On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Austin English wrote:
>> diff --git
>> a/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0.spec
>>
>> b/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1
On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Austin English wrote:
> diff --git
> a/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0.spec
>
> b/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0.spec
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..cc15d4e
> ---
Piotr Caban writes:
> @@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ struct rawinput_device
> obj_handle_t handle; /* duplicated handle in dst process */
> int self; /* is the source the current process? */
> int closed; /* whether the source handle has been closed
> */
2013/6/4 Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Christian Costa
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Minor but shouldn't it be "bug" instead "bugs"?
>
> At least in portuguese zero is plural.
Ta! Mas nao nehum?
> In english according to [1] :
>
> Treatments differ in expre
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Christian Costa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Minor but shouldn't it be "bug" instead "bugs"?
At least in portuguese zero is plural. In english according to [1] :
Treatments differ in expressions of zero quantity: English often uses
the plural in such expressions as no inju
Hi,
Minor but shouldn't it be "bug" instead "bugs"?
Christian
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Ken Thomases wrote:
>
>> ---
>> dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.h |2 ++
>> dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.m |3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> I wonder, do you actually run 'make test' in dlls/user32/tests with
> y
Ken Thomases wrote:
> ---
> dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.h |2 ++
> dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.m |3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
I wonder, do you actually run 'make test' in dlls/user32/tests with
your changes? My guess is that you don't.
--
Dmitry.
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:16 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> 1020943 Uninitialized scalar variable
>
> After suggestion by Hans, do it in the helper ... especially
> as the other external callers do not initialize schemes either.
I also said that you shouldn't touch the parameter on error :) The
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, André Hentschel wrote:
[...]
> Ah, ok. Didn't know. So the question is if François will continue to
> run winetest on his NT4 machines (outside of testbot), if so, we
> should not yet remove NT4 "hacks" in the testsuite.
I will continue running them until the WineTest site st
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 01:36 +0200, Marti Maria wrote:
> > (specifically cmsReadRawTag and cmsWriteRawTag don't do what we want),
>
> Ops, so I did something wrong. These functions were in the API to
> implement mscms
> and JDK APIs. Could you please elaborate what the issue is?
They don't allow
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 00:48 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> Hans, you found a way to change Wine to use getter/setter functions
> while still linking to lcms v1 and than switch to lcms2?
No, I'm not interested in doing that.
12 matches
Mail list logo