Re: api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0: add stub dll

2013-06-04 Thread Austin English
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Charles Davis wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Austin English wrote: >> diff --git >> a/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0.spec >> >> b/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1

Re: api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0: add stub dll

2013-06-04 Thread Charles Davis
On Jun 4, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Austin English wrote: > diff --git > a/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0.spec > > b/dlls/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-core-localregistry-l1-1-0.spec > new file mode 100644 > index 000..cc15d4e > ---

Re: [PATCH 1/2] server: Don't create new handle when DUP_HANDLE_CLOSE_SOURCE is used if possible (try2)

2013-06-04 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Piotr Caban writes: > @@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ struct rawinput_device > obj_handle_t handle; /* duplicated handle in dst process */ > int self; /* is the source the current process? */ > int closed; /* whether the source handle has been closed > */

Re: bugzilla: Change no bugs found message

2013-06-04 Thread Christian Costa
2013/6/4 Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Christian Costa > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Minor but shouldn't it be "bug" instead "bugs"? > > At least in portuguese zero is plural. Ta! Mas nao nehum? > In english according to [1] : > > Treatments differ in expre

Re: bugzilla: Change no bugs found message

2013-06-04 Thread Bruno Jesus
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Christian Costa wrote: > > Hi, > > Minor but shouldn't it be "bug" instead "bugs"? At least in portuguese zero is plural. In english according to [1] : Treatments differ in expressions of zero quantity: English often uses the plural in such expressions as no inju

Re: bugzilla: Change no bugs found message

2013-06-04 Thread Christian Costa
Hi, Minor but shouldn't it be "bug" instead "bugs"? Christian

Re: [PATCH 1/8] winemac: Don't unminimize a window on first activation during start-up.

2013-06-04 Thread Ken Thomases
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Ken Thomases wrote: > >> --- >> dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.h |2 ++ >> dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.m |3 ++- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > I wonder, do you actually run 'make test' in dlls/user32/tests with > y

Re: [PATCH 1/8] winemac: Don't unminimize a window on first activation during start-up.

2013-06-04 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Ken Thomases wrote: > --- > dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.h |2 ++ > dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.m |3 ++- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) I wonder, do you actually run 'make test' in dlls/user32/tests with your changes? My guess is that you don't. -- Dmitry.

Re: [PATCH] winhttp: initialize schemes (Coverity) (resubmit)

2013-06-04 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:16 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > 1020943 Uninitialized scalar variable > > After suggestion by Hans, do it in the helper ... especially > as the other external callers do not initialize schemes either. I also said that you shouldn't touch the parameter on error :) The

Re: testbot and NT4

2013-06-04 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, André Hentschel wrote: [...] > Ah, ok. Didn't know. So the question is if François will continue to > run winetest on his NT4 machines (outside of testbot), if so, we > should not yet remove NT4 "hacks" in the testsuite. I will continue running them until the WineTest site st

Re: [Lcms-user] mscms: Use lcms2, when available [try 2]

2013-06-04 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 01:36 +0200, Marti Maria wrote: > > (specifically cmsReadRawTag and cmsWriteRawTag don't do what we want), > > Ops, so I did something wrong. These functions were in the API to > implement mscms > and JDK APIs. Could you please elaborate what the issue is? They don't allow

Re: mscms: Use lcms2, when available [try 2]

2013-06-04 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 00:48 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > Hans, you found a way to change Wine to use getter/setter functions > while still linking to lcms v1 and than switch to lcms2? No, I'm not interested in doing that.