this application?
--
Cyril Margorin
, and useShm
field correctly in X11DRV_SetDIBits?
Why it was NULL in X11DRV_GetDIBits and is NULL in X11DRV_SetDIBits,
with useShm hardcoded to FALSE?
--
Cyril Margorin
suggestions?
2006/1/27, Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I've discovered, that using of GetDIBits after StretchDIBits doesn't
return correct data.
More then - all pixels that it returns are black.
In attachment the test function.
Changelog:
Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
add test
or two.
Changelog:
Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix of CopyImage function for non-compatible to ScreenDC bitmaps.
Handling of LR_CREATEDIBSECTION flag.
user_cursoricon_copyimage.3.patch
Description: Binary data
Hello,
I've discovered, that using of GetDIBits after StretchDIBits doesn't
return correct data.
More then - all pixels that it returns are black.
In attachment the test function.
Changelog:
Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
add test of StretchDIBits()/GetDIBits() bunch to gdi/test/bitmap.c
Hello,
Is something wrong with patch that I sent before?
I wonder that no one tell me anything about it.
2006/1/12, Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I've just noticed that Alexander had put patch that eliminates
crashing on CopyImage. The way, he solved this problem is simple
/23, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Is something wrong with patch that I sent before?
I wonder that no one tell me anything about it.
You are creating a DIB section in all cases, that's not what the
function is supposed to do. I'd
loses color table information, stored with DIB.
- New created image should be easy selectable in DC, but it must have
DIB section and associated created PhysicalPixmap.
In attachment you can find my (next) view on that function.
--
Cyril Margorin
user_cursoricon_copyimage.2.patch
Description
.
In attachment you may find a patch for it.
Am I wrong somewhere?
2005/11/25, Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
During research the crashing application I've found a problem that can
be easily reproduced by test.
(http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-November/022384.html
I'm sorry, previouse diff was made with '-u' flag.
In attachment - fixed one.
2005/12/10, Cyril Margorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Could anyone tell me, why function CopyImage uses
GetBitmapBits/SetBitmapBits, while MSDN marks these function as
absolete?
I've tried to move from
Unfortunately, problem is that GetBitmapBits function in wine is
incorrect, and may causes a buffer overflow, but the GetDIBits isn't.
2005/12/10, Mike McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cyril Margorin wrote:
Could anyone tell me, why function CopyImage uses
GetBitmapBits/SetBitmapBits, while
was looked up from same
file. It uses static variable screen_dc
But may be you are right, GetDC(0) should be used.
2005/12/10, Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Friday, December 9, 2005, 3:12:23 PM, Cyril Margorin wrote:
Hello,
Could anyone tell me, why function CopyImage uses
is that it takes
in to account only physical pixmap (as it was called in
x11drv/bitmap.c) but it should take pair physical pixmap/logical
bitmap, and make pixels conversion from one to another.
--
Cyril Margorin
++)
===
--
Cyril Margorin
14 matches
Mail list logo
