Vincent Povirk wrote:
> I guess I prefer to keep interfaces as simple as possible even if it
> means writing more code? I'd consider writing a helper function, but
> none of the other methods would use it.
Is there any hurry with CreateBitmapFromMemory implementation, or you
somehow prefer your
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> It's better to actually check return value of IWICBitmapLock_GetDataPointer
> before memecpy(), or if that's not supposed to fail drop 'hr' assignment.
Whoops, good catch. (I don't think it can fail, but I didn't mean to
make that assumpt
Vincent Povirk wrote:
> +hr = IWICBitmap_Lock(bitmap, NULL, WICBitmapLockWrite, &lock);
> +if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
> +{
> +UINT buffersize;
> +BYTE *buffer;
> +
> +hr = IWICBitmapLock_GetDataPointer(lock, &buffersize, &buffer);
> +
> +
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23718
Your paranoid android
On 2012-12-28 10:22-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
[...Let's] leave
it like this. Wine-1.5.20 has introduced an obvious regression for an
important Windows app (the MinGW gcc compiler for Windows) that has
been working for years for prior Wine versions.
Grant communicated to me off list that he was
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23709
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23710
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23712
Your paranoid android
On Jan 2, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Per Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:05 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
>>
>> Not sure if you can do it like that, as i understand it winebuild should
>> always be able to crosscompile something, these ifdefs would destroy that
>> feature.
Only on Mac OS :).
Hi André,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:08 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Hi,
> FWIW i have just seen:
>
>
> https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=testbot.winehq.org&hideResults=on
>
> https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=test.winehq.org&hideResults=on
>
> https://www.ssllabs.com/ss
On Jan 2, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Per Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
>> What kind of undefined symbol errors? Other than the ones I got because
>> as(1) from cctools can't grok CFI pseudo-ops (and probably never will
>> because of Clang), I don't know of a
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:05 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
>
> Not sure if you can do it like that, as i understand it winebuild should
> always be able to crosscompile something, these ifdefs would destroy that
> feature.
I suppose the correct way is to always use clang without target_alias
prefix
Per Johansson writes:
> This makes clang exit with error on unsupported warnings.
You'd need to check if -Werror is supported first.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Hi,
FWIW i have just seen:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=testbot.winehq.org&hideResults=on
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=test.winehq.org&hideResults=on
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=winehq.org&hideResults=on&ignoreMismatch=on
which tells me we ha
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: netstat: Initial implementation (try 2)
Datum: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:39:54 +0100
Von: André Hentschel
An: Wine Devel
Am 28.12.2012 23:10, schrieb Frédéric Delanoy:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:03 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
>> +#define IDS_TCP_UNKNO
Am 02.01.2013 02:56, schrieb Charles Davis:
> --- a/tools/winebuild/utils.c
> +++ b/tools/winebuild/utils.c
> @@ -345,10 +345,22 @@ struct strarray *get_as_command(void)
>
> if (!as_command)
> {
> +#ifdef CLANG_AS
> +/* The native assembler might not support CFI pseudo-ops,
> +
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23691
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23692
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23693
Your paranoid android
On 01/02/13 14:38, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> 2013/1/1 Rico Schüller :
>> ---
>> dlls/d3dx9_36/shader.c | 16 +++-
>> dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/shader.c | 21 +
>> 2 Dateien geändert, 32 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 5 Zeilen entfernt(-)
>>
> +static inline BOOL is_valid_byteco
2013/1/1 Andrew Talbot :
> Changelog:
> d3dcompiler_43: Avoid signed-unsigned integer comparisons.
>
> diff --git a/dlls/d3dcompiler_43/bytecodewriter.c
> b/dlls/d3dcompiler_43/bytecodewriter.c
> index d10f6bc..17289d2 100644
> --- a/dlls/d3dcompiler_43/bytecodewriter.c
> +++ b/dlls/d3dcompile
2013/1/1 Rico Schüller :
> ---
> dlls/d3dx9_36/shader.c | 16 +++-
> dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/shader.c | 21 +
> 2 Dateien geändert, 32 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 5 Zeilen entfernt(-)
>
+static inline BOOL is_valid_bytecode(DWORD token)
+{
+token &= 0x;
+
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23688
Your paranoid android
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Charles Davis wrote:
> What kind of undefined symbol errors? Other than the ones I got because as(1)
> from cctools can't grok CFI pseudo-ops (and probably never will because of
> Clang), I don't know of any symbol problems building Wine with Clang on Mac
> OS.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23686
Your paranoid android
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-01-02 12:42, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 2 January 2013 12:26, Stefan Dösinger
> wrote:
>> Fixes bug 32485.
> I'm sure we've had this discussion wrt. commit messages before,
> but this tells me just about nothing about what problem this patch
On 2 January 2013 12:26, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Fixes bug 32485.
I'm sure we've had this discussion wrt. commit messages before, but
this tells me just about nothing about what problem this patch is
supposed to fix, or why this is the correct solution. Also, do you
have tests for this?
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23681
Your paranoid android
28 matches
Mail list logo
