Is it worth a few extra page impressions to dispose of the meaningful
version progress of Wine?
I would say no.
Wine will be popular regardless of its version string as long as it
continues to support a large set of applications. I'm of the stronger
opinion that we should be releasing our own pr
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Austin English
> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
Well yes, an automated performance testing system has been on the
wined3d todo list for some time now. I even have a p
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Austin English wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
>>> Well yes, an automated performance testing system has been on the
>>> wined3d todo list for some time now. I even have a pretty good idea of
>>> how I'd want it to look and work. It
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> Well yes, an automated performance testing system has been on the
>> wined3d todo list for some time now. I even have a pretty good idea of
>> how I'd want it to look and work. It's just
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:27:16 +0200
Remco wrote:
> How about, instead of calling the next major release version 1.2, call
> it version 2.0? The reason is purely marketing: an x.0 number will
> attract more press. Last major release was 1.0. It seems fitting to
> have the next major release be 2.0.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> Well yes, an automated performance testing system has been on the
> wined3d todo list for some time now. I even have a pretty good idea of
> how I'd want it to look and work. It's just never going to happen
> because there's always something
On 18 April 2010 01:03, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I'm trying to find short, small benchmarks that approximate
> demanding scenes from popular games. Maybe we can
> use them for performance regression testing and/or comparing
> our performance to windows. wisotool is just a convenient way
> to install g
http://IvanaKalmus0627.co.cc
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 17 April 2010 19:37, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> I've added four benchmarks to wisotool:
> What exactly is the use-case for this?
I'm trying to find short, small benchmarks that approximate
demanding scenes from popular games. Maybe we can
use
On 17 April 2010 19:37, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I've added four benchmarks to wisotool:
What exactly is the use-case for this?
You may be able to add the timedemo mode of a few games.
Thanks,
Scott Ritchie
On 04/17/2010 10:37 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I've added four benchmarks to wisotool:
3dmark03 3D Mark 03 (Futuremark, 2003)
3dmark06 3D Mark 06 (Futuremark, 2006)
re5bench Resident Evil 5 Benchmark (
On 17/04/10 17:36, Greg Geldorp wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Yes that happens for me now too but not immediately in t
Hi James,
2010/4/17 James McKenzie :
> Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I decided to dig through the sample documentation for rtkit and see if I
>> could find a way to make it work for wine.
>> There's still a few things missing: hardcoded libdbus soname, no checking
>> if dbus is avai
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Hi all,
I decided to dig through the sample documentation for rtkit and see if
I could find a way to make it work for wine.
There's still a few things missing: hardcoded libdbus soname, no
checking if dbus is available, -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0
-I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/incl
I would be fine with calling this wine 2.0, since it adds
a major new feature (64 bit compatibility).
How about, instead of calling the next major release version 1.2, call
it version 2.0? The reason is purely marketing: an x.0 number will
attract more press. Last major release was 1.0. It seems fitting to
have the next major release be 2.0. Besides, is there any reason to
have multiple levels of "
I've added four benchmarks to wisotool:
3dmark03 3D Mark 03 (Futuremark, 2003)
3dmark06 3D Mark 06 (Futuremark, 2006)
re5bench Resident Evil 5 Benchmark (Capcom, 2009)
unigine_heaven Unigen Heaven 2 Benchmark (Unigen, 2010)
Are there others worth using (besides, I suppose, 3dmar
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Eric Pouech wrote:
[...]
> > winedbg: Fix compilation with gcc 2.95 and non-GNU compilers.
> >
> François,
> what was the exact issue here ? I guess that the ; at the end of the attribute
> definition for GNUCC compiler was missing for the non gnu C compilers ?
There were t
On 4/17/2010 15:14, Davide Pizzetti wrote:
Here's an italian translation update of winecfg
-LTEXT "Le Dynamic Link Libraries possono essere specificate indiv
+LTEXT "Le Dynamic Link Libraries possono essere specificate indiv
,IDC_STATIC,16,
Morten Rønne wrote:
> I would like to write some tests for the krnl386.exe16 part of wine, or
> more precisely the DOS parts of that.
Archives should have enough asnwers to question like this one, one of
the attemps is here:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-January/072560.html
Hi
I would like to write some tests for the krnl386.exe16 part of wine, or
more precisely the DOS parts of that.
But there is no starting point at the moment.
As far as I can understand other tests are run as 32/64 bit programs,
which makes sense since they test the 32/64 parts of wine.
Bu
--- On Fri, 16/4/10, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:51:29PM
> +0200, André Hentschel wrote:
> > ---
> > tools/winegcc/winegcc.c |8
>
> > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0
> deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/winegcc/winegcc.c
> b/tools/winegcc/winegcc.c
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1506
Your paranoid android.
23 matches
Mail list logo
