On 9/10/2012 8:54 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 9 October 2012 11:26, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
wrote:
Changelog:
scrrun: Implement IDictionary_Add and Count
Actually, does it ever make sense to use a linked list at all to
implement a dictionary? It seems to me that if you only ever have a
h
Le 12/10/2012 06:32, Nikolay Sivov a écrit :
On 10/12/2012 00:46, Christian Costa wrote:
---
dlls/amstream/mediastreamfilter.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/amstream/mediastreamfilter.c
b/dlls/amstream/mediastreamfilter.c
index ee9
On 10/12/2012 00:59, Christian Costa wrote:
---
dlls/amstream/amstream.c | 12 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-TRACE("(%p/%p)->(%s,%x)\n", This, iface, debugstr_w(pszFileName), dwFlags);
+TRACE("(%p/%p)->(%s,%x)\n", This, iface, debugstr_w(filenam
On 10/12/2012 00:46, Christian Costa wrote:
---
dlls/amstream/mediastreamfilter.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/amstream/mediastreamfilter.c
b/dlls/amstream/mediastreamfilter.c
index ee9d970..0e56a68 100644
--- a/dlls/amstream/medias
Frédéric Delanoy writes:
> When there are several test files, indicates which file error line numbers
> relate to, making
> "debugging" easier.
That's what trace() is for.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Daniel Lehman writes:
> I'll admit that the upper 32 bits being set was because of a quirk in
> our C++ code, but similar values passed to Windows worked
This would need some test cases.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Vincas Miliūnas wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 04:30 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > "Vincas Miliūnas" wrote:
> >
> >> * Renamed DUMMYUNIONNAME to u.
> > ...
> >> +typedef struct _FILE_ID_DESCRIPTOR {
> >> +DWORDdwSize;
> >> +FILE_ID_TYPE Type;
> >> +union {
> >>
On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> This patch alone makes SunSpider 0.9 17x faster.
Seems to me that something is really wrong with our BSTR implementation if
replacing it with a home-grown implementation speeds this up by a factor of 17.
Chip
"Vincas Miliūnas" wrote:
> Unless you mind sharing why it is wrong, I will not be able to read your
> mind.
Just do your homework and have a look at other places that use DUMMYUNIONNAME.
--
Dmitry.
On 10/11/2012 04:30 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Vincas Miliūnas" wrote:
>
>> * Renamed DUMMYUNIONNAME to u.
> ...
>> +typedef struct _FILE_ID_DESCRIPTOR {
>> +DWORDdwSize;
>> +FILE_ID_TYPE Type;
>> +union {
>> +LARGE_INTEGER FileId;
>> +GUID ObjectId
> It can't, the code explicitly casts handle to unsigned before the
> shift.
It's cast to a 64-bit unsigned, so the upper 32 bits are kept for the shift
One of the pointers passed in was: 0xff26a8
after the shift, it became:
0xff26a8 => 0x3fc9aa
When assigned to the 32
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22127
Your paranoid android
On 10/11/12 12:39, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 11 October 2012 12:16, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> +struct _jsstr_t {
>> +unsigned length_flags;
>> +unsigned ref;
>> +WCHAR str[1];
>> +};
> It's probably much too late for jscript, and perhaps Wine in general,
> but strictly speaking the _t suff
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22123
Your paranoid android
On 10/11/12 00:27, Daniel Lehman wrote:
-if(!base && first->strbuf && first->val==digits[0]) {
+if(first->strbuf && first->val==digits[0]) {
+found_zero = TRUE;
istreambuf_iterator_wchar_inc(first);
if(first->strbuf && (first->val==mb_to_wc('x', &this->cvt) ||
fi
Hi,
>Von: Marvin [test...@testbot.winehq.org]
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2012 15:34
>While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
>Patch failed to apply
As Marvin woke up 5 days after patch submission, it did not realize that
patches 1-6 had been applied since.
On 11 October 2012 12:16, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
> +struct _jsstr_t {
> +unsigned length_flags;
> +unsigned ref;
> +WCHAR str[1];
> +};
It's probably much too late for jscript, and perhaps Wine in general,
but strictly speaking the _t suffix is reserved by POSIX.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22114
Your paranoid android
David Laight wrote:
>> InterlockedExchange(&status, wmm->dwStatus);
>That use of InterlockedExchange() is OTT.
Thank you for the clarification.
I've come across
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM/PracticalUsage
and found the official expression for what I've
19 matches
Mail list logo
