Re: [PATCH 2/3] ddraw: SetSurfaceDesc can set width, height and pitch under certain conditions

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15824 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ddraw/tests: Extend the CreateSurface(NULL test), use own function

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15825 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/3] wininet: Use test.winehq.org instead of crossover.codeweavers.com in test_async_HttpSendRequestEx

On 12/07/11 16:52, Marvin wrote: Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] wininet: Use test.winehq.org instead of crossover.codeweavers.com in test_async_HttpSendRequestEx

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15809 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 3/3] wininet: Added more connection failure tests

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15810 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 5/6] jscript: Use bytecode for post-increment expression

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15795 Your paranoid android

Re: mshtml: Don't use WINAPI for assembly functions to avoid linker warnings on mingw

On 12/07/11 09:01, Francois Gouget wrote: #ifdef __i386__ #define DEFINE_WRAPPER_FUNC(n, off, x) \ HRESULT wrapper_func_##n(IUnknown*); \ [...] #elif defined(__x86_64__) #define DEFINE_WRAPPER_FUNC(n, x, off) \ HRESULT WINAPI wrapper_func_##n(IUnknown*); \ [...]

Re: riched20: fix memory leak

Pierre Schweitzer writes: > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ ME_UndoItem *ME_AddUndoItem(ME_TextEditor *editor, > ME_DIType type, const ME_Disp > } > default: >assert(0 == "AddUndoItem, unsupported item type"); > + ME_DestroyDisplayItem(pItem); >return NULL; It's not useful to

Re: mshtml: Don't use WINAPI for assembly functions to avoid linker warnings on mingw

> #ifdef __i386__ > > #define DEFINE_WRAPPER_FUNC(n, off, x) \ > HRESULT wrapper_func_##n(IUnknown*); \ [...] > #elif defined(__x86_64__) > > #define DEFINE_WRAPPER_FUNC(n, x, off) \ > HRESULT WINAPI wrapper_func_##n(IUnknown*); \ [...] > #else > > #define DEFINE_WRAPPER