Re: comctl32: Simplify is_textT by omitting isW.

2010-08-15 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >> -static inline BOOL is_textT(LPCWSTR text, BOOL isW) >> +static inline BOOL is_textT(LPCWSTR text) >> > There's no reason to keep this helper then. It's better to rename > is_textW() to is_text() and remove is_textT(). Excellent idea. I'll submit a p

Re: Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

2010-08-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
you'll have to reassign my patches to the "(None)" category. While I do Will do, of course. Also for all the other requests I get/got. for that; even my trips to the WineConfs are payed out of my own pocket. Sounds familiar ;) Regards, Wolfram

Re: Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

2010-08-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
But just for accuracy, I'm a frenchman. Ah, now I remember what I wanted to add to the README :) I did not change anything in the built-in country-detection which is still quite experimental, even upstream. Please just ignore it. I once thought about removing it, might do so later on. Than

Re: Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

2010-08-15 Thread GOUJON Alexandre
Rather interesting , thanks ! But just for accuracy, I'm a frenchman.

Re: Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

2010-08-15 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 15 August 2010 19:28, Marcus Meissner wrote: > Similar for me ... "mar...@jet.franken.de" is my private account and means > private work. > Similar split for me, although the amount of patches from hverb...@gmail.com after 1.0 is probably trivial.

Re: Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

2010-08-15 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:13:12PM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > Hello Wolfram, > > On 08/15/2010 05:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon >> (near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested >> in some numbers

Re: Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

2010-08-15 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Hello Wolfram, On 08/15/2010 05:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon (near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics) for wine. The outcome f

Re: [PATCH 1/5] d3d10: Fix d3dcommon.h inclusion.

2010-08-15 Thread James McKenzie
Rico Schüller wrote: Hi, this patch series implements the ID3DBlob interface. This time the interface is implemented in the d3dcompiler_43.dll. The function D3D10CreateBlob from d3d10 is forwarded to the D3DCreateBlob function in the d3dcompiler_43.dll. Does this replace the ten patch series

Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

2010-08-15 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hello, I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon (near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics) for wine. The outcome for the 1.0->1.2 cycle can be found here, if someb

Re: Wine users with a CD-ROM drive, please test

2010-08-15 Thread James McKenzie
Matijn Woudt wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, wrote: Hi, I found out that some machines ignore set c audio all off which was in the testsuite, while others react to it and even update the system preferences volume mixer control if it happens to be open. I don't know whether that di

Re: [7/13] comctl32/imagelist: Fail to create imagelist with zero or negative image dimensions

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4453 Your paranoid android.

Re: [4/13] comctl32/imagelist: Fix failure code for IImageList_Remove()

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4450 Your paranoid android.

Re: [6/13] comctl32/imagelist: Fail in ImageList_GetIconSize on null parameters

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4452 Your paranoid android.

Re: [5/13] comctl32/tests: More imagelist tests to show broken parameter validation

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4451 Your paranoid android.

Re: [1/13] comctl32/tests: Use better names for test functions, discover some new test failures

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4447 Your paranoid android.

Re: [3/13] comctl32/imagelist: Fix failure code for IImageList_Draw()

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4449 Your paranoid android.

Re: [2/13] comctl32/tests: Use reduced IMAGELISTDRAWPARAMS structure size for tests

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4448 Your paranoid android.

Re: Wine users with a CD-ROM drive, please test

2010-08-15 Thread Matijn Woudt
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I found out that some machines ignore > set c audio all off > which was in the testsuite, while others react to it and even > update the system preferences volume mixer control if > it happens to be open. > > I don't know whether that difference d

Re: avifil32: Fix EditStreamSetInfo wine checks

2010-08-15 Thread testbot
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4442 Your paranoid android.

iPod synced with iTunes v7.6!

2010-08-15 Thread Russ Mannex
Hello Maarten! I read your post on the WineHQ site. I was wondering if you know whether I am attempting something that simply will not work yet. I am running iTunes 7.7.1 on Wine 1.1.42. These are running on Ubuntu 10.04. iTunes is not showing my iPod. I have tried setting an autodetect drive E: t