Hi Marcus,
2010/6/13 Marcus Meissner :
> Hi,
>
> The size is 248 on Wine64 ... (expected 240), so we miss
> perhaps a pointer or some alignment.
>
> Its not fully clear what.
>
> It at least does not crash when ignoring the size change.
Seems wrong to me, does it allow size 240 on 64-bits, or does
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2620
Your paranoid android.
On 13 June 2010 20:46, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 6/13/2010 22:55, (Marvin) wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
>> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might
>> be
>> wrong, but could you please double-chec
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> ... it would
> be nice to have valgrind tests logs as you did some months ago.
> I think it's possible to catch something new that is easy to fix for 1.2.
You're right. I'll try to find them time to fire that up again.
On 6/13/2010 22:55, (Marvin) wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDeta
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2617
Your paranoid android.
Austin English wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 1:02 PM, James McKenzie
wrote:
This is patch 1/4 to implement EM_FORMATRANGE. This patch does not change
any of the code but moves code from ME_WrapMarkedParagraphs to
ME_WrapTextParagraph.
The bug report #6254, which this is a solution to is m
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 1:02 PM, James McKenzie
wrote:
> This is patch 1/4 to implement EM_FORMATRANGE. This patch does not change
> any of the code but moves code from ME_WrapMarkedParagraphs to
> ME_WrapTextParagraph.
>
> The bug report #6254, which this is a solution to is marked as needed for
André Hentschel writes:
> i had that case with
> err:msi:ACTION_CallDllFunction GetProcAddress for function
> L"findApplications" in dll L"C:\\users\\dawncrow\\Temp\\msi94eb.tmp" failed
> so you see that just the function is not info enough.
I don't see that. The name of the temp file is not me
On 6/13/2010 18:53, Dan Kegel wrote:
How close are we to release?
Not closely related to a beta testing, but for quality it is - it would
be nice to have valgrind tests logs as you did some months ago.
I think it's possible to catch something new that is easy to fix for 1.2.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:00 AM, James McKenzie
wrote:
>> How close are we to release? Maybe it'd be worth
>> it to publicise the upcoming wine release by
>> flogging rc3 in various news sites and getting more people to
>> look for regressions.
>
> +1.
OK, I've posted something to linuxtoday an
http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine1.2Announcement could use some work
if anyone has time...
Edward Savage wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
How close are we to release? Maybe it'd be worth
it to publicise the upcoming wine release by
flogging rc3 in various news sites and getting more people to
look for regressions.
If it's still a couple of weeks o
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
On 06/13/2010 10:39 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers...
340 regressions<-- release announcement
356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week
339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1)
322 regressions<--
Jan Hoogenraad wrote:
Attached a simple script which at least removes those files that were
installed by another application (possibly winetricks) and are now
provided by wine.
On my computer, it removed the following files (of which I am unsure
of its origins).
17680 1998-08-06 12:43 psapi
Dan Kegel wrote:
How close are we to release? Maybe it'd be worth
it to publicise the upcoming wine release by
flogging rc3 in various news sites and getting more people to
look for regressions.
+1. I'm getting a fresh git and fixing/running and then submitting the
EM_FORMATRANGE patches to
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> How close are we to release? Maybe it'd be worth
> it to publicise the upcoming wine release by
> flogging rc3 in various news sites and getting more people to
> look for regressions.
>
If it's still a couple of weeks off I could write up a re
How close are we to release? Maybe it'd be worth
it to publicise the upcoming wine release by
flogging rc3 in various news sites and getting more people to
look for regressions.
The thread about Wylda's statistics reminded me about
http://wiki.winehq.org/PlatinumRegressionHunt
We mentioned that i
What problem are you trying to solve?
I gather you're just plowing through the output of 'make test',
looking at each bit of noise, and trying to figure out a way
to improve the tests?
While that's a noble quest, and I'd like to
encourage people to improve the tests,
it might be more productive to
I'm trying to get a start on helping with wine development. I'm still in
the process of reading the developer's guide, and I think I am making
progress on that. As a test of my understanding, I started to annotate
the output of 'make -k test'. I'd like your opinion on the usefulness of
this. A
Attached a simple script which at least removes those files that were
installed by another application (possibly winetricks) and are now
provided by wine.
On my computer, it removed the following files (of which I am unsure of
its origins).
17680 1998-08-06 12:43 psapi.dll
131072 1999-01-15
On 06/13/2010 10:39 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers...
340 regressions<-- release announcement
356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week
339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1)
322 regressions<-- release announcement + 3w
Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers...
340 regressions <-- release announcement
356 regressions <-- release announcement + 1week
339 regressions <-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1)
322 regressions <-- release announcement + 3weeks(rc2)
325 regressions <-- release announ
23 matches
Mail list logo
