pcRaiseException(hr);
>>> }
>>>
>>> params->msg = (RPCOLEMESSAGE *)msg;
>>>
>> You've changed the code paths here.
>>
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> I'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you implying that I need return
> statements after the RpcRaiseException() calls? Can one not just rely on
> the fact that RpcRaiseException() does not return to the caller?
>
> -- Andy.
>
>
>
>
You completely removed the return from the function at those two points,
allowing it to fall through.
--
Brian Gerst
even the same stack, BTW).
Because even in 16-bit mode (real, vm86 or 16-bit protected) you can use
32-bit instructions, with an operand and/or address size override
prefix. Of course this only works on 386 or later.
--
Brian Gerst
