Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19585
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19586
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19594
Your paranoid
Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit image) ===
image.c:2811: Test failed: 0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
image.c:2811: Test failed: 2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
image.c:2811: Test failed: 3: expected property size 20 or 0, got 28
===
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru wrote:
Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit image) ===
image.c:2811: Test failed: 0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
image.c:2811: Test failed: 2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
image.c:2811: Test failed:
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 11:34 +0300, John Yani wrote:
+static void fill_logicaldisk( struct table *table )
+{
+static const WCHAR fmtW[] = {'%','u',0};
+WCHAR device_id[11];
+struct record_logicaldisk *rec;
+UINT num_rows = 1;
+FIXME(returns a fake logical disks table\n);
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19595
Your paranoid
2012/6/27 Nozomi Kodama nozomi.kod...@yahoo.com:
-@ stub D3DXSHScale(ptr long ptr ptr)
+@ stdcall D3DXSHScale(ptr long ptr ptr)
...
+FLOAT* WINAPI D3DXSHScale(FLOAT *out, UINT order, CONST FLOAT *a,
CONST FLOAT scale)
The last parameter doesn't match between the function prototype and
the spec
Vincent Povirk madewokh...@gmail.com wrote:
static HRESULT WINAPI BitmapScaler_GetSize(IWICBitmapScaler *iface,
UINT *puiWidth, UINT *puiHeight)
{
-FIXME((%p,%p,%p): stub\n, iface, puiWidth, puiHeight);
+BitmapScaler *This = impl_from_IWICBitmapScaler(iface);
+
Good point. I'll resend with parameter checking.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru wrote:
Vincent Povirk madewokh...@gmail.com wrote:
static HRESULT WINAPI BitmapScaler_GetSize(IWICBitmapScaler *iface,
UINT *puiWidth, UINT *puiHeight)
{
-
Hello all,
Is it possible to run a 32bit application using 64bit ODBC drivers?
I already checked that standard 32bit wine compilation does not work -
but will it work with WoW64? I am trying to get an application to
connect to SQL Server via tdsodbc, but unfortunately tdsodbc:i386 in
ubuntu 11.10
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:41 +0300, John Yani wrote:
+static void fill_logicaldisk( struct table *table )
+{
+static const WCHAR device_id[] = {'0',0};
+struct record_logicaldisk *rec;
+FIXME(returns a fake logical disks table\n);
+if (!(table-data = heap_alloc( sizeof(*rec)
On 27/06/2012 7:35 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit image) ===
image.c:2811: Test failed: 0: expected property size 17 or 36, got 44
image.c:2811: Test failed: 2: expected property size 144 or 0, got 152
image.c:2811: Test failed:
Ben Peddell klightsp...@netspace.net.au wrote:
Looks like testbot picked up wrong e-mail sequence. It looks like an e-mail
delivery problem in the mailing list software, and it is getting pretty
annoying.
The winehq.org mailserver only allows one SMTP connection per relaying
IP, so
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19625
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19631
Your paranoid
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Austin English wrote:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31038
Noot: Het wordt aanbevolen om distributiepakketten te gebruiken. Zie a
-href=http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko voor details.
+href=http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko/a voor details.
Note that this is missing a lot
17 matches
Mail list logo
