The small patches I've submitted previously have been very minor code
changes that I put together in a text editor. But today I've been
perusing the available bug list, and see a couple of more ambitious
things I would like to try to tackle.
My question is: Which IDE/editors do you real devs
+static SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION cached_lpi[1024];
You think there are systems with that many CPUs running Wine?
I honestly don't know the array is currently large enough to support
146 CPU's with 4 unique Caches (L1i,L1d,L2,L3), each in it's own
processorpackage and numa node. This
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Marko Nikolic grk...@gmail.com writes:
In case of test failure, expected and received values are traced.
Format for the two values was different, corrected so both values
are traced as hex.
Error values are in general more useful in decimal.
You are right, I
KDevelop is a great IDE to work on C/++ code in general; if you get
crashes, you can try to compile it yourself, most of the time it's
outdated packages. For small things I generally use Kate personally,
but I know most wine devs are emacs or vim addicts.
J. Leclanche
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at
On 10/09/2010 11:50 PM, Evil Jay wrote:
My question is: Which IDE/editors do you real devs prefer for your
work on Wine?
It depends on you.
I mean, some devs like auto-completion and will use an IDE (Eclipse,
Code::Blocks, Dec-C++, NetBeans ... GIYF !) whereas others will prefer
good text
On Sunday 10 October 2010 00:26:45 you wrote:
On 10/09/2010 12:37 PM, Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
+static SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION cached_lpi[1024];
You think there are systems with that many CPUs running Wine?
I honestly don't know the array is currently large enough to
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6009
Your paranoid
On 10/10/2010 03:42 AM, Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
I haven't found out how to do this properly yet and i think that i definitely
need help on that one (like an example) as my skills in C are not that good
and all i manage to get when trying to allocate the stuff from the heap is a
segfault.
Am 10.10.2010 13:01, schrieb GOUJON Alexandre:
On 10/09/2010 11:50 PM, Evil Jay wrote:
My question is: Which IDE/editors do you real devs prefer for your
work on Wine?
It depends on you.
True!
I didn't want a heavy IDE nor a complicated console app. So i did all my Wine
work (small and big
Hi lats,
you should please provide your real name in your mail, otherwise your patch has
bad chances to get in.
Normally you can configure git, so that it reports your name in the From:
field.
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6017
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6022
Your paranoid
On Sunday 10 October 2010 18:43:25 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 10/10/2010 03:42 AM, Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
I haven't found out how to do this properly yet and i think that i
definitely need help on that one (like an example) as my skills in C are
not that good and all i manage to get when
While searching for something else I discovered a bug relevant to the
interface-bound UDP broadcast patches I've been working on.
Apparently, IP_PKTINFO does work on Windows when used with the
WSARecvMsg function (Bug #19493). I've attached a patch to address
this issue (including tests), and I
14 matches
Mail list logo
