Alexandre wrote:
> It's common practice to avoid it, to make things like -Wundef more useful.
Good point.
Reading http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-01-04.html makes
me sad. -Wundef would be a lot more useful if autoconf defined symbols
to zero instead of undefining them; then we could
Dan Kegel writes:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>> Isn't this a no-op? I thought that an undefined symbol was
>>> treated as false by the preprocessor.
>>
>> Actually you may be right. But then this is the only place in Wine w
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> Isn't this a no-op? I thought that an undefined symbol was
>> treated as false by the preprocessor.
>
> Actually you may be right. But then this is the only place in Wine where
> we rely on this and
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Dan Kegel wrote:
> -#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H) && defined(IPCTL_STATS) &&
> (HAVE_STRUCT_IPSTAT_IPS_TOTAL || HAVE_STRUCT_IP_STATS_IPS_TOTAL)
> +#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H) && defined(IPCTL_STATS) &&
> (defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IPSTAT_IPS_TOTAL) ||
> defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IP
Jacek Caban writes:
> ---
> dlls/wininet/tests/Makefile.in |2 +-
> dlls/wininet/tests/http.c | 38
> ++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M wininet.dll -T ../../.. -p
win
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> On 06/08/12 03:15, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
>> + *ppvObject = NULL;
>> + if ( IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IDictionary ) ||
>> + IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IPersist ) ||
>> + IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IDispatch ) ||
>
-#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H) && defined(IPCTL_STATS) &&
(HAVE_STRUCT_IPSTAT_IPS_TOTAL || HAVE_STRUCT_IP_STATS_IPS_TOTAL)
+#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H) && defined(IPCTL_STATS) &&
(defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IPSTAT_IPS_TOTAL) ||
defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IP_STATS_IPS_TOTAL))
Isn't this a no-op? I thoug
On 06/08/12 16:10, Erich E. Hoover wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> ...
>> Did you test indexes like 'alert("really!?")' ? :)
>> Seriously, HTMLDocument is not the right tool for the job.
> I can. Do you have a suggestion for an alternative?
I don't know any helper
On 06/08/12 15:13, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.winehq.org/
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18903
Your paranoid android
On 8/06/2012 7:15 PM, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetai
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18891
Your paranoid android
Hi Vijay,
On 06/08/12 03:15, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> +*ppvObject = NULL;
> +if ( IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IDictionary ) ||
> + IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IPersist ) ||
> + IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IDispatch ) ||
> + IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IUnknown ) )
> +{
> +
Hi Erich,
On 06/07/12 23:09, Erich E. Hoover wrote:
> +/* Post the HTML text to the document */
> +array = SafeArrayCreateVector(VT_VARIANT, 0, 1);
> +if(!array)
> +goto cleanup;
> +hr = SafeArrayAccessData(array, (LPVOID*)&array_param);
> +if (FAILED(hr))
> +go
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18890
Your paranoid android
15 matches
Mail list logo
