On 06/19/2011 09:32 PM, Thomas Mullaly wrote:
+static inline void reset_output_buffer(mxwriter *This, LPCSTR encoding)
+{
+xmlOutputBufferClose(This->buffer);
+
+if (encoding)
+This->buffer =
xmlAllocOutputBuffer(xmlFindCharEncodingHandler(encoding));
+else if (!This->dest)
+
On 06/19/2011 09:31 PM, Thomas Mullaly wrote:
+#define DEFINE_EXPECT(func) \
+static BOOL expect_ ## func = FALSE, called_ ## func = FALSE
+
+#define SET_EXPECT(func) \
+expect_ ## func = TRUE
This seems like macro-overkill. I think a struct/table here may be a
bit cleaner.
+static c
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11839
Your paranoid android
On 06/19/2011 08:15 PM, Austin Lund wrote:
[PATCH 2/4] server: Add function to count only valid handles in a process
This makes no sense. All handles are valid inside wineserver.
Vitaliy.
On 06/19/2011 08:15 PM, Austin Lund wrote:
+ret = wine_server_call( req );
+shi->Count += reply->handles;
+len = sizeof(SYSTEM_HANDLE_ENTRY)*shi->Count +
sizeof(ULONG);
+shi = RtlReAllocateHeap(GetProcessHeap(),
HEA
Thank you Jerome, this is my first patch and I pretty much bunged it all
up. I appreciate the help. So to recap, subscribe to list first so that
I can respond to messages. check. Fix my tab/spacing issue. check. and
fix my patch submission subject line so it is more in line with the
standard. check
On 06/19/2011 02:27 PM, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.wineh
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11827
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11826
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11828
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11824
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11823
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11825
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11822
Your paranoid android
On 18 June 2011 12:51, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> You don't need wined3d_wndproc_mutex_(un)lock. Just use EnterCriticalSection /
> LeaveCriticalSection directly. wined3d_mutex_lock exists because it is
> exported from wined3d.
>
I don't know, I think there's something to say for having those functio
You are severely mixing tabs and spaces, you should fix your editor.
You also have a lot of unrelated trailing whitespace changes; granted
they all remove trailing whitespace, but since this isn't a small
patch, it makes it harder to read.
J. Leclanche
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Arthur
it's not there nor in the bug link queue. so it seems someone got to it
already :)
2011/6/18
>
> Hi,
>
> by mistake i linked a wrong bug to FAR Manager:
>
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=15928
>
> Could someone remove a link from FAR to bug 27406, please?
>
>
> Tha
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 8:32:31 PM Dan Kegel wrote:
> Matches native behavior. Makes at least one app happier; see bug 27532.
Just to toss in my comments, the "native" behavior referred to is the behavior
of Creative's DLLs, but Creative's DLLs aren't the only ones available for
Windows. Ope
18 matches
Mail list logo
