Right now, wine claims to use DUCET data for lingustic sorting, but by
section 1.9.2 of that document (as of version 6.0.0), uses it in a wrong
way. The result of it are bugs such as #10767 and #9583.
A possible way around it would beby using ICU to get language specific
tailoring and applying
On 10 October 2011 08:07, Octavian Voicu octavian.vo...@gmail.com wrote:
+static HRESULT delete_attached_surface_helper(IDirectDrawSurfaceImpl *root,
IDirectDrawSurfaceImpl *detach)
+{
+ if (detach-attached_iface == detach-IDirectDrawSurface4_iface)
+ return
Rafał Mużyło galtge...@o2.pl wrote:
Right now, wine claims to use DUCET data for lingustic sorting,
What's DUCET and where do you see Wine does claim to use it?
but by
section 1.9.2 of that document (as of version 6.0.0), uses it in a wrong
way.
Could you please be slightly more specific?
On 9 October 2011 17:31, Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
- I can't say I find e.g. sprinkling d3dformat_is_palettized() over
the code particularly elegant.
I suppose I could check for it in IDirect3DDevice8Impl_CreateSurface(and the
d3d9 equivalent), if all calls that create
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you just handle this in ddraw_surface_delete_attached_surface()?
I.e., replace the Release calls in
ddraw_surface?_DeleteAttachedSurface() with a
IUnknown_Release(Surf-attached_iface) in
On Monday 10 October 2011 10:20:15 Henri Verbeet wrote:
It's not really clear to me that refusing to create P8 surfaces in
d3d8/9 really gains us much, or that it's really a prerequisite for
the other patches.
I guess you've got a point here, if we just allow the surfaces we'll end up
with the
This patch is experimental but people had some interest in testing it
and I would love some more testing.
What is currently known not to be working:
* Tabs
* Font Fallback
* Complex composed glyphs are not breaking or highlighting properly.
Testing is appreceated. Send me crashes or
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:36:33AM +0200, Bernhard Loos wrote:
---
dlls/ntdll/virtual.c | 38 ++
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I think this needs tests, the algorithms are very fragile.
Ciao, Marcus
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
Should SetManagedHandler really fail if the given object doesn't
support ICorDebugManagedCallback2 ?
You've got a stray whitespace change in RuntimeHost_Destroy.
Otherwise, this looks good to me.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
leslie_alist...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:16:26PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote (and
contradicted himself):
What's DUCET and where do you see Wine does claim to use it?
DUCET: Default Unicode Collation Element Table
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10767#c1
but by
section 1.9.2 of that document (as
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:16:26PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote (and
contradicted himself):
What's DUCET and where do you see Wine does claim to use it?
DUCET: Default Unicode Collation Element Table
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10767#c1
but by
section 1.9.2 of that document (as
On 10/10/2011 02:48 AM, Rafał Mużyło wrote:
Right now, wine claims to use DUCET data for lingustic sorting, but by
section 1.9.2 of that document (as of version 6.0.0), uses it in a wrong
way. The result of it are bugs such as #10767 and #9583.
A possible way around it would beby using ICU to
Am 10.10.2011 17:33, schrieb Rafał Mużyło:
Anyway, if DUCET and Windows default differ is dumping that default even
allowed ?
I don't think so... I once was hacking on our collation stuff too to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163 but i guess dumping the windows
stuff wouldn't even
On 11/10/2011 2:07 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
Should SetManagedHandler really fail if the given object doesn't
support ICorDebugManagedCallback2 ?
Yes, this is a requirement for debugging .NET 2 applications.
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Can we have a WARN message in case of .NET 1 applications?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
leslie_alist...@hotmail.com wrote:
On 11/10/2011 2:07 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
Should SetManagedHandler really fail if the given object doesn't
support ICorDebugManagedCallback2
Hi developers,
I've just sent my first patch I would like to see in mainline. I did quite
some efforts to verify that my patch is correct by doing extensive compares
with Windows, the wine before and the patched wine as well as a special
testing version of wine.
I want to fix this bug
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 22:46, sebastian.rie...@gmx.de wrote:
---
dlls/winex11.drv/keyboard.c | 563
++-
1 files changed, 499 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
Please follow patch submission rules from
http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches
17 matches
Mail list logo
