2010/4/6 Rico Schüller kgbric...@web.de:
+struct d3d10_effect_shader_signature {
That isn't going to apply. Did you edit the patch? (And please keep
the formatting consistent with the existing code.)
On 7 April 2010 11:29, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
That isn't going to apply.
Also, 3/4 and 4/4 have similar issues.
On 6 April 2010 23:14, Johan Gill johan.g...@gmail.com wrote:
+»··»···if (!EqualRect(scrn, orig_rect)) {
+»··»···/* Check that the client rect was resized */
+»··»···rc = GetClientRect(hwnd, test);
+»··»···ok(rc!=0, GetClientRect returned %x\n, rc);
Hi,
I have a suggestion about wineTestBot.
It's maybe the wrong place but I'm quite sure interested people read
wine-devel.
I think it would be great if we could
not only run tests (as it already does)
but also check if a patch does not break wine (on minGW, on cygwin or on MAC
for instance).
Alexandre Goujon ale.gou...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, I can't compile on Linux and cygwin is very slow.
So it would make my life easier if I could rely on wineTestBot...
For any productive Wine development you need not only working compiling
environment, but a working Wine binary, to run at
Eric Pouech eric.pou...@orange.fr writes:
@@ -549,12 +549,21 @@ void get_thread_context( struct thread *thread,
context_t *context, unsigned int
goto done;
}
}
+#ifdef __i386__
context-debug.i386_regs.dr0 = data[0];
context-debug.i386_regs.dr1 =
Hello,
I'm a student interested in participating in Google's Summer of Code.
This isn't my first mail to the wine-devel list; I was a GSoC
partiicpant in 2007, where I worked on WIne's WordPad clone. I have also
done some work on the AppDB as well as minor bug fixes and lately a
(little)
Hi Alexander,
Good to see you back in GSoc. I can't comment on IE / control panel as
I don't know much about it but I will comment to another small part.
As for my own project ideas, I think it would have been interesting to
implement IPX over TCP in winsock, since most of the games that use
Hi,
I forgot to mention that this patch was rebased against 1.1.42,
supersedes the former Fix A/W mapping for 64bit Wine patch and
is not dependent on prior 64bit patches.
Currently, I can't think of a fully general solution to the A/W
mapping problem. In theory, an unknown driver with new
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote
For any productive Wine development you need not only working compiling
environment, but a working Wine binary, to run at least 'make test'.
Ok so I could not run any test until compiling on cygwin works.
But the idea was to be able to remotly compile wine with some of
Alexandre Goujon ale.gou...@gmail.com wrote:
For any productive Wine development you need not only working compiling
environment, but a working Wine binary, to run at least 'make test'.
Ok so I could not run any test until compiling on cygwin works.
Even if compiling under Cygwin works,
Patchwatcher is suppose to sort of do this. It only works for linux, not
other systems, but it will not only check your patch against compiling but
also against the test suit and mark and regressions.
I didn't know this tool.
It looks quite interesting.
Thanks again for your advices
Hi Alexandre,
Ok so I could not run any test until compiling on cygwin works.
But the idea was to be able to remotly compile wine with some of our patches
applied.
I was told you can't do that, it will break minGW.
The WINEBUILD VM exists but we can't use it (or tell me how to do that)
The
Am 07.04.2010 11:29, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
2010/4/6 Rico Schüllerkgbric...@web.de:
+struct d3d10_effect_shader_signature {
That isn't going to apply. Did you edit the patch? (And please keep
the formatting consistent with the existing code.)
Sorry, Thunderbird screwed up
There is a long list of technologies in Mac OS X that could be used to improve
Wine on OS X. One of them is ColorSync. ColorSync is a color management
software that is HEAVILY integrated into the Mac OS. For instance, you can
calibrate your monitor and when OS X starts up, it will read the
2010/4/7 Rico Schüller kgbric...@web.de:
+/* Check desc for NULL, this crashes on W7/DX10 */
+if (!desc)
+{
+WARN(This should crash on W7/DX10!\n);
+return E_FAIL;
+}
It's perfectly fine to require a parameter to be non-NULL, and just
crash if it isn't. You'll
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy mike.kaplins...@gmail.com writes:
Would allowing adding the fd to the poll loop after it has been
removed be more sane? Otherwise we have to resort to ugly things like
sock_try_event (which only half
In general, the idea looks right, that's how it probably should be
implemented. This is an implementation detail through. The bigger and
more important problem is URI parsing and canonicalization. That's where
most of work needs to be done. In this case tests will be also very
important.
Eric Pouech eric.pou...@orange.fr wrote:
+case CPU_x86_64:
+context-debug.x86_64_regs.dr0 = data[0];
+context-debug.x86_64_regs.dr1 = data[1];
+context-debug.x86_64_regs.dr2 = data[2];
+context-debug.x86_64_regs.dr3 = data[3];
+
20 matches
Mail list logo
