Hello,
Please ignore this series of patch, I'll provide a fix for the failure test.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21462
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21461
Your paranoid android
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:05:42AM -0700, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 5 September 2012 22:45, Andy Ritger wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:26:23AM -0700, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> >> From Wine's point of view, we'd just get a bunch of extra code to maintain
> >> because nvidia does things differen
Jacek Caban writes:
> dlls/mshtml/htmlwindow.c |1 -
> dlls/mshtml/mshtml_private.h |1 -
> dlls/mshtml/script.c | 18 ++
> dlls/mshtml/tests/vbtest.html | 15 +--
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here on
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> As I mentioned earlier, the testbot can't handle vcomp.dll tests
> until a fix for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31609
> is deployed.
>
> It can handle vcomp100.dll tests, though (no manifest). I guess I can submit
> the series again wit
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21447
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21446
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21445
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21444
Your paranoid android
As I mentioned earlier, the testbot can't handle vcomp.dll tests
until a fix for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31609
is deployed.
It can handle vcomp100.dll tests, though (no manifest). I guess I can submit
the series again with the vcomp100 forwarding and tests
in a sixth patch, that wo
On 2012-09-07 15:24, Sergey Guralnik wrote:
This patch based on MSDN's description of WNDCLASSEX structure:
...
hIconSm: Handle to a small icon that is associated with the window
class.
If this member is NULL, the system searches the icon resource
specified
by the hIcon memb
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21432
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21433
Your paranoid android
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> You should avoid that sort of thing, it will be hard to debug,
> particularly since get_ttf_nametable_entry itself has ok() calls. Store
> the result in a variable instead.
Thanks for review!
I've sent a improved version.
--
Re
Henri Verbeet writes:
> @@ -2931,3 +2965,14 @@ DECL_HANDLER(set_cursor)
> reply->new_clip= input->desktop->cursor.clip;
> reply->last_change = input->desktop->cursor.last_change;
> }
> +
> +DECL_HANDLER(update_rawinput_devices)
> +{
> +const struct rawinput_device *devices = ge
16 matches
Mail list logo