On 06/02/2011 09:21 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
On 6/2/11 2:46 PM, Adam Martinson wrote:
On 06/02/2011 03:10 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Adam Martinson wrote:
+osver.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(osver);
+GetVersionExW(&osver);
+
...
+if (osver.dwMajorVersion>= 5)
Once again, tha
On 6/2/11 2:46 PM, Adam Martinson wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 03:10 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>> Adam Martinson wrote:
>>
>>> +osver.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(osver);
>>> +GetVersionExW(&osver);
>>> +
>> ...
>>> +if (osver.dwMajorVersion>= 5)
>> Once again, that's wrong way of detectin
On 06/02/2011 03:11 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Adam Martinson wrote:
+/* Check the current process and all ancestors that share its address space.
+ * Some apps run sub-processes that have the IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE
flag set, but
+ * the parent process doesn't (eg, Dragon NaturallySp
On 06/02/2011 03:10 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Adam Martinson wrote:
+osver.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(osver);
+GetVersionExW(&osver);
+
...
+if (osver.dwMajorVersion>= 5)
Once again, that's wrong way of detecting win9x, or please try to explain
better how the patch does what
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11438
Your paranoid android
Adam Martinson wrote:
> +/* Check the current process and all ancestors that share its address space.
> + * Some apps run sub-processes that have the IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE
> flag set, but
> + * the parent process doesn't (eg, Dragon NaturallySpeaking 7 setup runs
> Install Shield 6).
>
Adam Martinson wrote:
> +osver.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(osver);
> +GetVersionExW(&osver);
> +
...
> +if (osver.dwMajorVersion >= 5)
Once again, that's wrong way of detecting win9x, or please try to explain
better how the patch does what the subject describes, and for which app
it
Aric Stewart writes:
> @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
> +
> +#include "config.h"
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
Please add a license header on new files.
> +#define IS_VALID_INDEX (next < cChar)
Don't reference local variables directly, pass them to the macro.
> +#define OPTIONAL_CHAR(a) if (IS_VA
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 20:37:36 paulo lesgaz wrote:
> Yes, see bug 25660
> My tests prove that
> DDSCL_CREATEDEVICEWINDOW+DDSCL_EXCLUSIVE+DDSCL_FULLSCREEN is allowed with
> a NULL window. That is what expected by Half life I demo.
Erm, I missed that in your patch, it was right at the top of the
Aric Stewart writes:
> +void Indic_ReorderCharacters( LPWSTR input, int cChar, lexical_function lex,
> reorder_function reorder_f)
> +{
> +int index = 0;
> +int next = 0;
> +int center;
> +
> +if (!lex || ! reorder_f)
> +{
> +ERR("Failure to have required functions\n"
10 matches
Mail list logo