Hello
Any problem with the patch
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/94777
and
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/94776 ?
Nozomi.
On 03/11/13 21:23, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mathis Beer writes:
>
>> diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c b/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
>> index a99bca4..e4f2bb6 100644
>> --- a/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
>> +++ b/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
>> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ WINE_DECLARE_DEBUG_CHANNEL(module);
>> #define MS_SYN
Mathis Beer writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c b/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
> index a99bca4..e4f2bb6 100644
> --- a/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
> +++ b/dlls/ntdll/virtual.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ WINE_DECLARE_DEBUG_CHANNEL(module);
> #define MS_SYNC 0
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef MS_ASYNC
> +#define MS_AS
larmbr zhan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Andrew Talbot
> wrote:
>> msvcp60: Avoid signed-unsigned integer comparisons.
>
>
> Hi, Andrew Talbot.
>
> I find that you are working on these "Avoid signed-unsigned integer
> comparisons" things recently.
>
> I DO agree on that using _
2013/3/11 Jeff Layton :
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:25:31 +0400
> Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>
>> to make it match CIFS and VFS variants.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky
>> ---
>> fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2maperro
2013/3/11 Jeff Layton :
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:25:28 +0400
> Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>
>> If O_DENYMAND flag is specified, O_DENYREAD/WRITE/MAND flags are
>> translated to flock's flags:
>>
>> !O_DENYREAD -> LOCK_READ
>> !O_DENYWRITE -> LOCK_WRITE
>> O_DENYMAND -> LOCK_MAND
>>
>> and set throu
2013/3/5 Simo :
> On 03/05/2013 01:13 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:49:46PM -0500, Simo wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/04/2013 04:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
I'm a little more worried: these are mandatory locks, and applications
that use them are used to the locks be
Francois Gouget wrote:
> I think it's really a three patch series and the first one has the
> clearer commit message:
>
> Made NtDelayExecution with a 0 timeout yield the CPU, as it is
> supposed to.
I agree that this is the correct behaviour for the "zero timeout"
case. The comments that
On 3/11/2013 16:36, Jeff Latimer wrote:
+if (!ppv) return E_INVALIDARG;
You don't need this most likely.
+IUnknown_AddRef((IUnknown*)*ppv);
A cleaner way is to AddRef original iface, but that's a matter of taste.
+static ULONG WINAPI WMCreateEditor_AddRef(IWMMetadataEditor *iface)
+
On 3/11/2013 13:41, Jeff Latimer wrote:
On 11/03/13 17:43, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 3/11/2013 10:27, Jeff Latimer wrote:
---
include/nserror.h | 226
++
1 file changed, 226 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/nserror.h
+#ifndef _NSERR
On 11/03/13 17:43, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 3/11/2013 10:27, Jeff Latimer wrote:
>> ---
>> include/nserror.h | 226
>> ++
>> 1 file changed, 226 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 include/nserror.h
>> +#ifndef _NSERROR_H
>> +#define _NSERRO
11 matches
Mail list logo