On 05/05/2013 12:09 AM, Sam Edwards wrote:
On 05/04/2013 08:27 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
OK. Let's summarize:
There are some fonts where tmHeight is in fact 0. If Hin-Tak Leang is
correct, these may be Open-Source fonts possibly with proprietary
equivalents. Since I have hundreds of fon
On 05/04/2013 08:27 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
OK. Let's summarize:
There are some fonts where tmHeight is in fact 0. If Hin-Tak Leang is
correct, these may be Open-Source fonts possibly with proprietary
equivalents. Since I have hundreds of fonts installed on my system, it
is almost c
On Sat, 04 May 2013 19:13:07 -0400, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> I have no objection to someone writing an alternative patch and backing
> this one out when that patch goes in, but until then, this patch, or
> something like it, needs to be applied. With wine throwing the
> exception, some Apps a
OK. Let's summarize:
There are some fonts where tmHeight is in fact 0. If Hin-Tak Leang is
correct, these may be Open-Source fonts possibly with proprietary
equivalents. Since I have hundreds of fonts installed on my system, it
is almost certain that I have one or more. Identifying which wit
On 05/04/2013 05:13 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
Having wine throw an exception where it did not do so before is another
kind of problem indicator. One that hardly needs a special conformance
test.
Hmm. As I suspected, that is a single point pass only test. It does
not explore any of th
On 05/04/2013 07:50 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
I'd like to mention two things:
- there were(are?) overflows/underflows within Freetype itself, up to
and including 2.4.11 - the fixes went into trunk, but AFAIK 2.4.12
isn't release yet. That's specifically affect 32-bit platform, and
emulated
--- On Sun, 5/5/13, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> On 05/04/2013 05:37 PM, Sam Edwards
> wrote:
> > On 05/04/2013 12:59 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> >>
> >>You are trying to make this about me. It is
> not. Windows fairly
> >> obviously does not do this 'sanity' test.
> Wine is supposed to
On 05/04/2013 05:37 PM, Sam Edwards wrote:
On 05/04/2013 12:59 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
You are trying to make this about me. It is not. Windows fairly
obviously does not do this 'sanity' test. Wine is supposed to imitate
windows. To do this absolutely correctly, the whole 'sanity' te
On 05/04/2013 12:59 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
You are trying to make this about me. It is not. Windows fairly
obviously does not do this 'sanity' test. Wine is supposed to imitate
windows. To do this absolutely correctly, the whole 'sanity' test
should go away.
This sounds like an excell
On 05/04/2013 11:30 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
If you REALLY think the font should not load, you should add code to
reject the font with an appropriate diagnostic, not have this code
throw a divide by zero exception and abort execution. Until you do
that, this pat
Hi, everyone.
Thank you for your viewing and comments on the proposal. Sorry
that the rough plan is kind of mess and now I've rewritten this part a
little more like a Time Schedule. I appreciate it if you have a glance
at it.
>From now to 27th, May.
Work on some basic knowledge such as the u
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> >> If you REALLY think the font should not load, you should add code to
> >> reject the font with an appropriate diagnostic, not have this code
> >> throw a divide by zero exception and abort execution. Until you do
> >> that, this patch is needed.
> >
> > First, wh
On 05/04/2013 10:50 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
If you REALLY think the font should not load, you should add code to
reject the font with an appropriate diagnostic, not have this code
throw a divide by zero exception and abort execution. Until you do
that, this pat
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> If you REALLY think the font should not load, you should add code to
> reject the font with an appropriate diagnostic, not have this code
> throw a divide by zero exception and abort execution. Until you do
> that, this patch is needed.
First, what is needed, is an
On 05/04/2013 01:56 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
+if ( font->aveWidth && font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight ) {
+if (((font->aveWidth + font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight - 1) /
+ font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight) > 100) {
Hi,
Thanks everybody for your help!
I already started to work on it, the application is split into 3 components :
- the linux vst plugin (template)
- the wine vst host (compiled in 32bits and 64bits, with wineg++)
- the plugin maker
First you call plugin make on the windows vst dll, the plugin ma
Christopher Cope writes:
> Can someone provide some follow up on this? There is a problem with
> the current code. The way I fixed it allows the end user to set the
> mode with xinput. That seems preferable to having to apply a patch to
> wine if the mouse in use doesn't work.
I'd suggest to fil
Can someone provide some follow up on this? There is a problem with the current
code. The way I fixed it allows the end user to set the mode with xinput. That
seems preferable to having to apply a patch to wine if the mouse in use doesn't
work.
Christopher Cope wrote:
>The way I set it was to
18 matches
Mail list logo
