On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:57:40PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
On 5/19/11 1:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
It is trivial. You basically build wine twice, once in the 32bit
environment and once inthe 64bit one.
Maybe Wine can look into some sort of merge process to build both
and at runtime
On Sunday 22 May 2011 06:57:30 Dylan Smith wrote:
4 bytes of padding are at the end of DDSURFACEDESC when compiling for
x64, because it contains a pointer field followed by an odd number
of DWORD fields.
Does DDSURFACEDESC have the same padding when using the microsoft headers and
msvc?
André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote:
+if (!pfwi-hwnd || pfwi-cbSize sizeof(FLASHWINFO))
+{
+SetLastError(ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER);
+return FALSE;
+}
I don't see in your tests the case for 'cbSize sizeof(FLASHWINFO)'.
Also using !IsWindow() instead of !hwnd
Den 21. mai 2011 19:38, skrev Scott Ritchie:
Well now we can just Depends: wine:i386 or similar, I think.
Last time I asked, they said the first multiarch implementation will not
support that. The implementation cost of that would be very high (among
other things, it might violate the current
On 5/21/11 11:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:57:40PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
On 5/19/11 1:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
It is trivial. You basically build wine twice, once in the 32bit
environment and once inthe 64bit one.
Maybe Wine can look into some sort of
Am 22.05.2011 09:58, schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote:
+if (!pfwi-hwnd || pfwi-cbSize sizeof(FLASHWINFO))
+{
+SetLastError(ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER);
+return FALSE;
+}
I don't see in your tests the case for 'cbSize
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 06:26:45AM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
On 5/21/11 11:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:57:40PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
On 5/19/11 1:51 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
It is trivial. You basically build wine twice, once in the 32bit
environment
On 05/22/2011 03:53 AM, Ove Kåven wrote:
Den 21. mai 2011 19:38, skrev Scott Ritchie:
Well now we can just Depends: wine:i386 or similar, I think.
Last time I asked, they said the first multiarch implementation will not
support that. The implementation cost of that would be very high (among
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesin...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sunday 22 May 2011 06:57:30 Dylan Smith wrote:
4 bytes of padding are at the end of DDSURFACEDESC when compiling for
x64, because it contains a pointer field followed by an odd number
of DWORD fields.
Does
On So, 2011-05-22, André Hentschel wrote
Thanks, will get into try 2
pfwi-cbSize sizeof(FLASHWINFO) || pfwi-cbSize sizeof(FLASHWINFO)
That code can be reduced to:
pfwi-cbSize != sizeof(FLASHWINFO)
--
By by ... Detlef
Den 22. mai 2011 21:48, skrev Scott Ritchie:
On 05/22/2011 03:53 AM, Ove Kåven wrote:
Den 21. mai 2011 19:38, skrev Scott Ritchie:
Well now we can just Depends: wine:i386 or similar, I think.
Last time I asked, they said the first multiarch implementation will not
support that. The
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
This is the first hunk of a patch a few days ago; testbot.winehq.org
thinks it's fine: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9291
You don't need casts. If the variable has the wrong type you can change
that.
At first I didn't realize what
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
Any problems with this patch I submitted back in February?
I believe I mentioned it, or I should have. Message handler is
incomplete, cause it should return text as well, that's why it has A/W
versions. This needs tests
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
The difference between two pointers (of the same type) is the number
of elements, not the number of bytes.
That's why it was divided by element size to get 'number of elements'.
What's a problem?
Thus the code below
14 matches
Mail list logo
