On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Anyone going to be at Scale in Los Angeles this weekend?
> I'll be giving a talk there tomorrow afternoon, showing
> off how well Wine works and demonstrating how to
> use and extend winetricks. Draft slides are up
> at http://kegel.com/wine/sca
Anyone going to be at Scale in Los Angeles this weekend?
I'll be giving a talk there tomorrow afternoon, showing
off how well Wine works and demonstrating how to
use and extend winetricks. Draft slides are up
at http://kegel.com/wine/scale9x/
I still have time to tweak them, so if you have sugges
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9519
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9515
Your paranoid android.
Hi Tim,
> Before going to the effort of completing the library, and porting it back to
> the Wine tree, I thought I'd reach out first to see if it's even something
> that's of interest? If it is, great, we can complete the library and submit
> some patches for review, but if the concept isn't of
On 25 February 2011 17:56, Tim Burrell wrote:
> Anyone have thoughts / questions?
>
I'm not sure how relevant the problem this solves is to Wine, it's
strikes me as something that's mainly interesting for people
distributing non-distro binaries.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9486
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
Now you entirely remove the ini-stuff, why?
and why do you use a OR (||) for the registry function?
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Saulius Krasuckas writes:
> Thanks. Do you mean something like integrating OpenWatcom C compiler
> optionally into dlls/*/tests?
>
> And then running 16-bit part of winetest on Win3.1? WinXP seems to be
> broken in my case. While Win98 seems OK.
No, winetest would run on XP. If your app doe
* On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Saulius Krasuckas writes:
>
> > I have at least one Win16 app which behaves differently on Win16, on
> > XP and on Wine [*].
> > What's the right way to get it running OK on Wine then (without
> > appropriate Win16API tests) ?
>
> Fix the bug
Hi all,
I'm one of TransGaming's R&D developers working on our portability products.
We've recently done a cleanup and refactoring to the OpenSSL loading
routines; rather than loading the libraries in a few different places we
moved the code into an OpenSSL importer that consolidates the loadi
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> The original post asked for help leading up to the release of 1.2. That's
> obviously outdated, and the thread now just attracts spammers. Should it be
> updated, or simply removed?
IMHO removing the sticky should be fine. In the midst of a development
cycle there is no p
The original post asked for help leading up to the release of 1.2. That's
obviously outdated, and the thread now just attracts spammers. Should it be
updated, or simply removed?
--
Rosanne DiMesio
On 26/02/11 00:05, Marcus Meissner wrote:
diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/dib.c b/dlls/gdi32/dib.c
index 0619304..595eb9b 100644
--- a/dlls/gdi32/dib.c
+++ b/dlls/gdi32/dib.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ INT WINAPI GetDIBits(
*/
if (bmp->dib->dsBmih.biHeight< 0)
{
-
В сообщении от 23 февраля 2011 21:43:49 автор Alexandre Julliard написал:
> Vitaly Perov writes:
> > @@ -7247,7 +7247,7 @@ static BOOL get_job_info_2(job_t *job, JOB_INFO_2W
> > *ji2, LPBYTE buf, DWORD cbBuf
> >
> > else
> > {
> >
> > /* align DEVMODE to a
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:41:31PM +1100, Peter Urbanec wrote:
> ---
> dlls/gdi32/dib.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/dib.c b/dlls/gdi32/dib.c
> index 0619304..595eb9b 100644
> --- a/dlls/gdi32/dib.c
> +++ b/dlls/gdi32/dib.c
> @@ -88
> > +if (!hKey) RegCloseKey(hKey);
>
> This one is still not fixed.
Thank you very much for your patience!
I am sorry for such trivial mistakes. I didn't have enough sleep last time.
--
Best regards,
Vitaly Perov
Vitaly Perov wrote:
> +if (!hKey) RegCloseKey(hKey);
This one is still not fixed.
--
Dmitry.
Alexander Kochetkov wrote:
> This is for the test application attached to the bug #22996
> I'm not sure, should I remove FT_IS_SCALABLE? How can I test the patch with
> non
> scalable font? Could you please give me some advice?
Testing with a non-scalable font should be easy, just use System i
19 matches
Mail list logo
