James wrote:
This whole line of thought was rejected, at least once.
Yes, but see his later patchset. I think he's
now just trying to provide a uniform abstraction for the existing
ad-hoc single-shot FIXMEs without adding any new ones,
following Henri's advice in
On 7/18/2010 10:17, Austin English wrote:
Passed all the vm's on wtb.
Hi, Austin. This looks strange:
+
+hFile = CreateFileA(c:\\*.*,
GENERIC_READ,FILE_SHARE_READ,NULL,OPEN_EXISTING,FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,NULL );
+ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_NAME || broken(GetLastError() ==
On Sunday 18 July 2010 00:26:36 Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 17 July 2010 09:06, Andrey Turkin andrey.tur...@gmail.com wrote:
+if (nt-OptionalHeader.FileAlignment = 0)
I can't comment much on the changes themselves, but FileAlignment is
unsigned, so can't be 0.
Original function has this
On Sunday 18 July 2010 00:26:50 Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 17 July 2010 09:07, Andrey Turkin andrey.tur...@gmail.com wrote:
+#ifdef NONAMELESSUNION
+# define U(x) (x).u
+#else
+# define U(x) (x)
+#endif
I think this is already done in wine/test.h?
Right. Some other tests define
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3449
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3456
Your paranoid
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3459
Your paranoid
On 7/18/2010 15:59, Mariusz Pluciński wrote:
+/* interface available up from Vista */
+hr = CoCreateInstance(CLSID_GameExplorer, NULL,
CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER,IID_IGameExplorer, (LPVOID*)ge);
+ok(ge hr == S_OK, IGameExplorer creating failed (result false)\n);
+if(ge)
+{
+
On 07/17/2010 10:27 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Hi Max
Welcome to Wine.
Your Patch [Add '_ONCE' variants of DPRINTF, FIXME, WARN.]
( http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/63503 )
has a typo near the end:
#define ERR_ONCE WINE_ERR_ONCEE
Thank you! Fixed and resubmitted.
Austin English wrote:
Passed all the vm's on wtb.
+hFile = CreateFileA(c:\\*.*,
GENERIC_READ,FILE_SHARE_READ,NULL,OPEN_EXISTING,FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,NULL );
+ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_NAME ||
On 07/18/2010 04:17 PM, Tom Wickline wrote:
You forgot to attach the patches :) and a subjust is nice as well.
Tom
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Alexandre Goujon
ale.gou...@gmail.com mailto:ale.gou...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is another big path; should fix bug #18071.
These tests
the explanations for the bug fix look really strange
all the printf use %4.4s form, which will limit output to only 4 chars,
whatever the string is terminated or not
so the crash doesn't come from here
looking quickly at the patch, several remark arise
- in the second third modification to the
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:43 PM, GOUJON Alexandre ale.gou...@gmail.com wrote:
What I want is to add a comment to some patch before the
...
for instance.
Any idea how to do that ?
Just do `git format-patch' with proper parameters and this will result
in a series of files, one for each patch
Dan Kegel wrote:
James wrote:
This whole line of thought was rejected, at least once.
Yes, but see his later patchset. I think he's
now just trying to provide a uniform abstraction for the existing
ad-hoc single-shot FIXMEs without adding any new ones,
following Henri's advice in
Dear All:
I just wanted to double check before I do anything with
D3DXCreateTeapot.
I have several options for implementing this:
Option A
One, the slightly harder option, involves the original dataset:
http://www.sjbaker.org/teapot/teaset.tgz
Option B
Another, much simpler
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All:
I just wanted to double check before I do anything with
D3DXCreateTeapot.
I have several options for implementing this:
Option A
One, the slightly harder option, involves the original dataset:
On 18 July 2010 21:56, Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmail.com wrote:
Others have mentioned before that the only 'reverse' engineering
method we allow is black box reverse engineering. Technically this is
black box, but I would say that you can't use the output because of
copyright
IMHO, our criterion is we only need to implement what apps really need,
and for the moment, that app probably could live with a stub for
D3DXCreateTeapot. When we run into a complaint about
our lousy teapot, we can create a better one. So relax,
just do a stub, and move on to more important
On 18 July 2010 22:37, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
IMHO, our criterion is we only need to implement what apps really need,
and for the moment, that app probably could live with a stub for
D3DXCreateTeapot. When we run into a complaint about
our lousy teapot, we can create a better one.
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 14:37 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
IMHO, our criterion is we only need to implement what apps really need,
and for the moment, that app probably could live with a stub for
D3DXCreateTeapot. When we run into a complaint about
our lousy teapot, we can create a better one. So
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 14:37 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
IMHO, our criterion is we only need to implement what apps really need,
and for the moment, that app probably could live with a stub for
D3DXCreateTeapot. When we
I believe the GLMap2f functions are actually creating further vertex data...
I could be wrong though. Thx
Misha
On Jul 18, 2010 5:46 PM, Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at...
How
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the GLMap2f functions are actually creating further vertex data...
I could be wrong though. Thx
Misha
I don't know if this is entirely necessary for your purpose, but
OpenGL has a feedback buffer which can be
Thank you. I will take a look at this tomorrow morning.
On Jul 18, 2010 8:05 PM, Jeff Zaroyko jeffzaro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the GLMap2f...
I don't know if this is entirely necessary for your purpose, but
OpenGL
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:39 AM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
Austin English wrote:
Passed all the vm's on wtb.
+ hFile = CreateFileA(c:\\*.*,
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Nikolay Sivov nsi...@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 7/18/2010 10:17, Austin English wrote:
Passed all the vm's on wtb.
Hi, Austin. This looks strange:
+
+ hFile = CreateFileA(c:\\*.*,
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
+SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
+hFile = CreateFileA(c:\\*.*, GENERIC_READ, FILE_SHARE_READ, NULL,
OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL);
+ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_NAME ||
+broken(GetLastError() ==
28 matches
Mail list logo
