On 1/6/2013 02:55, Daniel Jelinski wrote:
They are unrelated, except by file modified, and I'm sending them as I
create them, but of course I can defer sending them a little.
Do you mean message sequence tests or something else? I tested that
visually with delphi, but I guess that's not what you'
On 1/6/2013 02:25, Daniel Jelinski wrote:
This one needs tests. Also even if each patch applies cleanly, please
send them in series, it makes it easier to review.
On 1/5/2013 18:56, Daniel Jelinski wrote:
Interesting:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23746&log_206=1#k206
Looks like testbot tried to do the entire test suite, even though I
changed only one test file.
2013/1/5 Marvin :
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23752
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23747
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23751
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23748
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23750
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23749
Your paranoid android
Interesting:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23746&log_206=1#k206
Looks like testbot tried to do the entire test suite, even though I
changed only one test file.
2013/1/5 Marvin :
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and al
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23746
Your paranoid android
Am 04.01.2013 um 12:02 schrieb Henri Verbeet :
> Since user pointer draws were removed, state->user_stream will only ever be
> set for "strided" draws, and device_stream_info_from_declaration() is never
> called for those.
I have some patches in my tree that remove draw_primitive_strided and
use
Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > > First of all: The issues your are pointing out have been in the previous
> > > version of the patch too. Why didn't you complain in your first review.
> > > To my understanding this is a wast of my time complaining about two
> > > issues and keeping the rest secret fo
Saturday 29 December 2012 Dmitry Timoshkov
> Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > First of all: The issues your are pointing out have been in the previous
> > version of the patch too. Why didn't you complain in your first review.
> > To my understanding this is a wast of my time complaining about two
> >
André Hentschel writes:
> We should decide soon if we want to accept that patch, because it
> breaks DOSBox compatiblity. So in case we commit it we should change
> it in dosbox before they release 0.75
> AJ?
No, that would also break compatibility with existing prefixes.
--
Alexandre Julliard
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:33 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> ---
> news/de/2012122101.xml~ | 17 +
Not sure checking in your editor backup file is a good idea ;)
Frédéric
16 matches
Mail list logo