Maybe gcc 4.4.5 is too old or i'm extremly dumb today :-/
Regards,
W.
I'm not a WINE developer, just scratching my own
itch :)
I have the same gcc version. Well, this might be a
legitimate issue,
another important thing would be to see the
./configure output log.
Thanks for
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:18:47PM -0700, Juan Lang wrote:
This is a false positive. ?h_addr_list is declared as a char **, and
technically it is, but gethostbyname only returns IPv4 addresses, i.e.
ones that can fit in a DWORD.
That doesn't sound like a problem that would give that
Hello Alistair,
sorry that I missed the first time. And Alexandre should have marked it
as PENDING (good idea but current implementation is rejected).
Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
Changelog:
oleaut32: COM Cleanup ICreateTypeLib2Imp
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
From
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:31:58 +0100, David Laight wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:18:47PM -0700, Juan Lang wrote:
This is a false positive. ?h_addr_list is declared as a char **,
and
technically it is, but gethostbyname only returns IPv4 addresses,
i.e.
ones that can fit in a DWORD.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com wrote:
Submitted by original author as requested by Alexandre. Necessary for
further patches by Dylan Smith to fix bug 25769.
Attached are the further patches he is referring to, which are based on his
patch series.
From
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@gmail.comwrote:
... It will take more than one person to fill Ge's shoes for providing the
testbot system and for his actions to get our efforts recognized in the
Virtual community.
I think we should modify the testbot page to
Hello,
Alexandre, is there the possibility we/you could have a release in Greg's
memory?
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@gmail.comwrote:
... It will take more than one person to
On 06/30/2011 12:22 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
The patch is rebased against today's commits -
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
The good news is, that this combo patch successfully compiles here.
The bad new is, that today's 9 newly sent patches still fails here.
I did regression test
Hi,
Been trying to run wine tests from http://test.winehq.org/data/ but
every time I try this for about the last half dozen versions I get a
blue screen and bad pool header
any suggestions? I try to support the project by doing test runs and
updating the appdb.
Regards,
Keith
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:01, Keith Muir foxb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Been trying to run wine tests from http://test.winehq.org/data/ but every
time I try this for about the last half dozen versions I get a blue screen
and bad pool header
any suggestions? I try to support the project by
There is some garbage added to the patch code, I
suspect that the way
you downloaded the patch corrupted it.
I wrote a bash script that will download the
patches correctly and apply
them:
git clean -fd
git reset --hard origin/master
for i in 75876 75883 75878 75882 75881 75884 75877
2011/6/29 Misha Koshelev misha...@gmail.com:
---
...
+else return sgn * powf(2, -14.0f) * ((float)m / 1024.0f);
...
+return sgn * powf(2, (float)e - 15.0f) * (1.0f + ((float)m /
1024.0f));
I think you don't need the explicit casts here, the values should be
automatically
Forgot that this patch was based on the previous one I sent. I should
probably resend when and if the others are committed.
On 06/29/2011 10:20 PM, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12105
Your paranoid
On 06/30/2011 02:19 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
There is some garbage added to the patch code, I
suspect that the way
you downloaded the patch corrupted it.
I wrote a bash script that will download the
patches correctly and apply
them:
git clean -fd
git reset --hard origin/master
for i in
15 matches
Mail list logo
