Hello,
FWIW, Adam Martinson's named pipe series looks good to me. I tested it
with MS SQL Server, which uses message mode pipes, and did not run
into any problems. In current git I can't connect to server using
named pipes, because as soon as SetNamedPipeHandleState returns false,
client applicatio
André Hentschel writes:
> +__ms_va_start(parms, format);
> +len = vsprintfW(output_bufW, format, parms);
> +__ms_va_end(parms);
You can't mix vsprintfW and ms_va_list.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Looks like I won't be around when this finishes, but I sent a test to
testbot: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23638
This should succeed if your implementation is correct (data is
referenced, not copied).
>> I'm pretty sure CreateBitmapFromMemory copies the data rather than
>> referencing existing data.
>
> How do you know that? In any case adding a test case and support for that
> behaviour should be pretty trivial once this patch is accepted.
I believe it was this stack overflow question that fir
Vincent Povirk wrote:
> I'm pretty sure CreateBitmapFromMemory copies the data rather than
> referencing existing data.
How do you know that? In any case adding a test case and support for that
behaviour should be pretty trivial once this patch is accepted.
--
Dmitry.
Am 27.12.2012 12:24, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> André Hentschel writes:
>
>> +STRINGTABLE
>> +{
>> + IDS_TCP_UNKNOWN, "???"
>> + IDS_TCP_CLOSED, "CLOSED"
>> + IDS_TCP_LISTENING, "LISTENING"
>> + IDS_TCP_SYN_SENT,"SYN_SENT"
>> + IDS_TCP_SYN_RCVD,"SYN_RCVD"
>> + IDS_TCP_
I'm pretty sure CreateBitmapFromMemory copies the data rather than
referencing existing data.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> ---
> dlls/windowscodecs/bitmap.c| 31 +--
> dlls/windowscodecs/imgfactory.c| 18 +++---
André Hentschel writes:
> +STRINGTABLE
> +{
> + IDS_TCP_UNKNOWN, "???"
> + IDS_TCP_CLOSED, "CLOSED"
> + IDS_TCP_LISTENING, "LISTENING"
> + IDS_TCP_SYN_SENT,"SYN_SENT"
> + IDS_TCP_SYN_RCVD,"SYN_RCVD"
> + IDS_TCP_ESTABLISHED, "ESTABLISHED"
> + IDS_TCP_FIN_WAIT1, "FIN_WAI
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23632
Your paranoid android
