mapiFunctions.MAPIAddress = (void*) get_mapi_function(MAPIAddress);
That's redundant now. Since you load the pointers all at once, you
don't need get_mapi_function() to do the NULL check on the module. You
can just enclose the entire block in an
You can't simply use long here, you need to handle the difference in the
size of long between Win32 and Unix.
but that's what we currently do !
A+
--
Eric Pouech
Eric Pouech eric.pou...@orange.fr writes:
You can't simply use long here, you need to handle the difference in the
size of long between Win32 and Unix.
but that's what we currently do !
A+
Sure, but that needs to be fixed. Since you are reimplementing it you
should do it right.
--
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Eric Pouech eric.pou...@orange.fr writes:
@@ -250,3 +250,25 @@ int CDECL __STRINGTOLD( MSVCRT__LDOUBLE *value, char
**endptr, const char *str,
#endif
return 0;
}
+
Hello.
Subject says it all. I suppose the tests I added may fail on other
locales, but there is no other way to test my patch?
Should i send it without the tests?
Thanks in advance.
Jan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jan de Mooij jandemo...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at
Hi Jan,
Subject says it all.
Well, you haven't waited nearly long enough. Sending it in today and
expecting it to be committed the same day is a bit much.
--Juan
Jan de Mooij wrote:
Hello.
Subject says it all. I suppose the tests I added may fail on other
locales, but there is no other way to test my patch?
Should i send it without the tests?
Thanks in advance.
Jan
I can't speak much to the patch itself, but the patch file you attached
has an
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Juan Langjuan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, you haven't waited nearly long enough. Sending it in today and
expecting it to be committed the same day is a bit much.
I saw that AJ committed patches sent before and after my email, so I
assumed he goes through them
I saw that AJ committed patches sent before and after my email, so I
assumed he goes through them in order.
It also depends on whether your patch is obviously correct, and your
Julliard rank. Since you're new around here, it's likely your patch
will be subject to more scrutiny. Plus Andrew
Of course it would probably help if I remembered to attach the patch.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Vincent Povirkvinc...@codeweavers.com wrote:
This needs an updated prefix to work.
--
Vincent Povirk
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Eric Pouecheric.pou...@orange.fr wrote:
A+
---
programs/winedbg/be_alpha.c | 8
programs/winedbg/be_ppc.c | 8
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/programs/winedbg/be_alpha.c
Riccardo Loti wrote:
Il Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:23:40 -0700, James McKenzie ha scritto:
Riccardo Loti wrote:
Il Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:56:46 -0700, James Mckenzie ha scritto:
Fixed a small typing error in the italian translation of clock.exe in
the property menu label
Owen Rudge oru...@codeweavers.com wrote:
+HRESULT WINAPI IUnknown_UIActivateIO(IUnknown *lpUnknown, BOOL fActivate,
LPMSG lpMsg)
+HRESULT WINAPI SHCreatePropertyBagOnRegKey (HKEY hKey, LPCWSTR pszSubKey,
+DWORD grfMode, REFIID riid, void **ppv)
+HRESULT WINAPI
22 matches
Mail list logo
