On 3/16/2012 04:00, Aric Stewart wrote:
+HRESULT WINAPI BaseControlWindowImpl_GetTypeInfo(IVideoWindow *iface, UINT
iTInfo, LCID lcid, ITypeInfo**ppTInfo)
+{
+BaseControlWindow* This = (BaseControlWindow*)iface;
+
It doesn't look like a normal COM interface (lack of refcount for
example, a
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17386
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17392
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17391
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17390
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17389
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17388
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17387
Your paranoid android
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 13:31, Hwang YunSong(황윤성) wrote:
> fuzzy sections translated
>
Please remove the "#| msgid" comment lines (previous msgid) and resubmit.
Austin English wrote:
> +VOID WINAPI InitializeConditionVariable(PCONDITION_VARIABLE variable)
> +{
> +FIXME("stub: %p\n", variable);
> +variable = NULL;
> +}
'variable = NULL;' is a nop, you may need to add a real initialization.
--
Dmitry.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> So, I guess this change will only have any effect on non-standard
> complying sources, and in the specific case of asm-style comments, it
> brings us the behavior we want. On the other hand, it also actually
> turns an error (unexpected end o
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com writes:
> What do you suggest?
> a) remove if(winetest...) and always execute the average test
> - Live with occasional failures when the Linux scheduler decides so.
>(This is not unlike audio glitches when sometimes, Linux wakes up a thread
> after 100ms onl
Le 15 mars 2012 16:12, Aric Stewart a écrit :
> Hi Yaron,
>
> Thanks for continuing to push this forward. I have been a bit swamped
> recently. The thing is that there are several projects who are all JUST on
> the edge of being able to do what we need but none that are there yet.
>
> I got an e-
On 15 March 2012 11:54, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
> +typedef unsigned char cpp_bool;
> +#define bool cpp_bool
> +cpp_quote("#define PRBool cpp_bool") /* FIXME */
Is there any chance this is going to conflict with bool from
stdbool.h? Technically that's C99, and we don't use C99, but I imagine
it could
Hi Yaron,
Thanks for continuing to push this forward. I have been a bit swamped
recently. The thing is that there are several projects who are all JUST
on the edge of being able to do what we need but none that are there yet.
I got an e-mail from a pootle developer saying that they are doing
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17375
Your paranoid android
On 03/15/12 13:18, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.winehq.org/
Il 14 marzo 2012 23:02, Józef Kucia ha scritto:
> @@ -679,11 +649,23 @@ void pp_writestring(const char *format, ...)
> }
> }
> \\. add_string(ppy_text, ppy_leng);
> -\n {
> +\n {
> newline(1);
> add_string(ppy_text, ppy_le
Hey guys!
Sorry for being so pushy but please tell me who do I need to talk to in
order to push this forward.
I can't use my Linux machine during the week and I don't have time to
create patches, establishing a Web interface will help me improve and
maintain the Hebrew translation of Wine.
Thanks
Hi,
>sometimes one DeleteTimerQueueTimer(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
>fails (presumably with IO_PENDING) because a callback was executing
>concurrently.
This random failure rose an alarm. I looked at it further and found out that
the current testsuite is not complete enough to demonstrate that given
IN
20 matches
Mail list logo
