Have you checked that it doesn't just return a
SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION ? It seems to be the right
format for the name anyway. I'd play with the size argument or try
using NtQuerySystemInformationEx (some new thing in win7). You could
just find a case that passes and implement it
Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
dlls/urlmon/binding.c | 17 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This breaks the gameux tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gameux.dll -T ../../.. -p
gameux_test.exe.so gameexplorer.c touch
On 10/5/2010 14:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jacek Cabanja...@codeweavers.com writes:
---
dlls/urlmon/binding.c | 17 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This breaks the gameux tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gameux.dll -T ../../.. -p
2010/10/5 Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2...@yahoo.co.uk:
It would be better to avoid duplicate GetWindowTextW() calls.
I thought a long time how to fix this, but i couldn't find another way than
this one, because we need to find out whether or not the window title is
empty, and afaik we can only
I do not believe this is correct.
You would be destroying the context every time it is released and that
is clearly not what we want to be doing ass ImmGetContext and
ImmReleaseContext as a pair are called over and over again in a typical
application.
-aric
On 10/4/10 1:25 PM, Mikhail
Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu writes:
+imgs[nFrames++] = image;
+if (!(imgstmp = HeapReAlloc( GetProcessHeap(), 0, imgs,
nFrames*sizeof(XcursorImage*) ))) goto cleanup;
+imgs = imgstmp;
This is still broken.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
It would be better to avoid duplicate GetWindowTextW() calls.
I thought a long time how to fix this, but i couldn't find another way than
this one, because we need to find out whether or not the window title is
empty, and afaik we can only do
On 10/05/2010 04:46 AM, Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
---
dlls/kernel32/process.c | 21 ++---
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Please exchange patches 2 and 3.
And everywhere in your patches, please stick to _THE SAME_ formatting as the
rest of the file you
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5824
Your paranoid
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 16:59 +0200, test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
Hi,
a few month ago when the discussion about PreferredOnly registry
setting came up, I queried Google and found that many more users
use this setting than one may believe - i.e. it is not exotic. Therefore,
I don't think it's that great an idea to reduce the number of devices that
the tests
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5828
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5829
Your paranoid
Hi Yaron,
I'm see this one is still not applied. Maybe because there are still
some small issues? See below.
On 10/03/2010 11:12 PM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
+LANGUAGE LANG_HEBREW, SUBLANG_DEFAULT
This line should go, it's redundant (it's already stated at the
beginning). This line was
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5867
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5870
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5869
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5868
Your paranoid
18 matches
Mail list logo
