Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2019
Your paranoid
On 05/09/2010 05:00 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Edward Savage epss...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
wrote:
Unless some major problems come up, 1.1.44 will be the last of the 1.1.x
series. The next release will be 1.2-rc1, which
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote:
It seems to me what we really want is more than a changelog but a proper
release announcement. I want a journalist who has hardly heard of Wine
to read the page and understand what we've done and why it's great.
I've
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Edward Savage epss...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org
wrote:
It seems to me what we really want is more than a changelog but a proper
release announcement. I want a journalist who has hardly heard of
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Brian Vincent brian.vinc...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, what would be really good would be to provide some contact information
for people that can be used by the press to ask some simple questions about
the release. It'd be good to have a European contact and a US
Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org writes:
On 05/09/2010 05:00 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
We definitely need a release changelog, yes.
It seems to me what we really want is more than a changelog but a proper
release announcement. I want a journalist who has hardly heard of Wine
to read
On 05/09/2010 05:00 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Edward Savage epss...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
wrote:
Unless some major problems come up, 1.1.44 will be the last of the 1.1.x
series. The next release will be 1.2-rc1, which
Am 12.05.2010 19:00, schrieb wine-devel-requ...@winehq.org:
Send wine-devel mailing list submissions to
wine-devel@winehq.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or
On May 12, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
In Mac OS X 10.5, mmap() was changed to conform to UNIX '03. Among other
things, this means that mmap() no longer supports unaligned file offsets
(like Linux).
What problems does this cause?
However, by reading Darwin source, I learned that
On 5/12/10 5:37 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
What problems does this cause?
It makes Wine use more memory than it needs to.
http://wiki.winehq.org/UnalignedMmap
Can't we achieve that just by avoiding the mapping of the mmap identifier
to the _mmap$UNIX2003 symbol?
We could for 32-bit, but not
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2036
Your paranoid
On May 12, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
On 5/12/10 5:37 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
What problems does this cause?
It makes Wine use more memory than it needs to.
http://wiki.winehq.org/UnalignedMmap
Can't we achieve that just by avoiding the mapping of the mmap identifier
to the
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesin...@gmx.at wrote:
Steam is pretty nice in this regard. Everything you need can be controlled
via Command line, e.g.
Steam.exe -login user pass -applaunch 220 -novid -console -window -w 1024
-h 768 -dxlevel 90 +timedemo mytimedemo
On 5/12/10 6:10 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
On May 12, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
On 5/12/10 5:37 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
What problems does this cause?
It makes Wine use more memory than it needs to.
http://wiki.winehq.org/UnalignedMmap
Can't we achieve that just by avoiding the
14 matches
Mail list logo
