Re: Three year sever outstanding bug requiring minor fix

2010-06-11 Thread Aneurin Price
Is it a legal requirement that everyone working on WINE must be a complete arsehole, or just a project requirement? Nye

Re: fixing all the not-properly-displaying characters that have suddenly appeared in the appdb

2008-12-17 Thread Aneurin Price
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:13:31 +0100 > Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote: > >> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 20:52:04 Rosanne DiMesio wrote: >> > Since the change to the new design, AppDB entries have been displaying >> > either a ? (Firefox,

Re: To K&R or not

2006-06-04 Thread Aneurin Price
EA Durbin wrote: One could just write a perl script to parse the code upon submission that would convert it from K & R style to a uniform standard that it easy to read, and fix things like the amount of spaces in an indent. And thus the discussion comes full circle.

Re: To K&R or not

2006-06-02 Thread Aneurin Price
That said, I don't care what people do, I can read both... In my perfect world though, my SCM client would convert source code to my preferred format on checkout, and to whatever universal format the repository uses on checkin. Ho hum... (Personally I hate K&R because I want to be able to s

Re: License question

2006-05-22 Thread Aneurin Price
contribute *directly* back, as the conversion from GPL back to LGPL is impossible - though you could dual-license your code, and still comply with the existing license. Hope that helps :P. Aneurin Price

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-05 Thread Aneurin Price
Con Kolivas wrote: Is it kernel dependant? Does 2.6.11 for example exhibit the problem or only recent kernels? Or has noone tried an older kernel like that? Cheers, Con Just to reiterate since everybody seems to forget this part: The problem does *not* occur when using a 2.4 kernel. Addition

Re: Implement THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL

2006-04-03 Thread Aneurin Price
Mike Hearn wrote: I'm not convinced this is true. At least some (maybe most or all) of the games showing this problem work just fine if true OSS (ie. not ALSA-emulated OSS) is used as the sound driver. WoW and StarCraft spring to mind immediately. Plus apparently they work in Cedega without ne

Re: What would most aid WINE development?

2005-11-18 Thread Aneurin Price
Juan Lang wrote: The Windows API is of course public, so my guess is that isn't a huge bar to creating WINE. Unfortunately, you guess incorrectly. While the API may legally be public (the interface can't be protected, as far as we know,) it isn't always documented. MS uses undocumented APIs

Re: wine overstepping the mark?

2005-10-27 Thread Aneurin Price
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:11:21 +0200, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thursday, October 27, 2005, 5:04:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the explaination but that's just my point. That is windows mentality, but this is not windows. If I instal

Re: pf_vsnprintf implementatnion of 'I', 'I32' and 'I64' prefixes for type specifiers

2005-08-08 Thread Aneurin Price
become competent. If anyone wants to look at it though, try the archive for wine-devel and wine-patches. If anyone has a *particular* interest, I might even have a look at it again with the benefit of at least *some* additional coding practice :). At least I could reduce the number of HeapAllocs, though I imagine there are more fundamental problems... Aneurin Price

Re: SetThreadPriority??

2005-06-14 Thread Aneurin Price
Andreas Mohr wrote: Hi guys, has ANYONE done any testing with my experimental SetThreadPriority patch which I mailed on May 15? So far I haven't received any replies, despite this probably being rather interesting, given that it is implemented by many of our winmm threads... Or should this rema

Re: MSVCRT: Re-implement *printf

2005-01-29 Thread Aneurin Price
Jesse Allen wrote: Sorry for being late at responding. I took a look at it finally like a week ago. You can definately break up the patch. Erm, nevermind on breaking it up yet. I started to myself, but I think it's more trouble than it's worth right now. We can have that done later if tha

Re: MSVCRT: Re-implement *printf

2005-01-28 Thread Aneurin Price
Changelog: Re-implement all *printf functions in msvcrt.dll, according to http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt_format_specification_fields_.2d_.printf_and_wprintf_functions.asp and descriptions of appropriate functions. This should fix, among other thi

Re: MSVCRT: Re-implement *printf

2005-01-07 Thread Aneurin Price
Juan Lang wrote: Style point: (*pointer).whatever is written a bit more easily as pointer->whatever. That'd make your new patch a good bit more readable. --Juan __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/

MSVCRT printf functions

2005-01-06 Thread Aneurin Price
I used (these are specified in the copyright notice for printf.c, BTW). It's also pretty big; I presume it's okay to have this much in one file, but maybe not. Either way it can't be broken down into smaller patches since it's one big change. Thanks, Aneurin P

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-28 Thread Aneurin Price
Mike Hearn wrote: On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 20:37:21 +, Aneurin Price wrote: Thanks for that; it's just the kind of comment I was looking for. It wasn't a full patch as I wasn't planning to get it applied, and a number of points were where I copied code from what was there alrea

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-27 Thread Aneurin Price
prove this. Aneurin Price Index: dlls/msvcrt/Makefile.in === RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/msvcrt/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -u -r1.17 Makefile.in --- dlls/msvcrt/Makefile.in 8 Nov 2004 22:10:43 - 1.1

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-18 Thread Aneurin Price
Alexandre Julliard wrote: Aneurin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Any further comments on this? Hard to say, that code is really painful to read. Please try to better follow the coding conventions used in the rest of the code. Apologies for long delay; I've been playing World of W

Re: Resend: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf functions

2004-11-08 Thread Aneurin Price
Any further comments on this?

Re: Some conformance tests for msvcrt printf functions

2004-11-02 Thread Aneurin Price
Is there any particular reason this patch hasn't been committed? Something wrong or just overlooked?

Re: Re-implement MSVCRT *printf

2004-10-28 Thread Aneurin Price
Mike McCormack wrote: Aneurin Price wrote: Comments, anyone? Looks like you've put quite a bit of effort into that. I think it's a worthwhile effort, however, please consider: * using a style more consistent with the rest of the Wine codebase Could you elaborate on this point? I

Re: Warcraft 3 Copy Protection (regression?)

2004-10-11 Thread Aneurin Price
) - although in figuring that out I did find another bug which was since fixed:-). Anyway, as far as I'm aware it's currently fine (though copy protection only works if winver is set to one of the NT line). Aneurin Price

Re: Bugzilla Bug 2075: *printf incompatibilities

2004-09-22 Thread Aneurin Price
Mike Hearn wrote: Aneurin Price wrote: I've been looking at Warcraft III today, and had the problem of single player campaigns not showing up. The reason behind this is explained at http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2075, and sure enough adding the special case described for the I64 arg

Bugzilla Bug 2075: *printf incompatibilities

2004-09-20 Thread Aneurin Price
implementation would work. I was kind of hoping that this might be an okay place to start learning about WINE development, so if this in fact hinges on something far more complicated than I've been able to grasp, somebody please point this out to me :). Any pointers? Thanks, Aneurin Price

Regression with Blizzard patching software

2004-05-20 Thread Aneurin Price
py to provide any further information I can and thought this would be worth pointing out. Aneurin Price